Cast-OFF 2: one week versus three to five weeks of plaster cast immobilization for non-or minimally displaced distal radius fractures, a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1097/BOT.0000000000002930
Marcel A N de Bruijn, Emily Z Boersma, Lysanne van Silfhout, Laura A van Ginkel, Tjarda N Tromp, Erik van de Krol, Michael J R Edwards, Vincent M A Stirler, Erik Hermans
{"title":"Cast-OFF 2: one week versus three to five weeks of plaster cast immobilization for non-or minimally displaced distal radius fractures, a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Marcel A N de Bruijn, Emily Z Boersma, Lysanne van Silfhout, Laura A van Ginkel, Tjarda N Tromp, Erik van de Krol, Michael J R Edwards, Vincent M A Stirler, Erik Hermans","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Implementation of one week of cast immobilization followed by gradually increasing wrist mobilization for non- or minimally displaced DRF and comparison of the functional outcomes and pain scores with the usual care (three to five weeks of cast immobilization).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: A randomized stepped wedge cluster design, prospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic and peripheral hospitals in level 1, 2, and 3 trauma centers.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>All patients between 18 and 85 years old with an isolated non- or minimally and nonreduced DRF were eligible for inclusion. Participating hospitals were randomized to transition from usual care (three to five weeks of cast immobilization) to one week of cast immobilization, following the stepped wedge design.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>Patient characteristics, secondary dislocation, surgical treatment, visual analog scale (VAS), Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI), Pain Catastrophizing Scale 4 (PCS-4), and patient satisfaction were compared between control, and intervention group at week 1, 3-5, 6, month 3, 6, and 12. A difference around 11 points on the PRWE scale was considered clinically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>402 patients were included (control n=197 vs intervention n=205, 267/135, female/male). There were no differences in age (53.7 ± 18.6 vs 53.3 ± 19.5, P = 0.27), sex (66% vs 67% female, P 0.44), dominant hand fractured (44% vs 53%, P 0.39), and type of fracture (39% vs 41% extra-articular, P = 0.44) After six weeks, the PRWE score showed no clinically significant differences (-4.5 [CI -12.9, 4.02], P = 0.30). No significant differences were observed for function, pain scores, and patient satisfaction between groups (all P > 0.05). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in secondary dislocation rate (control 1.5% vs intervention 1.0%, p=0.32, P = 0.32) and operation rate (control 1.5% versus 1.5% intervention P = 0.92).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study compared one week of cast immobilization followed by gradually increasing wrist mobilizationto the usual care of three to five weeks for nonreduced DRF. No clinically significant differences in function, pain scores, patient satisfaction, secondary dislocation, and operations were observed. Therefore, one week of plaster immobilization can be safely recommended for the non- or minimally displaced and nonreduced DRF treatment.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002930","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Implementation of one week of cast immobilization followed by gradually increasing wrist mobilization for non- or minimally displaced DRF and comparison of the functional outcomes and pain scores with the usual care (three to five weeks of cast immobilization).

Methods: Design: A randomized stepped wedge cluster design, prospective cohort.

Setting: Academic and peripheral hospitals in level 1, 2, and 3 trauma centers.

Patient selection criteria: All patients between 18 and 85 years old with an isolated non- or minimally and nonreduced DRF were eligible for inclusion. Participating hospitals were randomized to transition from usual care (three to five weeks of cast immobilization) to one week of cast immobilization, following the stepped wedge design.

Outcome measures and comparisons: Patient characteristics, secondary dislocation, surgical treatment, visual analog scale (VAS), Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI), Pain Catastrophizing Scale 4 (PCS-4), and patient satisfaction were compared between control, and intervention group at week 1, 3-5, 6, month 3, 6, and 12. A difference around 11 points on the PRWE scale was considered clinically significant.

