Hadas Zafrir-Danieli , Ohad Houri , Reut Rotem , Dror Weinberg-Almog , Or Bercovich , Eran Hadar , Alexandra Berezowsky
{"title":"Gestational diabetes mellitus – Can we do better with postpartum diabetes screening?","authors":"Hadas Zafrir-Danieli , Ohad Houri , Reut Rotem , Dror Weinberg-Almog , Or Bercovich , Eran Hadar , Alexandra Berezowsky","doi":"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.10.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to assess the accuracy of measuring fasting plasma glucose (FPG) within 24–48 h postpartum in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) as a predictor for abnormal 6–12-week postpartum oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT).</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study (2012–2021) included women with GDM and singleton pregnancies who had FPG levels recorded 24–28 h postpartum and underwent a 6–12-week OGTT. The study compared the predictive accuracy of these FPG readings with the OGTT results.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 3128 GDM patients, 1163 (37.2 %) had a postpartum OGTT, with 935 (80.2 %) showing normal FPG (<100 mg/dL). In low-risk GDM cases (managed by lifestyle modifications), 86.15 % had normal postpartum FPG. Normal 24–48 h FPG readings, especially in low-risk GDM cases, had a high negative predictive value (NPV of 99.3 %) for type-2 diabetes at the 6–12-week OGTT, but a lower NPV (85.8 %) for predicting future glucose intolerance.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Immediate postpartum FPG testing effectively excludes low-risk GDM women with regards to future type-2 diabetes and reasonably excluded future glucose intolerance in this group. Due to low compliance with standard OGTT, postpartum FPG could be a more practical predictive tool for diabetes in low-risk GDM cases.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11975,"journal":{"name":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","volume":"303 ","pages":"Pages 153-158"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030121152400544X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
This study aimed to assess the accuracy of measuring fasting plasma glucose (FPG) within 24–48 h postpartum in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) as a predictor for abnormal 6–12-week postpartum oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT).
Study design
A retrospective cohort study (2012–2021) included women with GDM and singleton pregnancies who had FPG levels recorded 24–28 h postpartum and underwent a 6–12-week OGTT. The study compared the predictive accuracy of these FPG readings with the OGTT results.
Results
Among 3128 GDM patients, 1163 (37.2 %) had a postpartum OGTT, with 935 (80.2 %) showing normal FPG (<100 mg/dL). In low-risk GDM cases (managed by lifestyle modifications), 86.15 % had normal postpartum FPG. Normal 24–48 h FPG readings, especially in low-risk GDM cases, had a high negative predictive value (NPV of 99.3 %) for type-2 diabetes at the 6–12-week OGTT, but a lower NPV (85.8 %) for predicting future glucose intolerance.
Discussion
Immediate postpartum FPG testing effectively excludes low-risk GDM women with regards to future type-2 diabetes and reasonably excluded future glucose intolerance in this group. Due to low compliance with standard OGTT, postpartum FPG could be a more practical predictive tool for diabetes in low-risk GDM cases.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology is the leading general clinical journal covering the continent. It publishes peer reviewed original research articles, as well as a wide range of news, book reviews, biographical, historical and educational articles and a lively correspondence section. Fields covered include obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine and reproductive ethics. The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology provides a forum for scientific and clinical professional communication in obstetrics and gynecology throughout Europe and the world.