Clinical Significance of Lumbar Puncture in Children with First Febrile Seizures.

IF 0.8 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Iranian Journal of Child Neurology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-29 DOI:10.22037/ijcn.v18i4.38524
Yoon Zi Kim, Hae Woon Jung, Eun Hye Lee
{"title":"Clinical Significance of Lumbar Puncture in Children with First Febrile Seizures.","authors":"Yoon Zi Kim, Hae Woon Jung, Eun Hye Lee","doi":"10.22037/ijcn.v18i4.38524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the need for lumbar puncture (LP) in children aged 6 to 60 months experiencing their first febrile seizure, regardless of seizure type, and to determine if LP is particularly beneficial for those under 12 months old.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, data from 253 children who presented with first febrile seizure were analyzed. All patients in this study underwent LP and were divided into two groups based on their cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) results: non-pleocytosis and pleocytosis. Patients were evaluated for age, sex, familial history of seizure, and type and duration of seizures. They were also evaluated based on laboratory results, including blood tests, CSF analysis, and electroencephalography.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-seven (25.9%) of the 253 patients were under 12 months of age, and only two of the 67 patients (2.8%) had pleocytosis. Patients younger than 12 months did not have a higher rate of complex febrile seizure or pleocytosis than those over 13 months of age. None of the patients had bacterial meningitis. Regarding viral meningitis, seven patients (5.3%; age mean SD, 12.3±1.8 months) were diagnosed with enteroviral meningitis, though only one of them had pleocytosis. When compared to the non-pleocytosis group, the pleocytosis group showed no differences in clinical characteristics (age, sex, familial history of seizure, type, and duration of seizure), laboratory results, or the use of antiepileptic drugs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study suggests that LP should be carefully considered in children with first febrile seizure, including children under 12 months of age.</p>","PeriodicalId":14537,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Child Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520267/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Child Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/ijcn.v18i4.38524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the need for lumbar puncture (LP) in children aged 6 to 60 months experiencing their first febrile seizure, regardless of seizure type, and to determine if LP is particularly beneficial for those under 12 months old.

Materials & methods: In this retrospective study, data from 253 children who presented with first febrile seizure were analyzed. All patients in this study underwent LP and were divided into two groups based on their cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) results: non-pleocytosis and pleocytosis. Patients were evaluated for age, sex, familial history of seizure, and type and duration of seizures. They were also evaluated based on laboratory results, including blood tests, CSF analysis, and electroencephalography.

Results: Sixty-seven (25.9%) of the 253 patients were under 12 months of age, and only two of the 67 patients (2.8%) had pleocytosis. Patients younger than 12 months did not have a higher rate of complex febrile seizure or pleocytosis than those over 13 months of age. None of the patients had bacterial meningitis. Regarding viral meningitis, seven patients (5.3%; age mean SD, 12.3±1.8 months) were diagnosed with enteroviral meningitis, though only one of them had pleocytosis. When compared to the non-pleocytosis group, the pleocytosis group showed no differences in clinical characteristics (age, sex, familial history of seizure, type, and duration of seizure), laboratory results, or the use of antiepileptic drugs.

Conclusion: The present study suggests that LP should be carefully considered in children with first febrile seizure, including children under 12 months of age.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
首次发热性癫痫发作患儿腰椎穿刺的临床意义
目的评估首次发热性癫痫发作的 6 至 60 个月儿童(无论其发作类型如何)是否需要进行腰椎穿刺(LP),并确定腰椎穿刺是否对 12 个月以下的儿童特别有益:在这项回顾性研究中,对 253 名首次发热性癫痫发作儿童的数据进行了分析。研究中的所有患者都接受了 LP 治疗,并根据脑脊液(CSF)结果分为两组:非多血质组和多血质组。对患者的年龄、性别、家族癫痫史、癫痫发作类型和持续时间进行了评估。此外,还根据血液化验、脑脊液分析和脑电图等实验室结果对患者进行了评估:253名患者中有67名(25.9%)年龄不足12个月,67名患者中只有2名(2.8%)有多血细胞增多。与 13 个月以上的患者相比,12 个月以下的患者发生复杂发热性惊厥或出现胸水的比例并不高。没有一名患者患有细菌性脑膜炎。在病毒性脑膜炎方面,7 名患者(5.3%;平均年龄(SD)为 12.3±1.8 个月)被诊断为肠道病毒性脑膜炎,但其中只有一人出现了胸水。与无胸水细胞增多组相比,胸水细胞增多组在临床特征(年龄、性别、家族性癫痫发作史、类型和发作持续时间)、实验室结果或抗癫痫药物的使用方面均无差异:本研究表明,对于首次发热性癫痫发作的儿童,包括 12 个月以下的儿童,应慎重考虑 LP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Cerebral Necrotizing Encephalopathy in a 7-year-old Child after being Infected with COVID-19, A Case Report. Dehydrogenase (DLD) Deficiency in an Iranian Patient with Recurrent Intractable Vomiting: Successful Treatment with Thiamine Supplementation. Evaluation of Neurological and Auditory Development in Children with Congenital Heart Disease using Essence Q Questionnaire and Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) Test. Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy Indicators of Sarnat and Sarnat Scoring in Neonatal Subjects with Perinatal Asphyxia. Identification of a Novel Variant in CC2D1A Gene Linked to Autosomal Recessive Intellectual Disability 3 in an Iranian Family and Investigating the Structure and Pleiotropic Effects of this Gene.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1