Quantifying measurement uncertainty in renal transplant biopsy assessment.

Frontiers in nephrology Pub Date : 2024-10-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fneph.2024.1458491
Xavier Loizeau, Marina Romanchikova, Spencer A Thomas, Moulham Alsuleman, John O O Ayorinde, Gavin J Pettigrew
{"title":"Quantifying measurement uncertainty in renal transplant biopsy assessment.","authors":"Xavier Loizeau, Marina Romanchikova, Spencer A Thomas, Moulham Alsuleman, John O O Ayorinde, Gavin J Pettigrew","doi":"10.3389/fneph.2024.1458491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Renal transplant biopsies provide insights into graft health and support decision making. The current evidence on links between biopsy scores and transplant outcomes suggests there may be numerous factors affecting biopsy scores. Here we adopt measurement science approach to investigate the sources of uncertainty in biopsy assessment and suggest techniques to improve its robustness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Histological assessments, Remuzzi scores, biopsy processing and clinical variables are obtained from 144 repeat biopsies originating from 16 deceased-donor kidneys. We conducted sensitivity analysis to find the morphometric features with highest discriminating power and studied the dependencies of these features on biopsy and stain type. The analysis results formed a basis for recommendations on reducing the assessment variability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most morphometric variables are influenced by the biopsy and stain types. The variables with the highest discriminatory power are sclerotic glomeruli counts, healthy glomeruli counts per unit area, percentages of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy as well as diameter and lumen of the worst artery. A revised glomeruli adequacy score is proposed to improve the robustness of the glomeruli statistics, whereby a minimum of 104 µm<sup>2</sup> of cortex tissue is recommended to keep type 1 and type 2 error probabilities below 0.15 and 0.2.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings are transferable to several biopsy scoring systems. We hope that this work will help practitioners to understand the sources of statistical uncertainty and improve the utility of renal biopsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":73091,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in nephrology","volume":"4 ","pages":"1458491"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11519413/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneph.2024.1458491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Renal transplant biopsies provide insights into graft health and support decision making. The current evidence on links between biopsy scores and transplant outcomes suggests there may be numerous factors affecting biopsy scores. Here we adopt measurement science approach to investigate the sources of uncertainty in biopsy assessment and suggest techniques to improve its robustness.

Methods: Histological assessments, Remuzzi scores, biopsy processing and clinical variables are obtained from 144 repeat biopsies originating from 16 deceased-donor kidneys. We conducted sensitivity analysis to find the morphometric features with highest discriminating power and studied the dependencies of these features on biopsy and stain type. The analysis results formed a basis for recommendations on reducing the assessment variability.

Results: Most morphometric variables are influenced by the biopsy and stain types. The variables with the highest discriminatory power are sclerotic glomeruli counts, healthy glomeruli counts per unit area, percentages of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy as well as diameter and lumen of the worst artery. A revised glomeruli adequacy score is proposed to improve the robustness of the glomeruli statistics, whereby a minimum of 104 µm2 of cortex tissue is recommended to keep type 1 and type 2 error probabilities below 0.15 and 0.2.

Discussion: The findings are transferable to several biopsy scoring systems. We hope that this work will help practitioners to understand the sources of statistical uncertainty and improve the utility of renal biopsy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
量化肾移植活检评估中的测量不确定性。
导言:肾移植活检有助于了解移植物的健康状况并支持决策。目前关于活检评分与移植结果之间联系的证据表明,影响活检评分的因素可能很多。在此,我们采用测量科学的方法来研究活检评估不确定性的来源,并提出提高其稳健性的技术建议。方法:我们从来自 16 个已故供体肾脏的 144 例重复活检中获得了组织学评估、Remuzzi 评分、活检处理和临床变量。我们进行了敏感性分析,以找出具有最高鉴别力的形态特征,并研究了这些特征与活检和染色类型的相关性。分析结果为降低评估变异性的建议提供了依据:结果:大多数形态测量变量都受到活检和染色类型的影响。分辨能力最强的变量是硬化肾小球计数、单位面积健康肾小球计数、间质纤维化和肾小管萎缩的百分比以及最差动脉的直径和管腔。为提高肾小球统计的稳健性,建议修订肾小球充足性评分,建议皮质组织最小为 104 µm2,以将类型 1 和类型 2 误差概率保持在 0.15 和 0.2 以下:讨论:研究结果可应用于多种活检评分系统。我们希望这项工作能帮助从业人员了解统计不确定性的来源,提高肾活检的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Vascular injury in glomerulopathies: the role of the endothelium. Editorial: Insights in glomerular disease. The Janus-faced nature of complement in hemodialysis: interplay between complement, inflammation, and bioincompatibility unveiling a self-amplifying loop contributing to organ damage. Comparative iron management in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients: a systematic review. Analyzing body composition in living kidney donors: impact on post-transplant kidney function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1