Impact of Postoperative Neck Radiotherapy Volumes on Long-Term Unstimulated Saliva Flow Following Primary Surgery and Ipsilateral Neck Dissection for Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1002/hed.27988
Claire M Rooney, Shao Hui Huang, Jie Su, Scott Bratman, John Cho, John de Almeida, Michael Glogauer, David Goldstein, Ezra Hahn, Ali Hosni, Andrew Hope, Jonathan Irish, John Kim, Brian O'Sullivan, Jolie Ringash, Anna Spreafico, Jillian Tsai, John Waldron, Christopher Yao, Erin Watson, Andrew McPartlin
{"title":"Impact of Postoperative Neck Radiotherapy Volumes on Long-Term Unstimulated Saliva Flow Following Primary Surgery and Ipsilateral Neck Dissection for Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma.","authors":"Claire M Rooney, Shao Hui Huang, Jie Su, Scott Bratman, John Cho, John de Almeida, Michael Glogauer, David Goldstein, Ezra Hahn, Ali Hosni, Andrew Hope, Jonathan Irish, John Kim, Brian O'Sullivan, Jolie Ringash, Anna Spreafico, Jillian Tsai, John Waldron, Christopher Yao, Erin Watson, Andrew McPartlin","doi":"10.1002/hed.27988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We investigate the association of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) volumes and salivary function in oral cavity SCC (OSCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>OSCC patients undergoing PORT 2005-2021 underwent modified Schirmer test (MST) pre-PORT, 6 and/or 12 months post-PORT. Hyposalivation rates were compared by PORT volumes. MVA identified predictors for chronic hyposalivation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 165 eligible patients, 88 (53%) received bilateral, 66 (40%) ipsilateral, and 11 (7%) no-neck (primary-only) PORT. Baseline characteristics were similar, except more N2b/N2c disease received bilateral PORT vs. ipsilateral or no-neck (60% vs. 36% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). Baseline hyposalivation was similar (26% vs. 30% vs. 18%, p = 0.67). Hyposalivation occurred more frequently in bilateral vs. ipsilateral vs. no-neck PORT at 6 (90% vs. 62% vs. 9%) and 12 months (90% vs. 48% vs. 0%) (both p < 0.001). On MVA, bilateral neck PORT and smoking predicted chronic hyposalivation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Increasing PORT volumes predict saliva function recovery and chronic hyposalivation, informing treatment discussions.</p>","PeriodicalId":55072,"journal":{"name":"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.27988","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We investigate the association of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) volumes and salivary function in oral cavity SCC (OSCC).

Methods: OSCC patients undergoing PORT 2005-2021 underwent modified Schirmer test (MST) pre-PORT, 6 and/or 12 months post-PORT. Hyposalivation rates were compared by PORT volumes. MVA identified predictors for chronic hyposalivation.

Results: Among 165 eligible patients, 88 (53%) received bilateral, 66 (40%) ipsilateral, and 11 (7%) no-neck (primary-only) PORT. Baseline characteristics were similar, except more N2b/N2c disease received bilateral PORT vs. ipsilateral or no-neck (60% vs. 36% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). Baseline hyposalivation was similar (26% vs. 30% vs. 18%, p = 0.67). Hyposalivation occurred more frequently in bilateral vs. ipsilateral vs. no-neck PORT at 6 (90% vs. 62% vs. 9%) and 12 months (90% vs. 48% vs. 0%) (both p < 0.001). On MVA, bilateral neck PORT and smoking predicted chronic hyposalivation.

Conclusion: Increasing PORT volumes predict saliva function recovery and chronic hyposalivation, informing treatment discussions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口腔鳞状细胞癌初次手术和同侧颈部切除术后颈部放疗量对长期未刺激唾液流量的影响
背景:我们研究了口腔SCC(OSCC)术后放疗量(PORT)与唾液功能的关系:我们研究了口腔SCC(OSCC)术后放疗(PORT)量与唾液功能的关系:2005-2021年接受PORT治疗的OSCC患者在PORT前、PORT后6个月和/或12个月接受了改良席尔默试验(MST)。根据 PORT 容量比较唾液分泌过少率。MVA确定了慢性唾液分泌过少的预测因素:在 165 名符合条件的患者中,88 人(53%)接受了双侧 PORT,66 人(40%)接受了同侧 PORT,11 人(7%)接受了无颈部 PORT(仅初级)。基线特征相似,但更多的 N2b/N2c 疾病患者接受了双侧 PORT 而不是同侧或无颈(60% vs. 36% vs. 0%, p 结论:PORT 容量的增加可预测唾液功能:PORT 容量的增加可预测唾液功能的恢复和慢性唾液分泌过少的情况,为治疗方案的讨论提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
278
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Head & Neck is an international multidisciplinary publication of original contributions concerning the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck. This area involves the overlapping interests and expertise of several surgical and medical specialties, including general surgery, neurosurgery, otolaryngology, plastic surgery, oral surgery, dermatology, ophthalmology, pathology, radiotherapy, medical oncology, and the corresponding basic sciences.
期刊最新文献
Radiation-Induced Pharyngeal Necrosis and Cervical Spine Osteoradionecrosis in Patients With Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Anatomy and Histology of Sensorimotor Connections Between the Facial and Trigeminal Nerve in the Buccinator Muscle. A Review of Contemporary Image Guidance Techniques in Head and Neck Cancer. Recurrent Patterns in Patients With Nasopharyngeal Caricinoma and Risks Leading to Inaccurate Delineation in Marginal Failure in the Era of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy. Impact of Transoral Robotic Surgery Versus Radiation on Swallowing Function in Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients: A Sub-Study From a Randomized Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1