Using virtual patient simulation with partial task trainer: A quasi-experimental study

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nurse Education in Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104177
Gul Sahin Karaduman, Tulay Basak, Senem Duman
{"title":"Using virtual patient simulation with partial task trainer: A quasi-experimental study","authors":"Gul Sahin Karaduman,&nbsp;Tulay Basak,&nbsp;Senem Duman","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Nursing students need educational approaches that provide sufficient knowledge and practice opportunities to improve their skills.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To analyze the benefits of incorporating partial task trainers into virtual patients, focusing on the effectiveness, performance, self-confidence, satisfaction and knowledge scores among senior nursing students in urinary catheterization for patients with acute urinary retention.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A randomized, quasi-experimental design.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study was conducted at a nursing faculty between April-May 2023 with 71 senior nursing students: 35 in the virtual patient group (Group I) and 36 in the virtual patient and partial task trainer group (Group II). The data were gathered using: <em>Personal Information Form</em>, <em>Student Satisfaction and Self-confidence in Learning Scale</em>, <em>Simulation Effectiveness Tool</em>, <em>Performance Report and Knowledge Report</em>.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The <em>satisfaction</em> and <em>self-confidence</em> scores for Group I were 4.67 (SD 0.49) and 4.38 (SD 0.48), whereas Group II scored 4.88 (SD 0.22) and 4.70 (SD 0.34), respectively. The differences were statistically significant (p&lt;0.05). For the Simulation Effectiveness Tool, Group I scored 31.05 (SD 3.28) for <em>confidence</em> subdimension and 85.05 (SD 7.37) for the <em>total</em> score, whereas Group II scored 32.57 (SD 2.73 and 88.48 (SD 6.60), respectively. These differences were statistically significant (p&lt;0.05). No significant differences were found between the groups in the prebriefing, learning and debriefing subdimensions of the Simulation Effectiveness Tool (p&gt;0.05). <em>Performance</em> and <em>knowledge</em> scores also showed no significant differences (p&gt;0.05). Effect sizes for all statistically significant differences were moderate.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The results show that using virtual patients with partial task trainers increases students’ <em>satisfaction</em> and <em>self-confidence</em> and is perceived as effective in developing nursing interventions for patients with acute urinary retention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595324003068","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Nursing students need educational approaches that provide sufficient knowledge and practice opportunities to improve their skills.

Aim

To analyze the benefits of incorporating partial task trainers into virtual patients, focusing on the effectiveness, performance, self-confidence, satisfaction and knowledge scores among senior nursing students in urinary catheterization for patients with acute urinary retention.

Design

A randomized, quasi-experimental design.

Methods

The study was conducted at a nursing faculty between April-May 2023 with 71 senior nursing students: 35 in the virtual patient group (Group I) and 36 in the virtual patient and partial task trainer group (Group II). The data were gathered using: Personal Information Form, Student Satisfaction and Self-confidence in Learning Scale, Simulation Effectiveness Tool, Performance Report and Knowledge Report.

Results

The satisfaction and self-confidence scores for Group I were 4.67 (SD 0.49) and 4.38 (SD 0.48), whereas Group II scored 4.88 (SD 0.22) and 4.70 (SD 0.34), respectively. The differences were statistically significant (p<0.05). For the Simulation Effectiveness Tool, Group I scored 31.05 (SD 3.28) for confidence subdimension and 85.05 (SD 7.37) for the total score, whereas Group II scored 32.57 (SD 2.73 and 88.48 (SD 6.60), respectively. These differences were statistically significant (p<0.05). No significant differences were found between the groups in the prebriefing, learning and debriefing subdimensions of the Simulation Effectiveness Tool (p>0.05). Performance and knowledge scores also showed no significant differences (p>0.05). Effect sizes for all statistically significant differences were moderate.

Conclusions

The results show that using virtual patients with partial task trainers increases students’ satisfaction and self-confidence and is perceived as effective in developing nursing interventions for patients with acute urinary retention.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用虚拟病人模拟和部分任务训练器:准实验研究
背景护理专业学生需要能提供足够知识和实践机会的教育方法来提高他们的技能。目的分析将部分任务培训师纳入虚拟患者的益处,重点关注高年级护理专业学生在为急性尿潴留患者导尿时的效果、表现、自信心、满意度和知识得分。方法该研究于 2023 年 4 月至 5 月在护理学院进行,共有 71 名高年级护理专业学生参加:虚拟患者组(I 组)35 人,虚拟患者和部分任务培训师组(II 组)36 人。收集数据的方法如下结果 I 组的满意度和自信心得分分别为 4.67(SD 0.49)和 4.38(SD 0.48),而 II 组的满意度和自信心得分分别为 4.88(SD 0.22)和 4.70(SD 0.34)。差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在模拟效果工具方面,第一组的信心子维度得分为 31.05(标准差 3.28),总分为 85.05(标准差 7.37);第二组的信心子维度得分为 32.57(标准差 2.73),总分为 88.48(标准差 6.60)。这些差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在模拟效果工具的汇报前、学习和汇报子维度上,各组之间没有发现明显差异(p>0.05)。表现和知识得分也无明显差异(p>0.05)。结论结果表明,使用虚拟病人和部分任务培训师可提高学生的满意度和自信心,并被认为是对急性尿潴留病人进行护理干预的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.40%
发文量
180
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education in Practice enables lecturers and practitioners to both share and disseminate evidence that demonstrates the actual practice of education as it is experienced in the realities of their respective work environments. It is supportive of new authors and will be at the forefront in publishing individual and collaborative papers that demonstrate the link between education and practice.
期刊最新文献
‘Listen with an open-heart always’ – A qualitative study exploring transformational learning opportunities for Australian midwifery students participating in a virtual international study experience Nursing students’ perceived ability to practice interprofessional collaboration after the inclusion of virtual and immersion interprofessional education activities: A quantitative exploration Nurses' experiences of working with robotic assisted surgery in an Irish healthcare setting: A qualitative descriptive design Graduate qualities for preservice health and welfare professionals for collaborative prevention and early intervention for child maltreatment: A qualitative study Using virtual patient simulation with partial task trainer: A quasi-experimental study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1