Cardiovascular magnetic resonance semi-automated threshold-based post-processing of right ventricular volumes in repaired tetralogy of Fallot.

IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiologia Medica Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1007/s11547-024-01908-6
Lara Tondi, Stefano Figliozzi, Sara Boveri, Francesco Sturla, Giulia Pasqualin, Antonia Camporeale, Giandomenico Disabato, Andrea Attanasio, Gianpaolo Carrafiello, Pietro Spagnolo, Massimo Lombardi
{"title":"Cardiovascular magnetic resonance semi-automated threshold-based post-processing of right ventricular volumes in repaired tetralogy of Fallot.","authors":"Lara Tondi, Stefano Figliozzi, Sara Boveri, Francesco Sturla, Giulia Pasqualin, Antonia Camporeale, Giandomenico Disabato, Andrea Attanasio, Gianpaolo Carrafiello, Pietro Spagnolo, Massimo Lombardi","doi":"10.1007/s11547-024-01908-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is the gold-standard to estimate right ventricular (RV) volumes, which are key for clinical management of patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF). Semi-automated threshold-based methods (SAT) have been proposed for CMR post-processing as alternatives to fully manual standard tracing. We investigated the impact of SAT on RV analysis using different thresholds in rTOF patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RV volumes and mass were estimated using SAT and standard fully manual tracing methods in rTOF patients. Two threshold levels were set for SAT, i.e., default 50 (SAT-50) and 30 (SAT-30). RV stroke volumes (SV) were compared to main pulmonary artery forward flow (MPA-FF). Post-processing time, intra- and interobserver variabilities were compared across methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-two CMRs of rTOF patients were analyzed. Compared to the standard fully manual tracing, no significant differences in RV mass, volumes and ejection fraction were observed using SAT-30, whereas SAT-50 significantly underestimated RV end-diastolic-volume index (EDVi) by 10.4% (mean difference of - 11.8 ± 6.2 ml/m<sup>2</sup>, p 0.03) and overestimated RV mass index by 21.8% (mean difference of 14.2 ± 11.9 g/m<sup>2</sup>, p 0.002). Compared to MPA-FF, RVSV by standard fully manual method and SAT-30 showed minor biases, respectively, 0.03 ml/m<sup>2</sup> and 0.7 ml/m<sup>2</sup>, while SAT-50 underestimated RVSV by 6.86 ml/m<sup>2</sup> (p < 0.001). In six patients, the degree of RV EDVi underestimation by SAT-50 determined a change of category from dilated to non-dilated RV. Intra- and interobserver variabilities were good to excellent for all methods. Post-processing duration was shorter for SAT compared to standard manual segmentation (5.5 ± 1.7 min vs. 19.5 ± 4.4 min, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CMR SAT-30 post-processing is a precise, accurate and time-saving method for biventricular assessment of volumes, ejection fraction and mass in rTOF.</p>","PeriodicalId":20817,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia Medica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia Medica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-024-01908-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is the gold-standard to estimate right ventricular (RV) volumes, which are key for clinical management of patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF). Semi-automated threshold-based methods (SAT) have been proposed for CMR post-processing as alternatives to fully manual standard tracing. We investigated the impact of SAT on RV analysis using different thresholds in rTOF patients.

Methods: RV volumes and mass were estimated using SAT and standard fully manual tracing methods in rTOF patients. Two threshold levels were set for SAT, i.e., default 50 (SAT-50) and 30 (SAT-30). RV stroke volumes (SV) were compared to main pulmonary artery forward flow (MPA-FF). Post-processing time, intra- and interobserver variabilities were compared across methods.

