Does health anxiety and vaccine concern predict self-reported adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination?–A Danish national cohort study

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Public Health Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2024.10.007
Kristoffer Torp Hansen , Fiona Kusk Povlsen , Bodil Hammer Bech , Stefan Nygaard Hansen , Charlotte Ulrikka Rask , Per Fink , Henrik Nielsen , Thomas Meinertz Dantoft , Sanne Marie Thysen , Dorte Rytter
{"title":"Does health anxiety and vaccine concern predict self-reported adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination?–A Danish national cohort study","authors":"Kristoffer Torp Hansen ,&nbsp;Fiona Kusk Povlsen ,&nbsp;Bodil Hammer Bech ,&nbsp;Stefan Nygaard Hansen ,&nbsp;Charlotte Ulrikka Rask ,&nbsp;Per Fink ,&nbsp;Henrik Nielsen ,&nbsp;Thomas Meinertz Dantoft ,&nbsp;Sanne Marie Thysen ,&nbsp;Dorte Rytter","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2024.10.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The nocebo effect refers to an expectation of sickness that leads to sickness in the expectant. Studies have found COVID-19 vaccines to be associated with the nocebo effect. However, the literature in this field is sparse yet important with the continuation of booster vaccines.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>National cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study used data from the Danish national cohort “BiCoVac”, which contains self-reported information on both health anxiety and specific COVID-19 vaccine concern, as well as 19 systemic AEs following COVID-19 vaccination. Simple and multiple logistic regression was used to estimate the association between health anxiety and specific COVID-19 vaccine concern with having one or more systemic AEs following COVID-19 vaccination. Inverse probability weights were used to compensate for the initial dropout and loss to follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 85,080 participants in the study, 4 % reported health anxiety, 30 % reported specific COVID-19 vaccine concern, and 26 % one or more systemic AEs following vaccination. After adjusting for covariates, participants with health anxiety had higher odds of reporting one or more systemic AEs following vaccination compared to those without (OR, 1·21 CI 95 % [1·10; 1·33]). For specific COVID-19 vaccine concern, the OR was 1·51 CI 95 % [1·45; 1·58].</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Participants with specific COVID-19 vaccine concern had higher odds of reporting one or more systemic AEs following vaccination compared with those who had no specific COVID-19 vaccine concern. There might be a potential to reduce AEs, with positive framing of AEs and information about nocebo. Reporting of AEs was also associated with health anxiety, but to a lesser degree.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"237 ","pages":"Pages 299-306"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350624004189","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The nocebo effect refers to an expectation of sickness that leads to sickness in the expectant. Studies have found COVID-19 vaccines to be associated with the nocebo effect. However, the literature in this field is sparse yet important with the continuation of booster vaccines.

Study design

National cohort study.

Methods

This study used data from the Danish national cohort “BiCoVac”, which contains self-reported information on both health anxiety and specific COVID-19 vaccine concern, as well as 19 systemic AEs following COVID-19 vaccination. Simple and multiple logistic regression was used to estimate the association between health anxiety and specific COVID-19 vaccine concern with having one or more systemic AEs following COVID-19 vaccination. Inverse probability weights were used to compensate for the initial dropout and loss to follow-up.

Results

Of the 85,080 participants in the study, 4 % reported health anxiety, 30 % reported specific COVID-19 vaccine concern, and 26 % one or more systemic AEs following vaccination. After adjusting for covariates, participants with health anxiety had higher odds of reporting one or more systemic AEs following vaccination compared to those without (OR, 1·21 CI 95 % [1·10; 1·33]). For specific COVID-19 vaccine concern, the OR was 1·51 CI 95 % [1·45; 1·58].

Conclusions

Participants with specific COVID-19 vaccine concern had higher odds of reporting one or more systemic AEs following vaccination compared with those who had no specific COVID-19 vaccine concern. There might be a potential to reduce AEs, with positive framing of AEs and information about nocebo. Reporting of AEs was also associated with health anxiety, but to a lesser degree.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康焦虑和疫苗担忧能否预测接种 COVID-19 疫苗后自我报告的不良事件?
研究目的:前兆效应是指对疾病的预期会导致预期者生病。研究发现,COVID-19 疫苗与前兆效应有关。本研究使用的数据来自丹麦国家队列 "BiCoVac",其中包含有关健康焦虑和对 COVID-19 疫苗的具体担忧的自我报告信息,以及接种 COVID-19 疫苗后的 19 种系统性 AEs。我们使用简单和多元逻辑回归来估计健康焦虑和对 COVID-19 疫苗的特殊关注与接种 COVID-19 疫苗后出现一种或多种全身性 AEs 之间的关系。结果 在这项研究的 85,080 名参与者中,4% 的人报告了健康焦虑,30% 的人报告了对 COVID-19 疫苗的特殊关注,26% 的人在接种疫苗后出现了一次或多次全身性 AEs。在对协变量进行调整后,与没有健康焦虑的参与者相比,有健康焦虑的参与者在接种疫苗后出现一次或多次全身性不良反应的几率更高(OR,1-21 CI 95 % [1-10;1-33])。结论与对 COVID-19 疫苗没有特殊担忧的人相比,对 COVID-19 疫苗有特殊担忧的人在接种后报告一次或多次全身性 AE 的几率更高。通过对AEs的正面描述和关于 "应急 "的信息,有可能减少AEs。报告不良反应也与健康焦虑有关,但程度较轻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
期刊最新文献
Impact of regional medical self-sufficiency on mortality from cancer, stroke and myocardial infarction Spatiotemporal variations in body mass index among Han adolescents aged 18 years across 27 provinces of China, 1985–2019: Results from eight successive national cross-sectional surveys Cardiovascular disease burden linked to particulate matter pollution in Latin America and the Caribbean: Insights from GBD 2021 and socio-demographic index analysis Assessing the gap: Resource efficiency of institutionalised elderly care in urban and rural China Exploring the diversity of sexual acts in Chinese men who have sex with men and its impacts on the risk of HIV and sexually transmitted infections
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1