Optimizing patient safety: Unveiling the significance of cuff pressure in anaesthesia

IF 1.4 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tacc.2024.101493
Maria Valentim, João Barbosa, Mariana Almeida, Sara Alves, Helena Salgado
{"title":"Optimizing patient safety: Unveiling the significance of cuff pressure in anaesthesia","authors":"Maria Valentim,&nbsp;João Barbosa,&nbsp;Mariana Almeida,&nbsp;Sara Alves,&nbsp;Helena Salgado","doi":"10.1016/j.tacc.2024.101493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Inadequate pressure in the endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff can lead to compromised ventilation or airway injury. Accurate assessment of ETT cuff pressure is essential and should be performed using a manometer, with an optimal target range of 20–30 cmH<sub>2</sub>O.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>In this study, we aimed to audit ETT cuff pressures in the operating theatre of our institution, utilizing a manometer from VBM Medizintechnik GmbH™.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Following approval from the ethics committee, we conducted an audit from January 2023 to November 2023. A convenience sample was utilized, including adult patients who were intubated in our operating rooms (ORs) during either the morning or afternoon shifts at the time of the audit.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 49 patients were evaluated. Our findings revealed that 78 % of the patients had cuff pressures outside the recommended target range, with recorded pressures ranging from 18 cmH<sub>2</sub>O to 120 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, and a mean pressure of 63 cmH<sub>2</sub>O. Nitrous oxide was not used in any of the cases. Cuff inflation was performed using different syringe volumes: a 5 mL syringe was used in one case, a 10 mL syringe in 20 cases, and a 20 mL syringe in 28 cases, with a mean inflation volume of 9 mL. Statistical analysis indicated no significant difference in ETT cuff pressure related to the type of syringe used or the size of the endotracheal tube. Additionally, no correlation was found between the volume of air used for cuff inflation and the resulting ETT cuff pressure.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our audit revealed that only 22 % of the patients had cuff pressures within the recommended limits, highlighting a significant need for increased awareness and education. As maintaining appropriate cuff pressure is a standard of care, systematic implementation of reliable cuff pressure monitoring is strongly recommended.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":44534,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 101493"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221084402400162X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Inadequate pressure in the endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff can lead to compromised ventilation or airway injury. Accurate assessment of ETT cuff pressure is essential and should be performed using a manometer, with an optimal target range of 20–30 cmH2O.

Aim

In this study, we aimed to audit ETT cuff pressures in the operating theatre of our institution, utilizing a manometer from VBM Medizintechnik GmbH™.

Methods

Following approval from the ethics committee, we conducted an audit from January 2023 to November 2023. A convenience sample was utilized, including adult patients who were intubated in our operating rooms (ORs) during either the morning or afternoon shifts at the time of the audit.

Results

A total of 49 patients were evaluated. Our findings revealed that 78 % of the patients had cuff pressures outside the recommended target range, with recorded pressures ranging from 18 cmH2O to 120 cmH2O, and a mean pressure of 63 cmH2O. Nitrous oxide was not used in any of the cases. Cuff inflation was performed using different syringe volumes: a 5 mL syringe was used in one case, a 10 mL syringe in 20 cases, and a 20 mL syringe in 28 cases, with a mean inflation volume of 9 mL. Statistical analysis indicated no significant difference in ETT cuff pressure related to the type of syringe used or the size of the endotracheal tube. Additionally, no correlation was found between the volume of air used for cuff inflation and the resulting ETT cuff pressure.

Conclusion

Our audit revealed that only 22 % of the patients had cuff pressures within the recommended limits, highlighting a significant need for increased awareness and education. As maintaining appropriate cuff pressure is a standard of care, systematic implementation of reliable cuff pressure monitoring is strongly recommended.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化患者安全:揭示袖带压力在麻醉中的重要性
背景气管导管(ETT)袖带压力不足会导致通气功能受损或气道损伤。准确评估 ETT 袖带压力至关重要,应使用压力计进行评估,最佳目标范围为 20-30 cmH2O.Aim在本研究中,我们使用 VBM Medizintechnik GmbH™ 公司生产的压力计对本机构手术室的 ETT 袖带压力进行了审核。我们采用的是方便抽样法,抽样对象包括审核时在我们手术室(OR)上下午班插管的成年患者。我们的结果显示,78% 的患者的袖带压力超出了推荐的目标范围,记录的压力范围为 18 cmH2O 至 120 cmH2O,平均压力为 63 cmH2O。所有病例均未使用一氧化二氮。使用不同容量的注射器进行袖带充气:1 例使用 5 mL 注射器,20 例使用 10 mL 注射器,28 例使用 20 mL 注射器,平均充气量为 9 mL。统计分析表明,ETT 袖套压力的差异与使用的注射器类型或气管导管的大小没有明显关系。结论我们的审计结果表明,只有 22% 的患者的充气罩囊压力在建议范围内,这表明有必要加强宣传和教育。由于保持适当的充气罩囊压是一项护理标准,因此强烈建议系统地实施可靠的充气罩囊压监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
13.30%
发文量
60
审稿时长
33 days
期刊最新文献
The advantages of “closed” type management in intensive care units Vasoactive drugs for the management of maternal arterial hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. An updated integrative narrative review A knife to the neck; An airway challenge for the Anesthesiologist: A case report Optimizing patient safety: Unveiling the significance of cuff pressure in anaesthesia Evaluation of changes in Mallampati grading in patients undergoing elective urological procedures in prone and lithotomy positions- A prospective observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1