[18F]FDG and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04-Directed Imaging for Outcome Prediction in Patients with High-Grade Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

Kerstin Michalski, Aleksander Kosmala, Philipp E Hartrampf, Marieke Heinrich, Sebastian E Serfling, Wiebke Schlötelburg, Andreas K Buck, Alexander Meining, Rudolf A Werner, Alexander Weich
{"title":"[<sup>18</sup>F]FDG and [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04-Directed Imaging for Outcome Prediction in Patients with High-Grade Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.","authors":"Kerstin Michalski, Aleksander Kosmala, Philipp E Hartrampf, Marieke Heinrich, Sebastian E Serfling, Wiebke Schlötelburg, Andreas K Buck, Alexander Meining, Rudolf A Werner, Alexander Weich","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.124.268288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We aimed to quantitatively investigate the prognostic value of PET-based biomarkers on [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG and [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI)-04 PET/CT in patients with highly aggressive neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) and to compare the visually assessed differences in uptake on both examinations with progression-free survival (PFS). <b>Methods:</b> In this single-center retrospective analysis, 20 patients with high-grade NENs had undergone [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG and [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET. Both PET scans were visually compared, and the presence of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG-positive, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04-negative (FDG+/FAPI-) lesions was noted. In addition, we assessed maximum, peak, and mean SUV; tumor volume (TV); and total lesion uptake (TLU = TV × SUV<sub>mean</sub>) for both radiotracers using a 40% lesion-based threshold. The results of quantitative and visual analysis were correlated with PFS using log-rank analysis or univariate Cox regression. PFS was defined radiographically using RECIST 1.1., clinically using signs of disease progression, or as death. <b>Results:</b> Most primary tumors were located in the gastrointestinal tract (13/20 patients, 65%) or were cancer of unknown primary (5/20 patients, 25%). FDG+/FAPI- lesions were found in 9 of 20 patients (45%). Patients with FDG+/FAPI- lesions had a significantly decreased PFS of 4 mo, compared with 9 mo for patients without FDG+/FAPI- metastases (<i>P</i> = 0.0063 [log-rank test]; hazard ratio [HR], 5.637; 95% CI 1.619-26.16; <i>P</i> = 0.0110 [univariate Cox regression]). On univariate analysis, a significant correlation was also found between PFS and TV for both radiotracers ([<sup>18</sup>F]FDG: mean TV, 258 ± 588 cm<sup>3</sup>; HR, 1.024 [per 10 cm<sup>3</sup>]; 95% CI, 1.007-1.046; <i>P</i> = 0.0204) ([<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04: mean TV, 130 ± 192 cm<sup>3</sup>; HR, 1.032 [per 10 cm<sup>3</sup>]; 95% CI, 1.001-1.062; <i>P</i> = 0.0277) and TLU on [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET (mean TLU, 1,931 ± 4,248 cm<sup>3</sup>; HR, 1.004 [per 10 cm<sup>3</sup>]; 95% CI, 1.001-1.007; <i>P</i> = 0.0135). <b>Conclusion:</b> The presence of discordant FDG+/FAPI- lesions is associated with a significantly shorter PFS, which might indicate more aggressive disease prone to early progression. Dual-tracer PET/CT of patients with highly aggressive NENs could help guide treatment decisions or identify high-risk lesions for additional local therapeutic approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":94099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We aimed to quantitatively investigate the prognostic value of PET-based biomarkers on [18F]FDG and [68Ga]Ga-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI)-04 PET/CT in patients with highly aggressive neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) and to compare the visually