Quality of life improvement after radiotherapy for bone metastases assessed using real-world data: a secondary analysis of a Nationwide Multicenter Cohort Study.
{"title":"Quality of life improvement after radiotherapy for bone metastases assessed using real-world data: a secondary analysis of a Nationwide Multicenter Cohort Study.","authors":"Nobuko Utsumi, Tetsuo Saito, Naoto Shikama, Takeo Takahashi, Hideyuki Harada, Naoki Nakamura, Shuichi Ueno, Akifumi Notsu, Hiroki Shirato, Kazunari Yamada, Haruka Uezono, Yutaro Koide, Hikaru Kubota, Takuya Yamazaki, Kei Ito, Joichi Heianna, Yukinori Okada, Ayako Tonari, Norio Katoh, Hitoshi Wada, Yasuo Ejima, Kayo Yoshida, Takashi Kosugi, Shigeo Takahashi, Takafumi Komiyama, Nobue Uchida, Misako Miwa, Miho Watanabe, Hisayasu Nagakura, Hiroko Ikeda, Isao Asakawa, Naoyuki Shigematsu","doi":"10.1093/jjco/hyae150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Single-center studies or randomized controlled trials have evaluated the impact of radiotherapy for bone metastases on quality of life (QOL). We investigated the real-world impact of radiotherapy for bone metastases on QOL using nationwide multicenter cohort data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective observational study at 26 centers in Japan. Of 333 patients who received radiotherapy for bone metastases between December 2020 and March 2021, 232 (70%) were enrolled in the study. Patient-reported QOL was evaluated at enrollment and at two- and six-month follow-up using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QOL Questionnaire Core 15-Palliative and the EORTC QOL Questionnaire Bone Metastases module (QLQ-BM22). Possible predictors (patient-, tumor -, and treatment-related factors) of QOL improvement were screened using logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>QOL scores showed significant improvement at two-month follow-up in seven (global health status/QOL, emotional functioning, pain, insomnia, painful sites, pain characteristics and functional interference) of the 14 scales. Of these seven scales, mean improvement ≥ the minimal clinically important difference (defined by a change of 10 or more on the 0 to 100 scale) was seen in four scales (pain, insomnia, pain characteristics and functional interference). We did not find any predictors of QOL improvement in the functional interference scale of QLQ-BM22.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiotherapy for bone metastases performed in daily practice is effective in improving some scales of QOL.</p>","PeriodicalId":14656,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyae150","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Single-center studies or randomized controlled trials have evaluated the impact of radiotherapy for bone metastases on quality of life (QOL). We investigated the real-world impact of radiotherapy for bone metastases on QOL using nationwide multicenter cohort data.
Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study at 26 centers in Japan. Of 333 patients who received radiotherapy for bone metastases between December 2020 and March 2021, 232 (70%) were enrolled in the study. Patient-reported QOL was evaluated at enrollment and at two- and six-month follow-up using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QOL Questionnaire Core 15-Palliative and the EORTC QOL Questionnaire Bone Metastases module (QLQ-BM22). Possible predictors (patient-, tumor -, and treatment-related factors) of QOL improvement were screened using logistic regression models.
Results: QOL scores showed significant improvement at two-month follow-up in seven (global health status/QOL, emotional functioning, pain, insomnia, painful sites, pain characteristics and functional interference) of the 14 scales. Of these seven scales, mean improvement ≥ the minimal clinically important difference (defined by a change of 10 or more on the 0 to 100 scale) was seen in four scales (pain, insomnia, pain characteristics and functional interference). We did not find any predictors of QOL improvement in the functional interference scale of QLQ-BM22.
Conclusion: Radiotherapy for bone metastases performed in daily practice is effective in improving some scales of QOL.
期刊介绍:
Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for clinical oncologists which strives to publish high quality manuscripts addressing medical oncology, clinical trials, radiology, surgery, basic research, and palliative care. The journal aims to contribute to the world"s scientific community with special attention to the area of clinical oncology and the Asian region.
JJCO publishes various articles types including:
・Original Articles
・Case Reports
・Clinical Trial Notes
・Cancer Genetics Reports
・Epidemiology Notes
・Technical Notes
・Short Communications
・Letters to the Editors
・Solicited Reviews