Trade dynamics of environmental goods within global energy economy and their impacts on green technological innovation: A complex network analysis

IF 13.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Energy Economics Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107957
Yuyuan Yu , Muhammad Qayyum , Shijie Li
{"title":"Trade dynamics of environmental goods within global energy economy and their impacts on green technological innovation: A complex network analysis","authors":"Yuyuan Yu ,&nbsp;Muhammad Qayyum ,&nbsp;Shijie Li","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Trade in environmental goods, primarily renewable energy plants and wastewater management equipment, facilitates the dissemination of technologies essential for ecological preservation. Traditional indicators like trade intensity fail to capture the network advantage that a country may possess in advancing environmental-related technologies. Therefore, this study develops a directed trade network of environmental goods (EGTN) from 2002 to 2021 across 234 countries or regions. By applying network topology, we investigate the structural features and dynamic changes of the EGTN. Our analysis reveals that the EGTN has become increasingly interconnected, predominantly influenced by certain OECD countries (i.e., France, Germany and the US) and developing countries (i.e., South Africa, China, and India). Utilizing panel data from 27 OECD countries and 5 BRICS countries between 2002 and 2019, our baseline quantile regressions show that enhanced trade central status can significantly promote green innovation across all percentiles. Non-linear and U-shaped relationships are detected for betweenness centrality and closeness centrality variables. In contrast, the effects of eigenvector centrality diminish in more innovative countries. The above findings remain robust after accounting for potential endogeneity problems. Moreover, while stricter environmental policies tend to promote the development of green innovations in OECD countries, non-market-based policies in BRICS may pose challenges to advancing such innovations. Policies that facilitate information dissemination and strengthen partnerships with influential trade partners can help local organizations leverage their network advantages to spur innovation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"140 ","pages":"Article 107957"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324006650","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trade in environmental goods, primarily renewable energy plants and wastewater management equipment, facilitates the dissemination of technologies essential for ecological preservation. Traditional indicators like trade intensity fail to capture the network advantage that a country may possess in advancing environmental-related technologies. Therefore, this study develops a directed trade network of environmental goods (EGTN) from 2002 to 2021 across 234 countries or regions. By applying network topology, we investigate the structural features and dynamic changes of the EGTN. Our analysis reveals that the EGTN has become increasingly interconnected, predominantly influenced by certain OECD countries (i.e., France, Germany and the US) and developing countries (i.e., South Africa, China, and India). Utilizing panel data from 27 OECD countries and 5 BRICS countries between 2002 and 2019, our baseline quantile regressions show that enhanced trade central status can significantly promote green innovation across all percentiles. Non-linear and U-shaped relationships are detected for betweenness centrality and closeness centrality variables. In contrast, the effects of eigenvector centrality diminish in more innovative countries. The above findings remain robust after accounting for potential endogeneity problems. Moreover, while stricter environmental policies tend to promote the development of green innovations in OECD countries, non-market-based policies in BRICS may pose challenges to advancing such innovations. Policies that facilitate information dissemination and strengthen partnerships with influential trade partners can help local organizations leverage their network advantages to spur innovation.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球能源经济中环境产品的贸易动态及其对绿色技术创新的影响:复杂网络分析
环境产品(主要是可再生能源工厂和废水管理设备)的贸易促进了生态保护所必需的技术的传播。贸易强度等传统指标无法反映一个国家在推进环境相关技术方面可能拥有的网络优势。因此,本研究建立了一个 2002 年至 2021 年横跨 234 个国家或地区的环境产品定向贸易网络(EGTN)。通过应用网络拓扑结构,我们研究了环境产品贸易网络的结构特征和动态变化。我们的分析表明,EGTN 的相互联系日益紧密,主要受到某些经合组织国家(如法国、德国和美国)和发展中国家(如南非、中国和印度)的影响。利用 2002 年至 2019 年期间 27 个经合组织国家和 5 个金砖国家的面板数据,我们的基线量子回归结果表明,贸易中心地位的增强可显著促进所有百分位数的绿色创新。在 "间度中心性 "和 "接近中心性 "变量中发现了非线性和 U 型关系。相比之下,特征向量中心性的影响在创新程度较高的国家有所减弱。在考虑了潜在的内生性问题后,上述结论依然稳健。此外,在经合组织国家,更严格的环境政策倾向于促进绿色创新的发展,而在金砖国家,非市场型政策可能对推进此类创新构成挑战。促进信息传播和加强与有影响力的贸易伙伴的伙伴关系的政策可以帮助当地组织利用其网络优势来刺激创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
期刊最新文献
Zooming in or zooming out: Energy strategy, developmental parity and regional entrepreneurial dynamism How financial derivatives affect energy firms' ESG The performance of renewable-rich wholesale electricity markets with significant energy storage and flexibility Retraction notice to “Geopolitical oil price uncertainty transmission into core inflation: Evidence from two of the biggest global players” Energy Economics Volume 126, October 2023, 106,983. Novel and old news sentiment in commodity futures markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1