Prediction of Hospital Readmission Using the CORE and CORE+ Scores in Persons With COPD.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Respiratory care Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.4187/respcare.11766
Ahmad A Elshafei, Guy Nehrenz, Patrick C Hardigan, Ellen A Becker
{"title":"Prediction of Hospital Readmission Using the CORE and CORE+ Scores in Persons With COPD.","authors":"Ahmad A Elshafei, Guy Nehrenz, Patrick C Hardigan, Ellen A Becker","doi":"10.4187/respcare.11766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Identifying persons with COPD at high risk for hospital readmission provides opportunities for efficient and appropriate care to lower readmission risk. This study examined 30-d and 60-d hospital readmission prediction of the COPD-readmission (CORE) score and a newly developed CORE+ score. The relationship between CORE and CORE+ scores and ICU admission, endotracheal intubation, and in-hospital noninvasive ventilation (NIV) use was explored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study evaluated participants with spirometry-confirmed COPD from 2 Midwestern academic hospitals. The CORE score variables included eosinophil blood count, FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC (<0.70) and FEV<sub>1</sub> (≤40% of predicted), triple inhaler therapy, previous hospitalization, and presence of neuromuscular disease. Out-of-hospital NIV use and Charlson comorbidity index were added to compose the CORE+ score. Researchers assessed associations between variables and outcomes with chi-square test or Fisher exact test, compared results of CORE and CORE+ scores with Wilcoxon signed-rank test, assessed each score's 30-d and 60-d readmission predictive power with multiple logistic regression, and evaluated predictive accuracy with AUC of receiver operating characteristic using alpha < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 391 participants, the study found a 22% 30-d, all-cause readmission rate and a 16% 60-d, all-cause readmission rate. CORE+ score had better predictive accuracy than the CORE score for 30-d readmission (area under the curve 0.81 [95% CI 0.76-0.86]; AUC 0.73 [95% CI 0.66-0.79], <i>P</i> < .001) and 60-d readmission (AUC 0.77 [95% CI 0.71-0.83]; AUC 0.75 [95% CI 0.69-0.81], <i>P</i> < .001). Participants who used in-hospital NIV had higher median CORE+ scores (<i>P</i> = < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CORE and CORE+ scores demonstrated good to very good predictive accuracy for 30-d and 60-d readmission, respectively. Moreover, this study demonstrated a linear relationship between in-hospital NIV use and CORE+ score.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.11766","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Identifying persons with COPD at high risk for hospital readmission provides opportunities for efficient and appropriate care to lower readmission risk. This study examined 30-d and 60-d hospital readmission prediction of the COPD-readmission (CORE) score and a newly developed CORE+ score. The relationship between CORE and CORE+ scores and ICU admission, endotracheal intubation, and in-hospital noninvasive ventilation (NIV) use was explored.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study evaluated participants with spirometry-confirmed COPD from 2 Midwestern academic hospitals. The CORE score variables included eosinophil blood count, FEV1/FVC (<0.70) and FEV1 (≤40% of predicted), triple inhaler therapy, previous hospitalization, and presence of neuromuscular disease. Out-of-hospital NIV use and Charlson comorbidity index were added to compose the CORE+ score. Researchers assessed associations between variables and outcomes with chi-square test or Fisher exact test, compared results of CORE and CORE+ scores with Wilcoxon signed-rank test, assessed each score's 30-d and 60-d readmission predictive power with multiple logistic regression, and evaluated predictive accuracy with AUC of receiver operating characteristic using alpha < 0.05.

Results: Of 391 participants, the study found a 22% 30-d, all-cause readmission rate and a 16% 60-d, all-cause readmission rate. CORE+ score had better predictive accuracy than the CORE score for 30-d readmission (area under the curve 0.81 [95% CI 0.76-0.86]; AUC 0.73 [95% CI 0.66-0.79], P < .001) and 60-d readmission (AUC 0.77 [95% CI 0.71-0.83]; AUC 0.75 [95% CI 0.69-0.81], P < .001). Participants who used in-hospital NIV had higher median CORE+ scores (P = < .001).

Conclusions: CORE and CORE+ scores demonstrated good to very good predictive accuracy for 30-d and 60-d readmission, respectively. Moreover, this study demonstrated a linear relationship between in-hospital NIV use and CORE+ score.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用 CORE 和 CORE+ 评分预测慢性阻塞性肺病患者的再入院情况。
背景:识别慢性阻塞性肺病患者再入院的高风险为提供高效、适当的护理以降低再入院风险提供了机会。本研究对慢性阻塞性肺病再入院(CORE)评分和新开发的 CORE+ 评分的 30 天和 60 天再入院预测进行了研究。研究还探讨了 CORE 和 CORE+ 评分与入住 ICU、气管插管和使用院内无创通气(NIV)之间的关系:一项回顾性队列研究对来自美国中西部两家学术医院、经肺活量测定证实患有慢性阻塞性肺病的患者进行了评估。CORE评分变量包括嗜酸性粒细胞血细胞计数、FEV1/FVC(1(≤预测值的40%)、三重吸入器治疗、既往住院情况以及是否患有神经肌肉疾病。院外 NIV 使用情况和 Charlson 合并症指数共同组成了 CORE+ 评分。研究人员采用卡方检验或费舍尔精确检验评估了变量与结果之间的关联,采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较了CORE和CORE+评分的结果,采用多元逻辑回归评估了每个评分的30天和60天再入院预测能力,并采用接受者操作特征AUC评估了预测准确性(α<0.05):研究发现,在391名参与者中,30天后全因再入院率为22%,60天后全因再入院率为16%。与CORE评分相比,CORE+评分对30天再入院(曲线下面积0.81 [95% CI 0.76-0.86];AUC 0.73 [95% CI 0.66-0.79],P < .001)和60天再入院(AUC 0.77 [95% CI 0.71-0.83];AUC 0.75 [95% CI 0.69-0.81],P < .001)的预测准确性更高。使用院内 NIV 的参与者的 CORE+ 评分中位数更高(P = < .001):结论:CORE和CORE+评分对30天和60天再入院的预测准确性分别为良好和非常好。此外,本研究还证明了院内 NIV 使用与 CORE+ 评分之间的线性关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
期刊最新文献
Effects of Positive Expiratory Pressure Device on Gas Exchange, Atelectasis, Hemodynamics, and Dyspnea in Spontaneously Breathing Critically Ill Subjects. Respiratory Therapy Leaders' Perceptions of Value of Respiratory Care Services. Ventilation Monitoring Using a Noninvasive Bioelectrical Impedance Device in Critically Ill Children. Effect of Continuous Lateral Rotation Therapy on Clinical Outcomes in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Adults. Maintenance Inhalers for Asthma and COPD in Spain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1