Modality and fidelity: Understanding how creative stimulus combinations impact design outcomes and process across different conceptual design phases

IF 3.7 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Thinking Skills and Creativity Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101657
Pei Chen , Zhuoshu Li , Yexinrui Wu , Hongbo Zhang , Jiaxuan Zhou , Lingyun Sun
{"title":"Modality and fidelity: Understanding how creative stimulus combinations impact design outcomes and process across different conceptual design phases","authors":"Pei Chen ,&nbsp;Zhuoshu Li ,&nbsp;Yexinrui Wu ,&nbsp;Hongbo Zhang ,&nbsp;Jiaxuan Zhou ,&nbsp;Lingyun Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>During conceptual design, creative stimuli are an external source of inspiration to support students’ ideation process. Although existing research has explored the roles of creative stimuli, they rarely consider the intertwined influence brought by stimuli’s multiple characteristics, and overlook variations in stimuli’s effectiveness at different design phases. To fill this gap, this research conducted a <span><math><mrow><mn>3</mn><mo>×</mo><mn>3</mn></mrow></math></span> experiment, involving 72 design students in a three-phase design process and presenting combinations of textual and visual stimuli at distinct fidelities. We assessed different stimulus combinations’ influence on creativity, and employed behavior coding and linkograph to reveal students’ behavior and cognitive patterns throughout the process. The results revealed the mutual influence between the fidelity of texts and images, and students commonly needed more concrete stimuli in later design phases. Furthermore, students provided with different stimulus combinations exhibited variations in time allocation for behaviors including task analysis, idea generation, and evaluation, and they employed distinct approaches to generate new ideas. These findings highlight the necessity for design educators to dynamically provide creative stimuli based on the design phase, educational objective, and students’ state.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 101657"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187124001950","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During conceptual design, creative stimuli are an external source of inspiration to support students’ ideation process. Although existing research has explored the roles of creative stimuli, they rarely consider the intertwined influence brought by stimuli’s multiple characteristics, and overlook variations in stimuli’s effectiveness at different design phases. To fill this gap, this research conducted a 3×3 experiment, involving 72 design students in a three-phase design process and presenting combinations of textual and visual stimuli at distinct fidelities. We assessed different stimulus combinations’ influence on creativity, and employed behavior coding and linkograph to reveal students’ behavior and cognitive patterns throughout the process. The results revealed the mutual influence between the fidelity of texts and images, and students commonly needed more concrete stimuli in later design phases. Furthermore, students provided with different stimulus combinations exhibited variations in time allocation for behaviors including task analysis, idea generation, and evaluation, and they employed distinct approaches to generate new ideas. These findings highlight the necessity for design educators to dynamically provide creative stimuli based on the design phase, educational objective, and students’ state.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模式和保真度:了解创意刺激组合如何影响不同概念设计阶段的设计成果和过程
在概念设计过程中,创意刺激是支持学生构思过程的外部灵感来源。现有研究虽然探讨了创意刺激的作用,但很少考虑刺激的多种特性所带来的交织影响,也忽视了刺激在不同设计阶段的效果差异。为了填补这一空白,本研究进行了一次 3×3 实验,让 72 名设计专业的学生参与三个阶段的设计过程,并以不同的保真度呈现文字和视觉刺激组合。我们评估了不同刺激组合对创造力的影响,并采用行为编码和链接图揭示了学生在整个过程中的行为和认知模式。结果显示,文字和图像的保真度之间存在相互影响,学生在后期设计阶段通常需要更具体的刺激。此外,不同刺激组合的学生在任务分析、创意生成和评估等行为的时间分配上表现出差异,他们采用了不同的方法来生成新的创意。这些发现凸显了设计教育者根据设计阶段、教育目标和学生状态动态提供创意刺激的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
期刊最新文献
Validation and network structure of the Kaufman domains of creativity scale: A psychometric investigation in an Arabic context Creativity and motor skill learning among kindergarten children: Investigating Predictive correlations and performance differences The influence of group categorization and common ingroup identity on malevolent creativity, benevolent creativity, and neutral creativity The long-term impact of executive functions on everyday creativity among Chinese adolescents: A longitudinal mediation model of emotional resilience and creative self-efficacy Measuring parental behaviors supporting higher order thinking skills in children: A scale development study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1