Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Vestibular Migraine Patient Assessment Tool and Handicap Inventory (VM-PATHI).

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1002/ohn.1035
Adam Gardi, Maxwell Hum, Daniel Wong, Isabel Allen, Jeffrey D Sharon
{"title":"Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Vestibular Migraine Patient Assessment Tool and Handicap Inventory (VM-PATHI).","authors":"Adam Gardi, Maxwell Hum, Daniel Wong, Isabel Allen, Jeffrey D Sharon","doi":"10.1002/ohn.1035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To calculate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the Vestibular Migraine Patient Assessment Tool and Handicap Inventory (VM-PATHI).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A single tertiary care balance and falls center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-three subjects meeting Barany Society criteria for vestibular migraine (VM) or probable VM were included and divided into 3 treatment groups. Treatment was not standardized, instead, management was decided individually between each patient and their provider. All subjects completed VM-PATHI before and after intervention. A Global Rating of Change (GRoC) questionnaire was also completed following intervention. Anchor-based methods, using a GRoC questionnaire, were utilized to estimate the MCID that produced the highest sensitivity and specificity on a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-three subjects were classified as responders and 10 were classified as nonresponders. The mean VM-PATHI pretreatment score minus the posttreatment score between the responders (mean = 14, SD 13) and nonresponders (mean = 4 SD = 12) was statistically significant (mean difference = 10, 95% confidence interval, CI [1, 20], P = .03). The VM-PATHI score change cutoff that best differentiated between responders and nonresponders was a VM-PATHI change of 6. Thus, the MCID was defined as a change of 6 points (sensitivity = 72%, specificity = 70%). The area under the ROC curve was 0.89, 95% CI [0.80, 0.98], which demonstrates an excellent ability for the VM-PATHI score change to discriminate between responders and nonresponders. The average change in VM-PATHI scores was 9 points (SD 11) for those with \"a little better\" rating on the GRoC, 14 points (SD 14) for those with a \"moderately better\" rating, and 20 points (SD 13) for those with a \"very much better\" rating.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with VM are likely to demonstrate clinical improvement if their VM-PATHI score decreases by 6 or more.</p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"623-628"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To calculate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the Vestibular Migraine Patient Assessment Tool and Handicap Inventory (VM-PATHI).

Study design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: A single tertiary care balance and falls center.

Methods: Fifty-three subjects meeting Barany Society criteria for vestibular migraine (VM) or probable VM were included and divided into 3 treatment groups. Treatment was not standardized, instead, management was decided individually between each patient and their provider. All subjects completed VM-PATHI before and after intervention. A Global Rating of Change (GRoC) questionnaire was also completed following intervention. Anchor-based methods, using a GRoC questionnaire, were utilized to estimate the MCID that produced the highest sensitivity and specificity on a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Results: Forty-three subjects were classified as responders and 10 were classified as nonresponders. The mean VM-PATHI pretreatment score minus the posttreatment score between the responders (mean = 14, SD 13) and nonresponders (mean = 4 SD = 12) was statistically significant (mean difference = 10, 95% confidence interval, CI [1, 20], P = .03). The VM-PATHI score change cutoff that best differentiated between responders and nonresponders was a VM-PATHI change of 6. Thus, the MCID was defined as a change of 6 points (sensitivity = 72%, specificity = 70%). The area under the ROC curve was 0.89, 95% CI [0.80, 0.98], which demonstrates an excellent ability for the VM-PATHI score change to discriminate between responders and nonresponders. The average change in VM-PATHI scores was 9 points (SD 11) for those with "a little better" rating on the GRoC, 14 points (SD 14) for those with a "moderately better" rating, and 20 points (SD 13) for those with a "very much better" rating.

Conclusion: Patients with VM are likely to demonstrate clinical improvement if their VM-PATHI score decreases by 6 or more.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前庭性偏头痛患者评估工具和障碍量表(VM-PATHI)的最小临床意义差异。
目的: 计算前庭性偏头痛患者评估工具和障碍量表(VM-PATHI)的最小临床重要差异(MCID):计算前庭性偏头痛患者评估工具和障碍量表(VM-PATHI)的最小临床重要差异(MCID):前瞻性队列研究:研究设计:前瞻性队列研究:方法:纳入符合巴拉尼学会前庭性偏头痛(VM)或可能患有VM标准的53名受试者,并将其分为3个治疗组。治疗方法没有标准化,而是由每位患者和他们的医疗服务提供者单独决定。所有受试者在干预前后都填写了 VM-PATHI。干预后还填写了全球变化评分(GRoC)问卷。通过使用 GRoC 问卷,采用基于锚点的方法估算出在接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)上产生最高灵敏度和特异性的 MCID:结果:43 名受试者被归类为有反应者,10 名受试者被归类为无反应者。应答者(平均值 = 14,标准差 = 13)和非应答者(平均值 = 4,标准差 = 12)之间的 VM-PATHI 治疗前平均得分减去治疗后得分有显著统计学意义(平均差异 = 10,95% 置信区间,CI [1,20],P = .03)。最能区分应答者和无应答者的 VM-PATHI 分数变化临界值是 VM-PATHI 变化为 6 分,因此 MCID 被定义为变化为 6 分(灵敏度 = 72%,特异性 = 70%)。ROC 曲线下的面积为 0.89,95% CI [0.80,0.98],这表明 VM-PATHI 评分变化具有很好的区分应答者和非应答者的能力。GRoC评分为 "稍好 "的患者的VM-PATHI评分平均变化为9分(标准差为11分),评分为 "中等好 "的患者的VM-PATHI评分平均变化为14分(标准差为14分),评分为 "非常好 "的患者的VM-PATHI评分平均变化为20分(标准差为13分):结论:如果 VM-PATHI 分数降低 6 分或更多,则 VM 患者的临床症状可能会得到改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
250
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.
期刊最新文献
Nasal Corticosteroid Delivery Methods in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Polyps: A Systematic Review. Congenital Pyriform Aperture Stenosis: Not All Patients Require Open Repair. Time-Driven Activity Based Costing of an Annual Canadian Cochlear Implant Program. Are Otolaryngologists Seeing More Cough? Longitudinal Trends and Patterns. Effectiveness of Changing Drug Classes in Patients With Refractory Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1