Extended aortic coverage in thoracic aortic endovascular repair is not associated with spinal cord ischemia

George C. Chachati MD , Sarah Yousef MD , James A. Brown MD , Nishant Agrawal , Shwetabh Tarun , Kristian Punu , Derek Serna-Gallegos MD, FACS , Julie Phillippi PhD , Ibrahim Sultan MD
{"title":"Extended aortic coverage in thoracic aortic endovascular repair is not associated with spinal cord ischemia","authors":"George C. Chachati MD ,&nbsp;Sarah Yousef MD ,&nbsp;James A. Brown MD ,&nbsp;Nishant Agrawal ,&nbsp;Shwetabh Tarun ,&nbsp;Kristian Punu ,&nbsp;Derek Serna-Gallegos MD, FACS ,&nbsp;Julie Phillippi PhD ,&nbsp;Ibrahim Sultan MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2024.08.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) remains a debilitating complication, occurring in 10% of patients. Studies have shown that extended aortic coverage is a risk factor for SCI. This study evaluates whether extended aortic length coverage is a significant risk factor for SCI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study retrospectively reviewed 277 consecutive patients who underwent TEVAR successfully between 2006 and 2021 at a single institution. The patients were classified into 2 groups: ≥205 mm and &lt;205 mm of thoracic aortic coverage. Analysis of variance was used to compare these variables and associated aortic coverage between the 2 groups. Univariable logistical regression was used to compare SCI and associated factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 269 patients who underwent successful TEVAR, 127 (47.2%) had ≥205 mm and 142 (52.8%) had &lt;205 mm of aorta coverage. Patients with ≥205 mm of thoracic aorta coverage were more likely to be smokers (<em>P</em> &lt; .01) and to have a history of previous stroke (<em>P</em> &lt; .05). Patients with extended coverage were more likely to receive a preoperative lumbar drain (LD) (<em>P</em> &lt; .01). Extended aortic coverage was not associated with a higher risk of SCI compared to standard aortic coverage (4.7% vs 4.2%; <em>P</em> = .84). Extended aortic coverage with or without a preoperative LD did not have an association with SCI (<em>P</em> = .91). Type II endoleaks were seen more in extended aortic coverage (<em>P</em> &lt; .01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Extended aortic coverage (compared with the standard approach) was not associated with a higher risk of SCI; however, this may have been mitigated by a higher prevalence of prophylactic lumbar drainage in this population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"21 ","pages":"Pages 366-371"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273624002328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) remains a debilitating complication, occurring in 10% of patients. Studies have shown that extended aortic coverage is a risk factor for SCI. This study evaluates whether extended aortic length coverage is a significant risk factor for SCI.

Methods

This study retrospectively reviewed 277 consecutive patients who underwent TEVAR successfully between 2006 and 2021 at a single institution. The patients were classified into 2 groups: ≥205 mm and <205 mm of thoracic aortic coverage. Analysis of variance was used to compare these variables and associated aortic coverage between the 2 groups. Univariable logistical regression was used to compare SCI and associated factors.

Results

Of the 269 patients who underwent successful TEVAR, 127 (47.2%) had ≥205 mm and 142 (52.8%) had <205 mm of aorta coverage. Patients with ≥205 mm of thoracic aorta coverage were more likely to be smokers (P < .01) and to have a history of previous stroke (P < .05). Patients with extended coverage were more likely to receive a preoperative lumbar drain (LD) (P < .01). Extended aortic coverage was not associated with a higher risk of SCI compared to standard aortic coverage (4.7% vs 4.2%; P = .84). Extended aortic coverage with or without a preoperative LD did not have an association with SCI (P = .91). Type II endoleaks were seen more in extended aortic coverage (P < .01).

Conclusions

Extended aortic coverage (compared with the standard approach) was not associated with a higher risk of SCI; however, this may have been mitigated by a higher prevalence of prophylactic lumbar drainage in this population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胸主动脉血管内修复术中的主动脉扩大覆盖与脊髓缺血无关
目的胸腔内血管主动脉修复术(TEVAR)后脊髓缺血(SCI)仍是一种使人衰弱的并发症,10% 的患者会出现这种情况。研究表明,延长主动脉覆盖范围是导致 SCI 的一个风险因素。本研究评估了主动脉长度延长覆盖是否是 SCI 的重要风险因素。方法本研究回顾性分析了 2006 年至 2021 年期间在一家机构成功接受 TEVAR 的 277 例连续患者。患者被分为两组:胸主动脉覆盖范围≥205 mm和<205 mm。方差分析用于比较两组之间的这些变量和相关的主动脉覆盖情况。结果 在成功接受 TEVAR 的 269 例患者中,127 例(47.2%)的主动脉覆盖范围≥205 mm,142 例(52.8%)的主动脉覆盖范围为 <205 mm。胸主动脉覆盖范围≥205 毫米的患者更有可能是吸烟者(P < .01)和既往有中风史者(P < .05)。覆盖范围扩大的患者更有可能在术前接受腰椎引流管(LD)治疗(P < .01)。与标准主动脉覆盖相比,扩大主动脉覆盖与较高的 SCI 风险无关(4.7% vs 4.2%; P = .84)。有无术前 LD 的主动脉扩大覆盖与 SCI 无关(P = .91)。结论扩大主动脉覆盖(与标准方法相比)与较高的 SCI 风险无关;但是,在该人群中,预防性腰椎引流的发生率较高,这可能会减轻 SCI 的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Repair of acute type A aortic dissection: The simplest solution is not always the best Are there etiology-specific risk factors for adverse outcomes in patients on Impella 5.5 support? Type B aortic dissection in Marfan patients after the David procedure: Insights from patient-specific simulation Reoperation after aortic root replacement and its impact on long-term survival Should we wait until the morning?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1