Comparison of postoperative outcomes between different dissection techniques during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in rabbits: randomized study.

Acta cirurgica brasileira Pub Date : 2024-10-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/acb396324
María Camila Maldonado Vera, Monica Carolina Nery Wittmaack, Maria Eduarda Bastos Andrade Moutinho Conceição, Rachel Inamassu Faccini, Guilherme Sembenelli, Gabriel Luiz Montanhim, Mareliza Possa de Menezes, Cléber Kazuo Ido, Luiz Paulo Nogueira Aires, Gabriel João Unger Carra, Paola Castro Moraes
{"title":"Comparison of postoperative outcomes between different dissection techniques during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in rabbits: randomized study.","authors":"María Camila Maldonado Vera, Monica Carolina Nery Wittmaack, Maria Eduarda Bastos Andrade Moutinho Conceição, Rachel Inamassu Faccini, Guilherme Sembenelli, Gabriel Luiz Montanhim, Mareliza Possa de Menezes, Cléber Kazuo Ido, Luiz Paulo Nogueira Aires, Gabriel João Unger Carra, Paola Castro Moraes","doi":"10.1590/acb396324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard for the treatment of gallbladder (GB) disease in small animals. The aims of this study were to investigate and compare the effect of different types of dissectors during LC in rabbits; electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing device (EBVS-LigaSure) and standard electrosurgical dissection (bipolar Maryland) for dissection of the GB in LC, correlating liver function tests (LFTs) in pre and postoperative periods (days 0, 3, 7, 15); macroscopic checking 15 days after surgery through necropsy; histopathological, bacteriological through bacterial growth by culture and intraoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty rabbits were used, group (n = 10) using EBVS for GB dissection and cystic duct seal (GLL), and group (n = 10) using bipolar dissecting forceps and EVBS for cystic duct seal (GLE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A higher concentration of alkaline phosphatase was observed on GLL 15 days after surgery when compared to GLE. In addition, GLE resulted in a higher concentration of alanine aminotransferase at three days when compared to GLL.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In LC no significant statistical differences were found between EBVS and bipolar Maryland; both devices are equally safe and effective in LC. Further studies are required to evaluate the effectiveness of these devices in animals with gallbladder pathologies. Therefore, clinical studies are necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":93850,"journal":{"name":"Acta cirurgica brasileira","volume":"39 ","pages":"e396324"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11506700/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta cirurgica brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/acb396324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard for the treatment of gallbladder (GB) disease in small animals. The aims of this study were to investigate and compare the effect of different types of dissectors during LC in rabbits; electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing device (EBVS-LigaSure) and standard electrosurgical dissection (bipolar Maryland) for dissection of the GB in LC, correlating liver function tests (LFTs) in pre and postoperative periods (days 0, 3, 7, 15); macroscopic checking 15 days after surgery through necropsy; histopathological, bacteriological through bacterial growth by culture and intraoperative complications.

Methods: Twenty rabbits were used, group (n = 10) using EBVS for GB dissection and cystic duct seal (GLL), and group (n = 10) using bipolar dissecting forceps and EVBS for cystic duct seal (GLE).

Results: A higher concentration of alkaline phosphatase was observed on GLL 15 days after surgery when compared to GLE. In addition, GLE resulted in a higher concentration of alanine aminotransferase at three days when compared to GLL.

Conclusion: In LC no significant statistical differences were found between EBVS and bipolar Maryland; both devices are equally safe and effective in LC. Further studies are required to evaluate the effectiveness of these devices in animals with gallbladder pathologies. Therefore, clinical studies are necessary.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较兔子腹腔镜胆囊切除术中不同解剖技术的术后效果:随机研究。
目的:腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)是治疗小动物胆囊疾病的金标准。本研究的目的是调查和比较不同类型的解剖器在兔子腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的效果;电热双极血管密封装置(EBVS-LigaSure)和标准电外科解剖器(双极马里兰)在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中解剖胆囊的效果,并对术前和术后(第 0、3、7、15 天)的肝功能检测(LFTs)进行相关分析;术后 15 天通过尸体解剖进行宏观检查;组织病理学、细菌培养和术中并发症。方法使用 20 只兔子,一组(n = 10)使用 EBVS 进行 GB 剥离和囊管封堵(GLL),另一组(n = 10)使用双极剥离钳和 EVBS 进行囊管封堵(GLE):结果:与 GLE 相比,术后 15 天 GLL 观察到的碱性磷酸酶浓度更高。此外,与 GLL 相比,GLE 在术后 3 天的丙氨酸氨基转移酶浓度更高:在 LC 中,EBVS 和双极 Maryland 之间没有发现明显的统计学差异;这两种设备在 LC 中同样安全有效。还需要进一步研究,以评估这些装置对胆囊病变动物的有效性。因此,有必要进行临床研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and safety of remimazolam besylate and ciprofol in painless gastrointestinal endoscopy in the elderly. Comparison of the therapeutic effects of different pneumoperitoneum pressures on laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair: a randomized controlled trail. Pharmacological effects of triamcinolone associated with surgical glue on cutaneous wound healing in rats. Brazilian authorship gender trends on academic surgery: a bigdata analysis. Cesarean scar dehiscence in early puerperium and influence of barbed suture: tridimensional ultrasound evaluation in a randomized clinical study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1