Can Qualitative Cervical Tractography Predict Clinical Findings as Effectively as It Aids Surgical Planning Today?

Zeynep Firat, Osman Melih Topcuoglu, Cumhur Kaan Yaltirik, Aysegul Gormez, Gazanfer Ekinci, Ugur Ture
{"title":"Can Qualitative Cervical Tractography Predict Clinical Findings as Effectively as It Aids Surgical Planning Today?","authors":"Zeynep Firat, Osman Melih Topcuoglu, Cumhur Kaan Yaltirik, Aysegul Gormez, Gazanfer Ekinci, Ugur Ture","doi":"10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.46234-24.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate cervical spinal tractography (CST) and diffusion tensor imaging findings in patients with intramedullary cervical spinal cord (CSC) tumors and to evaluate the association between qualitative diffusion tensor tractography (DTT) findings and neurological examination findings (NEF).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Neuroradiology case records were retrospectively evaluated to identify patients with intramedullary CSC tumors who underwent cervical spinal DTT. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and DTT were performed using a 3.0-T MRI system. Demographic data, CST and clinical findings, fractional anisotropy (FA), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were recorded. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study enrolled 31 patients (16 women and 15 men) with a mean age of 35.2 ± 15.6 years (range: 1-70 years). The mean FA and ADC were 0.34 ± 0.45 and 1.88 ± 0.89, respectively. Physical examination revealed hemihypesthesia (19.3%), hemiparesis (16.1%), and quadriparesis (3.2%). Completely normal neurological findings were observed in 61.3% of the patients. DTT revealed deviation (n=15), deformation (n=11), and interruption (n=5) of the fibers. No significant relationship was observed between NEF and DTT findings (p=0.127). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of DTT for CSC tracts were 100%, 0%, 38.7%, and 0%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although qualitative DTT of the CSC might be useful for planning and preservation of the fiber tracts during intramedullary tumor surgery, it did not exhibit significant association with clinical findings in this study. Qualitative DTT of CSC in patients with intramedullary tumors may not correlate well with NEF.</p>","PeriodicalId":94381,"journal":{"name":"Turkish neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.46234-24.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To investigate cervical spinal tractography (CST) and diffusion tensor imaging findings in patients with intramedullary cervical spinal cord (CSC) tumors and to evaluate the association between qualitative diffusion tensor tractography (DTT) findings and neurological examination findings (NEF).

Material and methods: Neuroradiology case records were retrospectively evaluated to identify patients with intramedullary CSC tumors who underwent cervical spinal DTT. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and DTT were performed using a 3.0-T MRI system. Demographic data, CST and clinical findings, fractional anisotropy (FA), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were recorded. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively) were calculated.

Results: This study enrolled 31 patients (16 women and 15 men) with a mean age of 35.2 ± 15.6 years (range: 1-70 years). The mean FA and ADC were 0.34 ± 0.45 and 1.88 ± 0.89, respectively. Physical examination revealed hemihypesthesia (19.3%), hemiparesis (16.1%), and quadriparesis (3.2%). Completely normal neurological findings were observed in 61.3% of the patients. DTT revealed deviation (n=15), deformation (n=11), and interruption (n=5) of the fibers. No significant relationship was observed between NEF and DTT findings (p=0.127). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of DTT for CSC tracts were 100%, 0%, 38.7%, and 0%, respectively.

Conclusion: Although qualitative DTT of the CSC might be useful for planning and preservation of the fiber tracts during intramedullary tumor surgery, it did not exhibit significant association with clinical findings in this study. Qualitative DTT of CSC in patients with intramedullary tumors may not correlate well with NEF.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
定性宫颈管造影术能否像今天的手术规划一样有效地预测临床结果?
目的:本研究旨在调查髓内颈脊髓(CSC)肿瘤患者的颈脊髓束成像(CST)和弥散张量成像结果,并评估弥散张量束成像(DTT)定性结果与神经系统检查结果(NEF)之间的关联:对神经放射科病例记录进行回顾性评估,以确定接受颈椎弥散张量束成像检查的髓内CSC肿瘤患者。常规磁共振成像(MRI)和 DTT 均使用 3.0-T 磁共振成像系统进行。记录了患者的人口统计学数据、CST和临床表现、分数各向异性(FA)和表观弥散系数(ADC)。计算了敏感性、特异性以及阳性和阴性预测值(分别为 PPV 和 NPV):本研究共纳入 31 名患者(16 名女性和 15 名男性),平均年龄为(35.2 ± 15.6)岁(范围:1-70 岁)。平均 FA 值和 ADC 值分别为 0.34 ± 0.45 和 1.88 ± 0.89。体格检查显示偏瘫(16.1%)、半麻痹(19.3%)和四肢瘫痪(3.2%)。61.3%的患者神经系统检查结果完全正常。DTT 显示纤维偏离(15 例)、变形(11 例)和中断(5 例)。NEF 和 DTT 结果之间无明显关系(P = 0.127)。DTT对CSC束的敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV分别为100%、0%、38.7%和0%:尽管CSC定性DTT可能有助于髓内肿瘤手术中纤维束的规划和保留,但在本研究中,它与临床结果并无明显关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Parapharyngeal Prestyloid Vagal Paraganglioma. Is Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation Efficacious in Treating Axial Symptoms in Patients with a Suboptimal Levodopa Response? Retraction Request Letter. Using Proximal Hooks as a Soft-Landing Strategy to Prevent Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in the Surgical Treatment of Scheuermann's Kyphosis. The Impact of the Placement of the L5 Vertebra in Relation to the Intercrest Line on the Level of Disc Herniation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1