RDoC Framework Through the Lens of Predictive Processing: Focusing on Cognitive Systems Domain.

Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.) Pub Date : 2024-10-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5334/cpsy.119
Anahita Khorrami Banaraki, Armin Toghi, Azar Mohammadzadeh
{"title":"RDoC Framework Through the Lens of Predictive Processing: Focusing on Cognitive Systems Domain.","authors":"Anahita Khorrami Banaraki, Armin Toghi, Azar Mohammadzadeh","doi":"10.5334/cpsy.119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In response to shortcomings of the current classification system in translating discoveries from basic science to clinical applications, NIMH offers a new framework for studying mental health disorders called Research Domain Criteria (RDoC). This framework holds a multidimensional outlook on psychopathologies focusing on functional domains of behavior and their implementing neural circuits. In parallel, the Predictive Processing (PP) framework stands as a leading theory of human brain function, offering a unified explanation for various types of information processing in the brain. While both frameworks share an interest in studying psychopathologies based on pathophysiology, their integration still needs to be explored. Here, we argued in favor of the explanatory power of PP to be a groundwork for the RDoC matrix in validating its constructs and creating testable hypotheses about mechanistic interactions between molecular biomarkers and clinical traits. Together, predictive processing may serve as a foundation for achieving the goals of the RDoC framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":72664,"journal":{"name":"Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.)","volume":"8 1","pages":"178-201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11523845/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/cpsy.119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In response to shortcomings of the current classification system in translating discoveries from basic science to clinical applications, NIMH offers a new framework for studying mental health disorders called Research Domain Criteria (RDoC). This framework holds a multidimensional outlook on psychopathologies focusing on functional domains of behavior and their implementing neural circuits. In parallel, the Predictive Processing (PP) framework stands as a leading theory of human brain function, offering a unified explanation for various types of information processing in the brain. While both frameworks share an interest in studying psychopathologies based on pathophysiology, their integration still needs to be explored. Here, we argued in favor of the explanatory power of PP to be a groundwork for the RDoC matrix in validating its constructs and creating testable hypotheses about mechanistic interactions between molecular biomarkers and clinical traits. Together, predictive processing may serve as a foundation for achieving the goals of the RDoC framework.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从预测处理的角度看 RDoC 框架:聚焦认知系统领域。
针对现行分类系统在将基础科学发现转化为临床应用方面存在的不足,美国国立卫生研究院(NIMH)提出了一个研究精神疾病的新框架,称为研究领域标准(RDoC)。该框架从多维度看待精神病理学,重点关注行为的功能领域及其实施神经回路。与此同时,预测处理(PP)框架作为人类大脑功能的领先理论,为大脑中各种类型的信息处理提供了统一的解释。虽然这两个框架都希望在病理生理学的基础上研究精神病理学,但它们之间的融合仍有待探索。在此,我们支持预测处理的解释能力,认为它是 RDoC 矩阵的基础,可以验证其构造,并就分子生物标志物与临床特征之间的机理相互作用提出可检验的假设。总之,预测性处理可作为实现 RDoC 框架目标的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
An Active Inference Model of the Optimism Bias. Correction: Decision-Making, Pro-variance Biases and Mood-Related Traits. Test-Retest Reliability of Two Computationally-Characterised Affective Bias Tasks. Transdiagnostic Anxiety-Related Increases in Information Sampling are Associated With Altered Valuation. RDoC Framework Through the Lens of Predictive Processing: Focusing on Cognitive Systems Domain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1