Results: Sixty-two CMRs of rTOF patients were analyzed. Compared to the standard fully manual tracing, no significant differences in RV mass, volumes and ejection fraction were observed using SAT-30, whereas SAT-50 significantly underestimated RV end-diastolic-volume index (EDVi) by 10.4% (mean difference of - 11.8 ± 6.2 ml/m2, p 0.03) and overestimated RV mass index by 21.8% (mean difference of 14.2 ± 11.9 g/m2, p 0.002). Compared to MPA-FF, RVSV by standard fully manual method and SAT-30 showed minor biases, respectively, 0.03 ml/m2 and 0.7 ml/m2, while SAT-50 underestimated RVSV by 6.86 ml/m2 (p < 0.001). In six patients, the degree of RV EDVi underestimation by SAT-50 determined a change of category from dilated to non-dilated RV. Intra- and interobserver variabilities were good to excellent for all methods. Post-processing duration was shorter for SAT compared to standard manual segmentation (5.5 ± 1.7 min vs. 19.5 ± 4.4 min, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: CMR SAT-30 post-processing is a precise, accurate and time-saving method for biventricular assessment of volumes, ejection fraction and mass in rTOF.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心血管磁共振半自动阈值法洛四联症修复后右心室容积后处理。
背景:心血管磁共振(CMR)是估算右心室容积的黄金标准,而右心室容积是法洛氏四联症(rTOF)修复患者临床管理的关键。有人提出了基于阈值的半自动方法(SAT)用于 CMR 后处理,以替代全手工标准描记。我们研究了 SAT 使用不同阈值对 rTOF 患者 RV 分析的影响:方法:使用 SAT 和标准全手动描记方法估算 rTOF 患者的 RV 容量和质量。为 SAT 设定了两个阈值水平,即默认值 50(SAT-50)和 30(SAT-30)。将 RV 搏出量(SV)与主肺动脉前向血流(MPA-FF)进行比较。比较了不同方法的后处理时间、观察者内部和观察者之间的差异:对 62 例 rTOF 患者的 CMR 进行了分析。与标准的全手动描记相比,使用 SAT-30 观察到的 RV 质量、容积和射血分数无明显差异,而 SAT-50 则明显低估了 RV 舒张末期容积指数(EDVi)10.4%(平均差异为 - 11.8 ± 6.2 ml/m2,P 0.03),高估了 RV 质量指数 21.8%(平均差异为 14.2 ± 11.9 g/m2,P 0.002)。与 MPA-FF 相比,标准全手工方法和 SAT-30 的 RVSV 偏差较小,分别为 0.03 ml/m2 和 0.7 ml/m2,而 SAT-50 则低估了 RVSV 6.86 ml/m2(p 结论:MPA-FF 和 SAT-30 的 RVSV 偏差较小,分别为 0.03 ml/m2 和 0.7 ml/m2:CMR SAT-30 后处理是在 rTOF 中评估双心室容积、射血分数和质量的一种精确、准确和省时的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiologia Medica
Radiologia Medica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
7.90%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Felice Perussia founded La radiologia medica in 1914. It is a peer-reviewed journal and serves as the official journal of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM). The primary purpose of the journal is to disseminate information related to Radiology, especially advancements in diagnostic imaging and related disciplines. La radiologia medica welcomes original research on both fundamental and clinical aspects of modern radiology, with a particular focus on diagnostic and interventional imaging techniques. It also covers topics such as radiotherapy, nuclear medicine, radiobiology, health physics, and artificial intelligence in the context of clinical implications. The journal includes various types of contributions such as original articles, review articles, editorials, short reports, and letters to the editor. With an esteemed Editorial Board and a selection of insightful reports, the journal is an indispensable resource for radiologists and professionals in related fields. Ultimately, La radiologia medica aims to serve as a platform for international collaboration and knowledge sharing within the radiological community.
期刊最新文献
Automated detection of bone lesions using CT and MRI: a systematic review. Left radial vs right femoral: comparison between arterial accesses in c-TACE procedures in terms of operator radiations exposure and patient comfort. Are background breast parenchymal features on preoperative breast MRI associated with disease-free survival in patients with invasive breast cancer? The missed chapter on midfoot: Chopart injuries. A preliminary study of developing an MRI-based model for postoperative recurrence prediction and treatment direction of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1