Changing Indications for Cervical Cerclage Following the Introduction of Routine Ultrasound Surveillance of Cervical Length for Prediction and Prevention of Preterm Birth.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Women's Health Pub Date : 2024-10-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IJWH.S477974
Hasan Rawashdeh, Aparna Ramachandran, Jenny M Yang, Gemma Blain, Jon Hyett
{"title":"Changing Indications for Cervical Cerclage Following the Introduction of Routine Ultrasound Surveillance of Cervical Length for Prediction and Prevention of Preterm Birth.","authors":"Hasan Rawashdeh, Aparna Ramachandran, Jenny M Yang, Gemma Blain, Jon Hyett","doi":"10.2147/IJWH.S477974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preterm birth (PTB) is associated with significant neonatal mortality and morbidity. Universal measurement of cervical length has been proposed as a screening tool to direct intervention to prevent PTB.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the impact of the introduction of sonographic mid-trimester cervical length screening on the use of cervical cerclage and PTB.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study reviewed two groups of women who underwent cervical cerclage before and after the introduction of universal sonographic cervical length screening. Demographics and outcomes were compared using Student's <i>t</i> test, Fisher's Exact test and Kaplan-Meier analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following introduction of universal cervical length screening, the overall rate of cerclage increased from 2.5/1000 births to 6.0/1000 births (p < 0.01). There was a reduction in the proportion of sutures placed purely based on maternal history (50.0% to 30.4%; p < 0.001), while the proportion of sutures placed following ultrasound assessment increased in both high- (21.7 to 36.6%) and low-risk (11.7% to 30.4%) women (p < 0.001). The overall rate of PTB <37 weeks in women has a cerclage was 25.7% and was highest in women undergoing rescue cerclage (64.3%; p < 0.01). There was no difference in the rate of PTB between high- and low-risk women undergoing history- or ultrasound-indicated cerclage. Mean pregnancy length was most prolonged in low-risk women undergoing ultrasound-indicated cerclage, extending gestation from 33.9 to 38.3 weeks (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Universal cervical length screening results in an increase in the use of cerclage, specifically on the basis of the ultrasound findings. Women who were at low risk but then underwent ultrasound-indicated cerclage experienced most prolongation of pregnancy. Women who were at high risk but had a suture on the basis of ultrasound findings-indicated cerclage represent an alternative method of management with no significant difference in the gestational age of delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":14356,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Women's Health","volume":"16 ","pages":"1755-1764"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11523940/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S477974","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preterm birth (PTB) is associated with significant neonatal mortality and morbidity. Universal measurement of cervical length has been proposed as a screening tool to direct intervention to prevent PTB.

Aim: To assess the impact of the introduction of sonographic mid-trimester cervical length screening on the use of cervical cerclage and PTB.

Material and methods: A retrospective cohort study reviewed two groups of women who underwent cervical cerclage before and after the introduction of universal sonographic cervical length screening. Demographics and outcomes were compared using Student's t test, Fisher's Exact test and Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results: Following introduction of universal cervical length screening, the overall rate of cerclage increased from 2.5/1000 births to 6.0/1000 births (p < 0.01). There was a reduction in the proportion of sutures placed purely based on maternal history (50.0% to 30.4%; p < 0.001), while the proportion of sutures placed following ultrasound assessment increased in both high- (21.7 to 36.6%) and low-risk (11.7% to 30.4%) women (p < 0.001). The overall rate of PTB <37 weeks in women has a cerclage was 25.7% and was highest in women undergoing rescue cerclage (64.3%; p < 0.01). There was no difference in the rate of PTB between high- and low-risk women undergoing history- or ultrasound-indicated cerclage. Mean pregnancy length was most prolonged in low-risk women undergoing ultrasound-indicated cerclage, extending gestation from 33.9 to 38.3 weeks (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: Universal cervical length screening results in an increase in the use of cerclage, specifically on the basis of the ultrasound findings. Women who were at low risk but then underwent ultrasound-indicated cerclage experienced most prolongation of pregnancy. Women who were at high risk but had a suture on the basis of ultrasound findings-indicated cerclage represent an alternative method of management with no significant difference in the gestational age of delivery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为预测和预防早产而引入常规宫颈长度超声监测后,宫颈环扎术的适应症发生了变化。
背景:早产(PTB)与严重的新生儿死亡率和发病率有关。目的:评估引入超声中孕期宫颈长度筛查对宫颈环扎术的使用和早产的影响:一项回顾性队列研究回顾了两组妇女,她们分别在宫颈长度超声筛查普及前后接受了宫颈环扎术。采用学生 t 检验、费雪精确检验和 Kaplan-Meier 分析比较了人口统计学和结果:结果:普及宫颈长度筛查后,宫颈环扎术的总比例从 2.5/1000 例增加到 6.0/1000 例(P < 0.01)。纯粹根据产妇病史进行缝合的比例有所下降(从 50.0% 降至 30.4%;p < 0.001),而根据超声波评估进行缝合的比例在高风险(21.7% 升至 36.6%)和低风险(11.7% 升至 30.4%)产妇中均有所上升(p < 0.001)。宫颈息肉的总体发生率 结论:普及宫颈长度筛查可降低宫颈息肉的发生率:普遍宫颈长度筛查导致宫颈环扎术的使用增加,特别是根据超声波检查结果。低风险但随后接受了超声提示的宫颈环扎术的妇女妊娠期延长的情况最多。高风险但根据超声波检查结果显示需要进行宫颈环扎术的妇女,可选择另一种处理方法,但在分娩胎龄方面没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Women's Health
International Journal of Women's Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Women''s Health is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal. Publishing original research, reports, editorials, reviews and commentaries on all aspects of women''s healthcare including gynecology, obstetrics, and breast cancer. Subject areas include: Chronic conditions including cancers of various organs specific and not specific to women Migraine, headaches, arthritis, osteoporosis Endocrine and autoimmune syndromes - asthma, multiple sclerosis, lupus, diabetes Sexual and reproductive health including fertility patterns and emerging technologies to address infertility Infectious disease with chronic sequelae including HIV/AIDS, HPV, PID, and other STDs Psychological and psychosocial conditions - depression across the life span, substance abuse, domestic violence Health maintenance among aging females - factors affecting the quality of life including physical, social and mental issues Avenues for health promotion and disease prevention across the life span Male vs female incidence comparisons for conditions that affect both genders.
期刊最新文献
Corticosteroid Phobia: A Key Barrier to Treatment in Young Women with Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis. The Global Burden of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in Women of Reproductive Age: Findings from the GBD 2019 Study. Traditional and Non-Traditional Risk Factors of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Young Women: Evidence from the ANCORS-YW Study. A Qualitative Exploration of Emotional Experiences in Patients with Thin Endometrium Undergoing Repeated Cancellations of Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles. A Rare Case of Metachronous Clear Cell Ovarian Carcinoma and Thyroid Carcinoma: Clinical and Pathological Insights.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1