Efficacy and Safety of Barbed Sutures for Capsulorrhaphy in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.

Eplasty Pub Date : 2024-09-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01
Madison Rose Tyle, Matthew Nester, Mariel McLaughlin, Amra Olafson, Nicole K Le, Kristen Whalen, Cameron Juybari, Emily Coughlin, Rahul Mhaskar, Paul D Smith, Deniz Dayicioglu
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Barbed Sutures for Capsulorrhaphy in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.","authors":"Madison Rose Tyle, Matthew Nester, Mariel McLaughlin, Amra Olafson, Nicole K Le, Kristen Whalen, Cameron Juybari, Emily Coughlin, Rahul Mhaskar, Paul D Smith, Deniz Dayicioglu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A common postoperative challenge following implant-based breast reconstruction surgery is lateral or inferior displacement of the implant, which ultimately requires surgical intervention to shape the pocket for improved symmetry. Capsulorrhaphy is traditionally performed with smooth sutures, but the use of barbed sutures has proven to be more efficient and effective in other plastic surgery procedures. This study aimed to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of barbed sutures for breast reconstruction implant capsulorrhaphy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was performed including all consecutive patients who underwent capsulorrhaphy by the senior author utilizing barbed sutures and, for comparison, another colleague utilizing smooth sutures from the years 2018-2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight patients were identified who underwent barbed suture capsulorrhaphy (a total of 36 breasts operated on), which was compared with 20 patients who had smooth suture capsulorrhaphy (a total of 34 breasts operated on). The average ages of the barbed and smooth suture cohorts were 55 and 53 years old (<i>P</i> = 1.00), respectively. The average BMI of the barbed and smooth suture cohorts were 26.7 and 25.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (<i>P</i> = .15), respectively. The reoperation rates for both groups were similar at 5%. Overall complication rate was 13.9% in the barbed suture group and 8.8% in the smooth suture group, which was not statistically significant (<i>P</i> = .71). Patients with barbed sutures did not have an increased risk of complications compared with those who received smooth sutures (OR 1.67 (0.37-7.59), <i>P</i> = .51).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, performing implant-based breast reconstruction capsulorrhaphy with barbed sutures is a safe and effective procedure as compared with smooth sutures.</p>","PeriodicalId":93993,"journal":{"name":"Eplasty","volume":"24 ","pages":"e50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520367/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A common postoperative challenge following implant-based breast reconstruction surgery is lateral or inferior displacement of the implant, which ultimately requires surgical intervention to shape the pocket for improved symmetry. Capsulorrhaphy is traditionally performed with smooth sutures, but the use of barbed sutures has proven to be more efficient and effective in other plastic surgery procedures. This study aimed to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of barbed sutures for breast reconstruction implant capsulorrhaphy.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed including all consecutive patients who underwent capsulorrhaphy by the senior author utilizing barbed sutures and, for comparison, another colleague utilizing smooth sutures from the years 2018-2021.

Results: Twenty-eight patients were identified who underwent barbed suture capsulorrhaphy (a total of 36 breasts operated on), which was compared with 20 patients who had smooth suture capsulorrhaphy (a total of 34 breasts operated on). The average ages of the barbed and smooth suture cohorts were 55 and 53 years old (P = 1.00), respectively. The average BMI of the barbed and smooth suture cohorts were 26.7 and 25.0 kg/m2 (P = .15), respectively. The reoperation rates for both groups were similar at 5%. Overall complication rate was 13.9% in the barbed suture group and 8.8% in the smooth suture group, which was not statistically significant (P = .71). Patients with barbed sutures did not have an increased risk of complications compared with those who received smooth sutures (OR 1.67 (0.37-7.59), P = .51).

Conclusions: In conclusion, performing implant-based breast reconstruction capsulorrhaphy with barbed sutures is a safe and effective procedure as compared with smooth sutures.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在植入物乳房再造术中使用带刺缝合线进行囊腔出血的有效性和安全性。
背景:假体乳房再造手术后常见的术后难题是假体向外侧或下侧移位,最终需要通过手术干预来塑造乳房袋,以改善对称性。囊袋成形术传统上使用平滑缝合线,但在其他整形手术中使用倒钩缝合线已被证明更有效率和效果。本研究旨在证明在乳房再造假体包膜成形术中使用倒钩缝合线的安全性和有效性:进行了一项回顾性队列研究,包括2018-2021年间由资深作者使用倒钩缝合线和另一位同事使用平滑缝合线进行巩膜成形术的所有连续患者:28名患者接受了倒钩缝合的囊肿切除术(共对36个乳房进行了手术),20名患者接受了平滑缝合的囊肿切除术(共对34个乳房进行了手术)。有倒刺和平滑缝合组的平均年龄分别为 55 岁和 53 岁(P = 1.00)。倒刺缝合组和平滑缝合组的平均体重指数分别为 26.7 kg/m2 和 25.0 kg/m2 (P = .15)。两组的再手术率相似,均为 5%。倒钩缝合组的总体并发症发生率为 13.9%,平滑缝合组为 8.8%,差异无统计学意义(P = .71)。与使用平滑缝线的患者相比,使用倒钩缝线的患者发生并发症的风险并没有增加(OR 1.67 (0.37-7.59),P = .51):总之,与平滑缝线相比,使用倒钩缝线进行假体乳房再造包膜环切术是一种安全有效的手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Tissue Expanders Filled With Saline Versus Air on Longitudinal Breast Reconstruction Outcomes. Not a Jersey Finger - A Case of a Closed Traumatic Rupture of the Small Finger Flexor Digitorum Profundus Tendon at the Lumbrical Origin. Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces for the Management of Symptomatic Non-extremity Neuropathic Pain and Neuromas. Clinical, Electrophysiological, and Intraoperative Analysis and Postoperative Success of Revision Surgery for Persistent and Recurrent Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Coincidence of Brachial Plexus Upper Trunk and Long Thoracic Nerve Injuries in 50 Patients With Winged Scapula: Improvements in Shoulder Stability and Functional Movements After Decompression and Neurolysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1