The use of tourniquet in total knee arthroplasty does not impact the functional outcome: a randomised controlled study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1186/s13018-024-05203-y
Magnus Johnsen, Steinar Havik, Vigdis Schnell Husby, Siri Bjørgen Winther, Olav A Foss, Otto Schnell Husby, Øystein Bjerkestrand Lian
{"title":"The use of tourniquet in total knee arthroplasty does not impact the functional outcome: a randomised controlled study.","authors":"Magnus Johnsen, Steinar Havik, Vigdis Schnell Husby, Siri Bjørgen Winther, Olav A Foss, Otto Schnell Husby, Øystein Bjerkestrand Lian","doi":"10.1186/s13018-024-05203-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluates the clinical evidence for performing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without a tourniquet, a shift from the near-universal use in 2009 to current trends towards tourniquet-less TKA in Norway and Sweden. This change is set against a backdrop of conflicting evidence regarding the positive and negative effects of tourniquet use.</p><p><strong>Questions/purposes: </strong>The aims were to determine if the tourniquet has an impact on [1] Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) at 8 weeks after surgery; [2] postoperative strength and function; [3] postoperative pain and opioid analgesic use; and [4] operative time, bleeding, and length of stay (LOS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty-one patients were randomised to TKA with or without a tourniquet. The outcome measures, FJS-12, muscle strength, functional test, pain, estimated blood loss, haemoglobin (Hb) loss, knee circumference, opioid consumption, and LOS were assessed preoperatively and at 1 day, 8 weeks, and 1 year after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference in FJS-12 scores was found between the two groups at postoperative 8 weeks. However, the tourniquet group showed statistically significant better knee extension strength at 8 weeks (p = 0.045). There were no differences in other outcomes, except for a greater decrease in haemoglobin levels (p = 0.02) and higher estimated perioperative blood loss (p < 0.001) in the no tourniquet group than the torniquet group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study indicates that tourniquet use during TKA causes no significant differences in FJS-12 at 8 weeks, significantly reduces bleeding and postoperative Hb loss, and improves quadriceps strength at 8 weeks.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrails.gov. Registry Number: NCT03666598. Registered 30 August 2018.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"19 1","pages":"704"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11523877/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05203-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study evaluates the clinical evidence for performing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without a tourniquet, a shift from the near-universal use in 2009 to current trends towards tourniquet-less TKA in Norway and Sweden. This change is set against a backdrop of conflicting evidence regarding the positive and negative effects of tourniquet use.

Questions/purposes: The aims were to determine if the tourniquet has an impact on [1] Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) at 8 weeks after surgery; [2] postoperative strength and function; [3] postoperative pain and opioid analgesic use; and [4] operative time, bleeding, and length of stay (LOS).

Methods: Eighty-one patients were randomised to TKA with or without a tourniquet. The outcome measures, FJS-12, muscle strength, functional test, pain, estimated blood loss, haemoglobin (Hb) loss, knee circumference, opioid consumption, and LOS were assessed preoperatively and at 1 day, 8 weeks, and 1 year after surgery.

Results: No significant difference in FJS-12 scores was found between the two groups at postoperative 8 weeks. However, the tourniquet group showed statistically significant better knee extension strength at 8 weeks (p = 0.045). There were no differences in other outcomes, except for a greater decrease in haemoglobin levels (p = 0.02) and higher estimated perioperative blood loss (p < 0.001) in the no tourniquet group than the torniquet group.

Conclusions: Our study indicates that tourniquet use during TKA causes no significant differences in FJS-12 at 8 weeks, significantly reduces bleeding and postoperative Hb loss, and improves quadriceps strength at 8 weeks.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrails.gov. Registry Number: NCT03666598. Registered 30 August 2018.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在全膝关节置换术中使用止血带不会影响功能结果:一项随机对照研究。
背景:这项研究评估了在不使用止血带的情况下进行全膝关节置换术(TKA)的临床证据,挪威和瑞典从2009年几乎普遍使用止血带转变为目前的无止血带TKA趋势。这一变化的背景是,有关使用止血带的积极和消极影响的证据相互矛盾:问题/目的:目的是确定止血带是否对以下方面产生影响:[1] 术后8周的FJS-12评分;[2] 术后力量和功能;[3] 术后疼痛和阿片类镇痛药的使用;[4] 手术时间、出血量和住院时间(LOS):81名患者被随机分配到使用或不使用止血带的TKA手术中。术前、术后 1 天、8 周和 1 年分别对 FJS-12、肌力、功能测试、疼痛、估计失血量、血红蛋白(Hb)损失、膝围、阿片类药物消耗量和住院时间进行评估:术后 8 周时,两组患者的 FJS-12 评分无明显差异。然而,止血带组在 8 周时的膝关节伸展力量明显优于止血带组(P = 0.045)。除了血红蛋白水平下降幅度较大(p = 0.02)和围术期估计失血量较高(p 结论:我们的研究表明,使用止血带能有效减少围术期失血量:我们的研究表明,在 TKA 期间使用止血带不会导致 8 周时 FJS-12 的显著差异,但会显著减少出血和术后血红蛋白丢失,并在 8 周时改善股四头肌力量:试验注册:Clinicaltrails.gov.试验注册:Clinicaltrails.gov:NCT03666598。注册时间:2018 年 8 月 30 日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of surgical invasiveness and hidden blood loss between unilateral double portal endoscopic lumbar disc extraction and percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. Effect of the orthogeriatric co-management on older hip fracture patients with multimorbidity: a post-hoc exploratory subgroup analysis of a non-randomised controlled trial. Pilot study on the in-vitro effect of radiation therapy on bending stiffness of intramedullary photodynamic implants. Comparison of three sacral screw internal fixation techniques in the treatment of L4-S1 lumbar degenerative disease with osteoporosis: a retrospective observational study. Correction: CRISPR activation identifies a novel miR-2861 binding site that facilitates the osteogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1