A schema for coding health equity scholarship within pediatric research.

IF 2.1 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2024-10-02 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cts.2024.594
Najma Abdi, Sabrina W Tso, Cheyenne Roduin, Elisabeth Nylander, Amanda L Jones, Susan L Groshong, Julia Paulsen, Brian E Saelens
{"title":"A schema for coding health equity scholarship within pediatric research.","authors":"Najma Abdi, Sabrina W Tso, Cheyenne Roduin, Elisabeth Nylander, Amanda L Jones, Susan L Groshong, Julia Paulsen, Brian E Saelens","doi":"10.1017/cts.2024.594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Seattle Children's Research Institute is identifying the amount and type of health equity scholarship being conducted institution wide. However, methods for categorizing how scholarship is equity-focused are lacking. We developed and evaluated the reliability of a health equity scholarship coding schema applied to Seattle Children's affiliated scholarship.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 2021-2022 Ovid MEDLINE affiliation search yielded 3551 affiliated scholarship records, with 1079 records identified via an existing filter as scholarship addressing social determinants of health. Through reliability testing and examining concordance and discordance across three independent coders of these records, we developed a coding schema to classify health equity scholarship (yes/no). When health equity scholarship proved positive/Yes, the coders assigned a one through five maturity rating of the scholarship towards addressing inequities. Subsequent reliability testing including a new coder was conducted for 992 subsequent affiliated scholarship records (Oct 2022-June 2023), with additional testing of the sensitivity and specificity of the existing filter relative to the new coding schema.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reliability for identifying health equity scholarship was consistently high (Fleiss kappas ≥ .78) and categorization of health equity scholarship into maturity levels was moderate (Fleiss kappas ≥ .47). The coding schema identified additional health equity scholarship not captured in an existing filter for social determinants of health scholarship. Based on the new schema, 23.3% of Seattle Childrens' affiliated scholarship published October 2002-June 2023 was health equity focused.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This new coding schema can be used to identify and categorize health equity scholarship to help quantitate the health equity focus of portfolios of human-focused research.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"8 1","pages":"e141"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11523018/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Seattle Children's Research Institute is identifying the amount and type of health equity scholarship being conducted institution wide. However, methods for categorizing how scholarship is equity-focused are lacking. We developed and evaluated the reliability of a health equity scholarship coding schema applied to Seattle Children's affiliated scholarship.

Methods: A 2021-2022 Ovid MEDLINE affiliation search yielded 3551 affiliated scholarship records, with 1079 records identified via an existing filter as scholarship addressing social determinants of health. Through reliability testing and examining concordance and discordance across three independent coders of these records, we developed a coding schema to classify health equity scholarship (yes/no). When health equity scholarship proved positive/Yes, the coders assigned a one through five maturity rating of the scholarship towards addressing inequities. Subsequent reliability testing including a new coder was conducted for 992 subsequent affiliated scholarship records (Oct 2022-June 2023), with additional testing of the sensitivity and specificity of the existing filter relative to the new coding schema.

Results: Reliability for identifying health equity scholarship was consistently high (Fleiss kappas ≥ .78) and categorization of health equity scholarship into maturity levels was moderate (Fleiss kappas ≥ .47). The coding schema identified additional health equity scholarship not captured in an existing filter for social determinants of health scholarship. Based on the new schema, 23.3% of Seattle Childrens' affiliated scholarship published October 2002-June 2023 was health equity focused.

Conclusions: This new coding schema can be used to identify and categorize health equity scholarship to help quantitate the health equity focus of portfolios of human-focused research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科研究中健康公平奖学金的编码模式。
简介:西雅图儿童研究所(Seattle Children's Research Institute)正在确定全校范围内开展的健康公平奖学金的数量和类型。然而,目前还缺乏对以公平为重点的奖学金进行分类的方法。我们开发并评估了适用于西雅图儿童研究所附属奖学金的健康公平奖学金编码模式的可靠性:方法:在 2021-2022 年的 Ovid MEDLINE 关联检索中,我们获得了 3551 条关联奖学金记录,其中有 1079 条记录通过现有的过滤器被识别为涉及健康的社会决定因素的奖学金。通过可靠性测试以及对这些记录的三位独立编码者的一致性和不一致性进行检查,我们制定了一个编码模式来对健康公平奖学金进行分类(是/否)。当健康公平奖学金被证明为 "是/否 "时,编码员会对解决不公平问题的奖学金进行一至五级的成熟度评级。随后,包括一名新的编码员在内,对992份后续附属奖学金记录(2022年10月至2023年6月)进行了可靠性测试,并根据新的编码模式对现有过滤器的灵敏度和特异性进行了额外测试:识别健康公平奖学金的可信度一直很高(Fleiss kappas ≥ .78),健康公平奖学金的成熟度分类适中(Fleiss kappas ≥ .47)。编码模式确定了现有的健康社会决定因素奖学金筛选中未包含的其他健康公平奖学金。根据新的模式,2002 年 10 月至 2023 年 6 月发表的西雅图儿童医院附属奖学金中有 23.3% 以健康公平为重点:结论:这一新的编码模式可用于识别和分类健康公平奖学金,以帮助量化以人为本的研究组合对健康公平的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Overview of ACTIV trial-specific lessons learned. Preparing better: Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines (ACTIV) therapeutics trials lessons learned: A call to the future. The future is now: Using the lessons learned from the ACTIV COVID-19 therapeutics trials to create an inclusive and efficient clinical trials enterprise. ACTIV trials: Lessons learned in trial design in the setting of an emergent pandemic. Lessons learned from COVID-19 to overcome challenges in conducting outpatient clinical trials to find safe and effective therapeutics for the next infectious pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1