Spatio-temporal distribution, prediction and relationship of three major acute cardiovascular events: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, ST-elevation myocardial infarction and stroke

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Resuscitation plus Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100810
Angelo Auricchio , Tommaso Scquizzato , Federico Ravenda , Ruggero Cresta , Stefano Peluso , Maria Luce Caputo , Stefano Tonazzi , Claudio Benvenuti , Antonietta Mira
{"title":"Spatio-temporal distribution, prediction and relationship of three major acute cardiovascular events: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, ST-elevation myocardial infarction and stroke","authors":"Angelo Auricchio ,&nbsp;Tommaso Scquizzato ,&nbsp;Federico Ravenda ,&nbsp;Ruggero Cresta ,&nbsp;Stefano Peluso ,&nbsp;Maria Luce Caputo ,&nbsp;Stefano Tonazzi ,&nbsp;Claudio Benvenuti ,&nbsp;Antonietta Mira","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Predicting the incidence of time-sensitive cardiovascular diseases like out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and stroke can reduce time to treatment and improve outcomes. This study analysed the spatio-temporal distribution of OHCAs, STEMIs, and strokes, their spatio-temporal correlation, and the performance of different prediction algorithms.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Adults who experienced an OHCA, STEMI, or stroke in Canton Ticino, Switzerland from 2005 to 2022 were included. Datasets were divided into training and validation samples. To estimate and predict the yearly per-capita population incidences of OHCA, STEMI, and stroke, the integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA), machine learning meta model (MLMM), the Naïve prediction method, and the exponential moving average were employed and compared. The relationship between OHCA, STEMI, and stroke was assessed by predicting the incidence of one condition, considering the lagged incidence of the other two as explanatory variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 3,906 OHCAs, 2,162 STEMIs, and 2,536 stroke patients. INLA and MLMM yearly predicted incidence OHCA, STEMI, and stroke at municipality level with very high accuracy, outperforming the Naïve forecasting and the exponential moving average. INLA exhibited errors of zero or one event in 82%, 87%, and 72% of municipalities for OHCA, STEMI, and stroke, respectively, whereas ML had errors in 81%, 89%, and 71% of municipalities for the same conditions. INLA had a prediction error of 0.87, 0.77, and 1.50 events per year per municipality for OHCA, STEMI and stroke, whereas MLMM of 0.70, 0.74, and 1.09 events, respectively. Including in the INLA model the lagged absolute values of the other conditions as covariates improved the prediction of OHCA and stroke but not STEMI. MLMM predictions were consistently the most accurate and did not benefit from the inclusion of the other conditions as covariates. All the three diseases showed a similar spatial pattern.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Prediction of incidence of OHCA, STEMI, and stroke is possible with very high accuracy using INLA and MLMM models. A robust spatio-temporal correlation between the 3 pathologies exists. Widespread implementation in clinical practice of prediction algorithms may allow to improve resource allocation, reduce treatment delays, and improve outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100810"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424002613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Predicting the incidence of time-sensitive cardiovascular diseases like out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and stroke can reduce time to treatment and improve outcomes. This study analysed the spatio-temporal distribution of OHCAs, STEMIs, and strokes, their spatio-temporal correlation, and the performance of different prediction algorithms.

Methods

Adults who experienced an OHCA, STEMI, or stroke in Canton Ticino, Switzerland from 2005 to 2022 were included. Datasets were divided into training and validation samples. To estimate and predict the yearly per-capita population incidences of OHCA, STEMI, and stroke, the integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA), machine learning meta model (MLMM), the Naïve prediction method, and the exponential moving average were employed and compared. The relationship between OHCA, STEMI, and stroke was assessed by predicting the incidence of one condition, considering the lagged incidence of the other two as explanatory variables.

Results

We included 3,906 OHCAs, 2,162 STEMIs, and 2,536 stroke patients. INLA and MLMM yearly predicted incidence OHCA, STEMI, and stroke at municipality level with very high accuracy, outperforming the Naïve forecasting and the exponential moving average. INLA exhibited errors of zero or one event in 82%, 87%, and 72% of municipalities for OHCA, STEMI, and stroke, respectively, whereas ML had errors in 81%, 89%, and 71% of municipalities for the same conditions. INLA had a prediction error of 0.87, 0.77, and 1.50 events per year per municipality for OHCA, STEMI and stroke, whereas MLMM of 0.70, 0.74, and 1.09 events, respectively. Including in the INLA model the lagged absolute values of the other conditions as covariates improved the prediction of OHCA and stroke but not STEMI. MLMM predictions were consistently the most accurate and did not benefit from the inclusion of the other conditions as covariates. All the three diseases showed a similar spatial pattern.

Conclusions

Prediction of incidence of OHCA, STEMI, and stroke is possible with very high accuracy using INLA and MLMM models. A robust spatio-temporal correlation between the 3 pathologies exists. Widespread implementation in clinical practice of prediction algorithms may allow to improve resource allocation, reduce treatment delays, and improve outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三种主要急性心血管事件的时空分布、预测和关系:院外心脏骤停、ST 段抬高心肌梗死和中风
背景预测院外心脏骤停(OHCA)、ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)和脑卒中等时间敏感性心血管疾病的发病率可缩短治疗时间并改善预后。本研究分析了院外心脏骤停、STEMI 和中风的时空分布、它们的时空相关性以及不同预测算法的性能。数据集分为训练样本和验证样本。为了估算和预测每年OHCA、STEMI和中风的人均发病率,我们采用了集成嵌套拉普拉斯近似法(INLA)、机器学习元模型(MLMM)、奈夫预测法和指数移动平均法,并进行了比较。结果我们纳入了 3906 例 OHCA、2162 例 STEMI 和 2536 例中风患者。INLA 和 MLMM 以极高的准确率预测了市级的 OHCA、STEMI 和中风发病率,优于 Naïve 预测和指数移动平均法。在 OHCA、STEMI 和中风方面,INLA 分别在 82%、87% 和 72% 的城市中显示出误差为零或一个事件,而 ML 在相同情况下分别在 81%、89% 和 71% 的城市中显示出误差。INLA 对 OHCA、STEMI 和中风的预测误差分别为每个城市每年 0.87、0.77 和 1.50 例,而 MLMM 分别为 0.70、0.74 和 1.09 例。在 INLA 模型中加入其他病症的滞后绝对值作为协变量,可以改善对 OHCA 和中风的预测,但不能改善对 STEMI 的预测。MLMM 预测一直是最准确的,并没有从将其他病症作为协变量中获益。结论使用 INLA 和 MLMM 模型可以非常准确地预测 OHCA、STEMI 和中风的发病率。这三种病症之间存在着稳健的时空相关性。在临床实践中广泛应用预测算法可以改善资源分配、减少治疗延迟并改善预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
期刊最新文献
Prehospital ventilation strategies in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A protocol for a randomized controlled trial (PIVOT trial) Effect of introduction of a rapid response system and increasing Medical Emergency Team (MET) activity on mortality over a 20-year period in a paediatric specialist hospital Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in obese patients: A scoping review Effect of chest compressions in addition to extracorporeal life support on carotid flow in an experimental model of refractory cardiac arrest in pigs Ventilation practices and preparedness of healthcare providers in term newborn resuscitation: A comprehensive survey study in Austrian hospitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1