assessed differences in uptake on both examinations with progression-free survival (PFS). Methods: In this single-center retrospective analysis, 20 patients with high-grade NENs had undergone [18F]FDG and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET. Both PET scans were visually compared, and the presence of [18F]FDG-positive, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04-negative (FDG+/FAPI-) lesions was noted. In addition, we assessed maximum, peak, and mean SUV; tumor volume (TV); and total lesion uptake (TLU = TV × SUVmean) for both radiotracers using a 40% lesion-based threshold. The results of quantitative and visual analysis were correlated with PFS using log-rank analysis or univariate Cox regression. PFS was defined radiographically using RECIST 1.1., clinically using signs of disease progression, or as death. Results: Most primary tumors were located in the gastrointestinal tract (13/20 patients, 65%) or were cancer of unknown primary (5/20 patients, 25%). FDG+/FAPI- lesions were found in 9 of 20 patients (45%). Patients with FDG+/FAPI- lesions had a significantly decreased PFS of 4 mo, compared with 9 mo for patients without FDG+/FAPI- metastases (P = 0.0063 [log-rank test]; hazard ratio [HR], 5.637; 95% CI 1.619-26.16; P = 0.0110 [univariate Cox regression]). On univariate analysis, a significant correlation was also found between PFS and TV for both radiotracers ([18F]FDG: mean TV, 258 ± 588 cm3; HR, 1.024 [per 10 cm3]; 95% CI, 1.007-1.046; P = 0.0204) ([68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04: mean TV, 130 ± 192 cm3; HR, 1.032 [per 10 cm3]; 95% CI, 1.001-1.062; P = 0.0277) and TLU on [18F]FDG PET (mean TLU, 1,931 ± 4,248 cm3; HR, 1.004 [per 10 cm3]; 95% CI, 1.001-1.007; P = 0.0135). Conclusion: The presence of discordant FDG+/FAPI- lesions is associated with a significantly shorter PFS, which might indicate more aggressive disease prone to early progression. Dual-tracer PET/CT of patients with highly aggressive NENs could help guide treatment decisions or identify high-risk lesions for additional local therapeutic approaches.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[18F]FDG和[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04引导成像预测高级别神经内分泌肿瘤患者的预后。
我们旨在对高度侵袭性神经内分泌肿瘤(NENs)患者的[18F]FDG和[68Ga]Ga-成纤维细胞活化蛋白抑制剂(FAPI)-04 PET/CT上基于PET的生物标志物的预后价值进行定量研究,并将这两种检查中肉眼评估的摄取差异与无进展生存期(PFS)进行比较。研究方法在这项单中心回顾性分析中,20名高级别NEN患者接受了[18F]FDG和[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET检查。对两种 PET 扫描结果进行视觉比较,并指出是否存在[18F]FDG 阳性、[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 阴性(FDG+/FAPI-)病变。此外,我们还评估了两种放射性核素的最大、峰值和平均 SUV、肿瘤体积(TV)和病灶总摄取量(TLU = TV × SUVmean),采用的是基于 40% 病灶的阈值。采用对数秩分析或单变量 Cox 回归将定量和视觉分析结果与 PFS 相关联。PFS 采用 RECIST 1.1 进行放射学定义,临床上采用疾病进展迹象或死亡进行定义。结果:大多数原发性肿瘤位于胃肠道(13/20 例患者,65%)或原发性不明的癌症(5/20 例患者,25%)。20例患者中有9例(45%)发现FDG+/FAPI-病变。FDG+/FAPI-病变患者的 PFS 为 4 个月,与无 FDG+/FAPI- 转移患者的 9 个月相比显著下降(P = 0.0063 [log-rank 检验];危险比 [HR],5.637;95% CI 1.619-26.16;P = 0.0110 [单变量 Cox 回归])。在单变量分析中,两种放射性同位素的 PFS 与 TV 之间也存在显著相关性([18F]FDG:平均 TV,258 ± 588 cm3;HR,1.024 [每 10 cm3];95% CI,1.007-1.046;P = 0.0204)([68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04:平均 TV,130 ± 192 cm3;HR,1.032 [每 10 cm3];95% CI,1.001-1.062;P = 0.0277)和[18F]FDG PET 的 TLU(平均 TLU,1,931 ± 4,248 cm3;HR,1.004 [每 10 cm3];95% CI,1.001-1.007;P = 0.0135)。结论FDG+/FAPI-不一致病灶的存在与明显较短的PFS相关,这可能预示着侵袭性更强的疾病容易出现早期进展。对侵袭性较强的 NEN 患者进行双示踪 PET/CT 检查有助于指导治疗决策或识别高风险病灶,以便采取其他局部治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Meningioma Revisited: Should Whole-Body Staging with [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT of High-Grade Meningiomas Become Standard Practice? SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP) PET. Solving Challenging Puzzles: Heather Jacene Talks with Johannes Czernin About Leadership in Clinical Nuclear Medicine and the SNMMI. [11C]PS13 Demonstrates Pharmacologically Selective and Substantial Binding to Cyclooxygenase-1 in the Human Brain. Imaging of the Aging Human Brain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1