Results: 402 patients were included (control n=197 vs intervention n=205, 267/135, female/male). There were no differences in age (53.7 ± 18.6 vs 53.3 ± 19.5, P = 0.27), sex (66% vs 67% female, P 0.44), dominant hand fractured (44% vs 53%, P 0.39), and type of fracture (39% vs 41% extra-articular, P = 0.44) After six weeks, the PRWE score showed no clinically significant differences (-4.5 [CI -12.9, 4.02], P = 0.30). No significant differences were observed for function, pain scores, and patient satisfaction between groups (all P > 0.05). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in secondary dislocation rate (control 1.5% vs intervention 1.0%, p=0.32, P = 0.32) and operation rate (control 1.5% versus 1.5% intervention P = 0.92).

Conclusions: This study compared one week of cast immobilization followed by gradually increasing wrist mobilizationto the usual care of three to five weeks for nonreduced DRF. No clinically significant differences in function, pain scores, patient satisfaction, secondary dislocation, and operations were observed. Therefore, one week of plaster immobilization can be safely recommended for the non- or minimally displaced and nonreduced DRF treatment.

Level of evidence: Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cast-OFF 2:桡骨远端无移位或轻微移位骨折一周与三至五周石膏固定对比,阶梯楔形群随机对照试验。
目标:对无移位或移位轻微的 DRF 患者实施一周石膏固定,然后逐渐增加腕部活动,并将功能结果和疼痛评分与常规护理(三至五周石膏固定)进行比较:方法:设计:随机阶梯式楔形群组设计,前瞻性队列:患者选择标准:所有年龄在 18 至 85 岁之间、患有孤立的非 DRF 或微创和非减创 DRF 的患者均符合纳入条件。参与医院按照阶梯式楔形设计,随机从常规护理(三至五周的石膏固定)过渡到一周的石膏固定:对照组和干预组在第 1 周、第 3-5 周、第 6 周、第 3 个月、第 6 个月和第 12 个月的患者特征、继发性脱位、手术治疗、视觉模拟量表(VAS)、患者腕部评价(PRWE)、患者报告结果测量信息系统疼痛干扰(PROMIS-PI)、疼痛加重量表 4(PCS-4)和患者满意度进行了比较。PRWE量表上11分左右的差异被认为具有临床意义:共纳入 402 名患者(对照组 n=197 vs 干预组 n=205,267/135,女性/男性)。年龄(53.7 ± 18.6 vs 53.3 ± 19.5,P = 0.27)、性别(66% vs 67%为女性,P 0.44)、骨折主导手(44% vs 53%,P 0.39)和骨折类型(39% vs 41%为关节外骨折,P = 0.44)均无差异。各组之间在功能、疼痛评分和患者满意度方面无明显差异(P 均大于 0.05)。此外,二次脱位率(对照组 1.5% vs 干预组 1.0%,P=0.32,P=0.32)和手术率(对照组 1.5% vs 干预组 1.5% P=0.92)也无明显差异:本研究将一周石膏固定后逐渐增加腕关节活动度的治疗方法与三至五周的常规治疗方法进行了比较,后者的DRF未见减轻。在功能、疼痛评分、患者满意度、继发性脱位和手术方面没有观察到明显的临床差异。因此,对于无移位或移位程度轻微的非还原性DRF治疗,建议一周的石膏固定是安全的:证据等级:二级。有关证据等级的完整描述,请参阅 "作者须知"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
The Effects of a Stepped-Care Mental Health Program on Trauma Recidivism at a Level 1 Trauma Center. Tibial Malalignment is an Independent Predictor of Nonunion After Intramedullary Nailing of Tibial Shaft Fractures. Are Drains Associated With Infection After Operative Fixation of High-Risk Tibial Plateau and Pilon Fractures? The Use Of External Beam Radiation Therapy For Heterotopic Ossification Prophylaxis After Surgical Fixation Of Acetabular Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial. A Retrospective Study of Ballistic Pelvic Fractures With Focus on Short-Term Clinical Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1