AI chatbots: A disguised enemy for academic integrity?

Ahnaf Chowdhury Niloy , Reaz Hafiz , Bhuiyan Md.Tasnim Hossain , Farhana Gulmeher , Naznin Sultana , Khondokar Fardin Islam , Fabiha Bushra , Samiya Islam , Syed Irfanul Hoque , Md.Azizur Rahman , Sayma Kabir
{"title":"AI chatbots: A disguised enemy for academic integrity?","authors":"Ahnaf Chowdhury Niloy ,&nbsp;Reaz Hafiz ,&nbsp;Bhuiyan Md.Tasnim Hossain ,&nbsp;Farhana Gulmeher ,&nbsp;Naznin Sultana ,&nbsp;Khondokar Fardin Islam ,&nbsp;Fabiha Bushra ,&nbsp;Samiya Islam ,&nbsp;Syed Irfanul Hoque ,&nbsp;Md.Azizur Rahman ,&nbsp;Sayma Kabir","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The widespread popularity of ChatGPT and other AI chatbots has sparked debate within the scientific community, particularly regarding their impact on academic integrity among students. While several studies have examined AI's role in education, a significant gap remains concerning how AI chatbot usage affects students’ perceptions of academic integrity. This study aims to address this gap through rigorous quantitative techniques to explore the dynamics of student interactions with AI chatbots and assess whether this engagement diminishes academic integrity in higher education. Using a non-experimental design, the research investigates the causal relationship between AI chatbot usage and academic integrity, focusing on eight latent variables identified in the literature. A stratified sampling technique was employed to collect a representative sample of 594 participants via a 5-point Likert scale survey from four Southern Asian countries. The dataset underwent extensive statistical analysis using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) techniques. The findings establish significant links between motivations for using AI chatbots and a decline in academic integrity. The study identifies a behavioral link between academic integrity and pedagogical limitations, highlighting traditional classroom-based pedagogy as the most impactful factor influencing students’ motivation to engage with AI chatbots. This research not only quantitatively addresses ethical concerns related to AI in academia but also offers insights into user behavior by assigning distinct weights to post-usage behavioral factors, differentiating it from earlier studies that treated these factors equally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73445,"journal":{"name":"International journal of educational research open","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100396"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of educational research open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374024000785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The widespread popularity of ChatGPT and other AI chatbots has sparked debate within the scientific community, particularly regarding their impact on academic integrity among students. While several studies have examined AI's role in education, a significant gap remains concerning how AI chatbot usage affects students’ perceptions of academic integrity. This study aims to address this gap through rigorous quantitative techniques to explore the dynamics of student interactions with AI chatbots and assess whether this engagement diminishes academic integrity in higher education. Using a non-experimental design, the research investigates the causal relationship between AI chatbot usage and academic integrity, focusing on eight latent variables identified in the literature. A stratified sampling technique was employed to collect a representative sample of 594 participants via a 5-point Likert scale survey from four Southern Asian countries. The dataset underwent extensive statistical analysis using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) techniques. The findings establish significant links between motivations for using AI chatbots and a decline in academic integrity. The study identifies a behavioral link between academic integrity and pedagogical limitations, highlighting traditional classroom-based pedagogy as the most impactful factor influencing students’ motivation to engage with AI chatbots. This research not only quantitatively addresses ethical concerns related to AI in academia but also offers insights into user behavior by assigning distinct weights to post-usage behavioral factors, differentiating it from earlier studies that treated these factors equally.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能聊天机器人:学术诚信的变相敌人?
ChatGPT 和其他人工智能聊天机器人的广泛流行引发了科学界的争论,尤其是它们对学生学术诚信的影响。虽然已有多项研究探讨了人工智能在教育中的作用,但在人工智能聊天机器人的使用如何影响学生对学术诚信的看法方面仍存在巨大差距。本研究旨在通过严格的定量技术探索学生与人工智能聊天机器人互动的动态,并评估这种互动是否会削弱高等教育中的学术诚信,从而弥补这一空白。本研究采用非实验设计,调查人工智能聊天机器人的使用与学术诚信之间的因果关系,重点关注文献中确定的八个潜在变量。研究采用了分层抽样技术,通过 5 点李克特量表调查从四个南亚国家收集了 594 个代表性样本。数据集采用结构方程模型(SEM)技术进行了广泛的统计分析。研究结果表明,使用人工智能聊天机器人的动机与学术诚信下降之间存在重要联系。研究确定了学术诚信与教学限制之间的行为联系,强调传统的课堂教学法是影响学生使用人工智能聊天机器人动机的最有影响力的因素。这项研究不仅从数量上解决了与学术界人工智能相关的伦理问题,还通过为使用后的行为因素分配不同的权重,提供了对用户行为的见解,有别于早期对这些因素同等对待的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Navigating the virtual landscape: A systematic review of approaches to cultivating a sense of community among distance learners in health and allied health disciplines Approaching a substantive theory of moral reckoning in special education leadership: Innovative grounded theory methods using extant data on principals An assessment of the Education Management Information System in Sierra Leone and potential for enhanced disability inclusiveness AI chatbots: A disguised enemy for academic integrity? The role of students’ perceived teacher support in student motivation: A longitudinal study of student motivation profiles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1