Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes in Kienbock Disease Following Radial Closing Wedge Osteotomy: An Age Comparative Study and Literature Review.

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS JBJS Open Access Pub Date : 2024-10-30 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00066
Takeru Yokota, Soichi Ejiri, Nobuyuki Sasaki, Yuto Akiyama, Narihiro Toshiki, Takuya Kameda, Yoshihiro Matsumoto
{"title":"Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes in Kienbock Disease Following Radial Closing Wedge Osteotomy: An Age Comparative Study and Literature Review.","authors":"Takeru Yokota, Soichi Ejiri, Nobuyuki Sasaki, Yuto Akiyama, Narihiro Toshiki, Takuya Kameda, Yoshihiro Matsumoto","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Age is a preoperative prognostic factor for radial closing wedge osteotomy (RCWO) in Kienbock disease. Specifically, for cases classified as Lichtman stage III, clear criteria for selecting RCWO have not been established. We believe that age can provide vital information for determining the appropriate surgical procedure for Kienbock disease. The aim of this study was to investigate RCWO outcomes for Lichtman stage III by examining different age groups from clinical and radiological perspectives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixteen patients with Lichtman stage III Kienbock disease underwent RCWO. The median age was 59 years, and the median follow-up period was 2.9 years. We determined the age cutoffs for clinical and radiological outcomes using a receiver operating characteristic curve. Subsequently, we conducted intergroup comparisons of postoperative outcomes between the younger and older age groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age cutoffs were established at 52.5 and 30 years for clinical and radiological outcomes, respectively. In the comparative analysis, the younger age group (≤52 years; n = 7) demonstrated significantly superior clinical results, including improved range of motion and pain relief, higher postoperative Mayo Wrist Score, and lower Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores. From a radiological perspective, the younger age group (≤30 years; n = 3) experienced segmented lunate bone fragments healing, indicating an improved disease stage compared with the older group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on previous literature and our research findings, it is reasonable to conclude that RCWO results in improved clinical outcomes for patients up to their mid-50s and enhanced radiological outcomes for those up to approximately at the age of 30 years. Further studies on these age cutoffs will contribute to refining the surgical selection criteria for RCWO.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11519403/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Age is a preoperative prognostic factor for radial closing wedge osteotomy (RCWO) in Kienbock disease. Specifically, for cases classified as Lichtman stage III, clear criteria for selecting RCWO have not been established. We believe that age can provide vital information for determining the appropriate surgical procedure for Kienbock disease. The aim of this study was to investigate RCWO outcomes for Lichtman stage III by examining different age groups from clinical and radiological perspectives.

Methods: Sixteen patients with Lichtman stage III Kienbock disease underwent RCWO. The median age was 59 years, and the median follow-up period was 2.9 years. We determined the age cutoffs for clinical and radiological outcomes using a receiver operating characteristic curve. Subsequently, we conducted intergroup comparisons of postoperative outcomes between the younger and older age groups.

Results: Age cutoffs were established at 52.5 and 30 years for clinical and radiological outcomes, respectively. In the comparative analysis, the younger age group (≤52 years; n = 7) demonstrated significantly superior clinical results, including improved range of motion and pain relief, higher postoperative Mayo Wrist Score, and lower Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores. From a radiological perspective, the younger age group (≤30 years; n = 3) experienced segmented lunate bone fragments healing, indicating an improved disease stage compared with the older group.

Conclusion: Based on previous literature and our research findings, it is reasonable to conclude that RCWO results in improved clinical outcomes for patients up to their mid-50s and enhanced radiological outcomes for those up to approximately at the age of 30 years. Further studies on these age cutoffs will contribute to refining the surgical selection criteria for RCWO.

Level of evidence: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
桡骨闭合楔形截骨术后 Kienbock 病的临床和影像学结果:年龄比较研究与文献综述。
背景:年龄是基恩博克病桡骨闭合楔形截骨术(RCWO)的术前预后因素。特别是对于 Lichtman III 期病例,选择 RCWO 的明确标准尚未确立。我们认为,年龄可以为确定治疗基恩博克病的适当手术方法提供重要信息。本研究的目的是从临床和放射学的角度研究不同年龄组的 Lichtman III 期患者的 RCWO 结果:16名Lichtman III期Kienbock病患者接受了RCWO手术。中位年龄为 59 岁,中位随访时间为 2.9 年。我们利用接收器操作特征曲线确定了临床和放射学结果的年龄分界线。随后,我们对年轻组和老年组的术后结果进行了组间比较:结果:临床和放射学结果的年龄分界线分别定为 52.5 岁和 30 岁。在比较分析中,年轻组(≤52 岁;n = 7)的临床结果明显优于年龄组,包括活动范围改善、疼痛缓解、术后梅奥腕关节评分提高以及手臂、肩部和手部残疾评分降低。从放射学角度来看,年轻组(≤30 岁;n = 3)的新月形骨片段愈合,表明疾病阶段较老年组有所改善:根据以往的文献和我们的研究结果,可以合理地得出结论:RCWO 可改善 50 岁以下中年患者的临床疗效,提高 30 岁以下患者的放射疗效。对这些年龄分界线的进一步研究将有助于完善RCWO的手术选择标准:预后IV级。有关证据级别的完整描述,请参阅 "作者须知"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JBJS Open Access
JBJS Open Access Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes in Kienbock Disease Following Radial Closing Wedge Osteotomy: An Age Comparative Study and Literature Review. The Effect of a Flipped Classroom Didactic Curriculum on Orthopaedic In-Training Examination Scores for a Resident Cohort. Can Artificial Intelligence Fool Residency Selection Committees? Analysis of Personal Statements by Real Applicants and Generative AI, a Randomized, Single-Blind Multicenter Study. Research Fellowships for Unmatched Orthopaedic Applicants: What Can They Expect? Disparities in Rotator Cuff Tear Progression Definitions and Rates: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1