Impact of maternal muscle strength on cesarean delivery outcomes: a comparative study of nulliparous women.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2024-07-02 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.55730/1300-0144.5867
Gülsemin Ertürk Çelik, Sezin Ertürk Aksakal, Yaprak Engin Üstün
{"title":"Impact of maternal muscle strength on cesarean delivery outcomes: a comparative study of nulliparous women.","authors":"Gülsemin Ertürk Çelik, Sezin Ertürk Aksakal, Yaprak Engin Üstün","doi":"10.55730/1300-0144.5867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>This study explored the correlation between maternal muscle mass and strength and the mode of delivery in childbirth. Specifically, it focused on full-term nulliparous pregnant women, analyzing ultrasonographic measurements of the quadriceps femoris muscle together with serum myostatin levels and muscle strength as determined by a handgrip test. The aim was to discern whether these factors could influence the likelihood of delivering vaginally or via cesarean section.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study included 86 healthy nulliparous women at term, categorizing them into two groups based on their mode of delivery: vaginal delivery (58 women, Group 1) and cesarean section (28 women, Group 2). Comparative analyses of demographic information, delivery characteristics, ultrasonographic measurements of the quadriceps femoris, limb circumferences, handgrip strength, and serum myostatin concentrations were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings revealed that women in Group 1 had less gestational weight gain but greater handgrip strength compared to Group 2. Additionally, women who underwent cesarean section due to nonprogressive labor had greater arm and calf circumferences relative to those who had vaginal deliveries.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The data of this study suggest a trend whereby lower maternal muscle strength and mass are associated with a decreased likelihood of vaginal delivery in pregnant women.</p>","PeriodicalId":23361,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"54 5","pages":"908-914"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11518347/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5867","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: This study explored the correlation between maternal muscle mass and strength and the mode of delivery in childbirth. Specifically, it focused on full-term nulliparous pregnant women, analyzing ultrasonographic measurements of the quadriceps femoris muscle together with serum myostatin levels and muscle strength as determined by a handgrip test. The aim was to discern whether these factors could influence the likelihood of delivering vaginally or via cesarean section.

Materials and methods: This study included 86 healthy nulliparous women at term, categorizing them into two groups based on their mode of delivery: vaginal delivery (58 women, Group 1) and cesarean section (28 women, Group 2). Comparative analyses of demographic information, delivery characteristics, ultrasonographic measurements of the quadriceps femoris, limb circumferences, handgrip strength, and serum myostatin concentrations were conducted.

Results: The findings revealed that women in Group 1 had less gestational weight gain but greater handgrip strength compared to Group 2. Additionally, women who underwent cesarean section due to nonprogressive labor had greater arm and calf circumferences relative to those who had vaginal deliveries.

Conclusion: The data of this study suggest a trend whereby lower maternal muscle strength and mass are associated with a decreased likelihood of vaginal delivery in pregnant women.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产妇肌肉力量对剖宫产结果的影响:一项针对无阴道产妇的比较研究。
背景/目的:本研究探讨了产妇肌肉质量和力量与分娩方式之间的相关性。具体而言,该研究以足月无阴道分娩的孕妇为对象,分析了股四头肌的超声波测量值、血清肌生成素水平以及通过手握试验测定的肌肉力量。研究的目的是了解这些因素是否会影响经阴道分娩或剖腹产的可能性:这项研究包括 86 名健康的足月无痛分娩产妇,根据其分娩方式分为两组:阴道分娩(58 名产妇,第 1 组)和剖宫产(28 名产妇,第 2 组)。对人口统计学信息、分娩特征、股四头肌超声波测量、肢体围度、握力和血清肌生长激素浓度进行了比较分析:结果:研究结果显示,与第二组相比,第一组产妇的妊娠体重增加较少,但手握强度较大。此外,与阴道分娩的产妇相比,因顺产而接受剖宫产的产妇的手臂和小腿周长更大:本研究的数据表明,产妇肌肉力量和质量较低与孕妇阴道分娩的可能性降低有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Turkish Journal of Medical sciences is a peer-reviewed comprehensive resource that provides critical up-to-date information on the broad spectrum of general medical sciences. The Journal intended to publish original medical scientific papers regarding the priority based on the prominence, significance, and timeliness of the findings. However since the audience of the Journal is not limited to any subspeciality in a wide variety of medical disciplines, the papers focusing on the technical  details of a given medical  subspeciality may not be evaluated for publication.
期刊最新文献
Hematological diseases and the heart. Transition of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus from pediatric to adult-oriented rheumatology care. Evaluation of single-layer versus double-layer suturing of low transverse uterine incisions in cesarean section and follow-up of scars by ultrasound: a prospective randomized controlled study. The difference between clinical significance and statistical significance: an important distinction for clinical research. Cardiac effects and comorbidities of neurological diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1