Mohamed Y.M. Mohsen , Shlash A. Luhaib , Nassar Alnassar , Omer A. Magzoub , Mohamed A.E. Abdel-Rahman , Mohammed Sallah , A. Abdelghafar Galahom
{"title":"Investigating the possible advantages of using different concentrations of transuranic elements with thorium-uranium dioxide as a fuel for PBMR-400","authors":"Mohamed Y.M. Mohsen , Shlash A. Luhaib , Nassar Alnassar , Omer A. Magzoub , Mohamed A.E. Abdel-Rahman , Mohammed Sallah , A. Abdelghafar Galahom","doi":"10.1016/j.pnucene.2024.105512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Reactor reactivity control materials play a crucial role in managing the stability and efficiency of nuclear reactors by regulating neutron flux and maintaining the desired reactivity levels throughout the reactor's operational cycle. This study explores the feasibility of using transuranic dioxide (TRUO₂) as reactivity control materials in pebble bed modular reactor 400 (PBMR-400) with thorium-based fuel. The TRU elements (Np, Pu, Am, and Cm) were extracted from spent uranium dioxide (UO₂) with a discharge burnup of 45 MWD/kgHM, following 30 years of cooling. The investigation covered four Th<sup>233</sup>UO<sub>2</sub>/TRUO<sub>2</sub> mixtures, with ThO<sub>2</sub> concentrations ranging from 75% to 95% and TRUO<sub>2</sub> from 5% to 25%. This aims to determine the optimal composition that maximizes the TRUO<sub>2</sub> concentration and minimizes ThO<sub>2</sub> while preserving reactor performance in order to achieve the longest fuel cycle length with lower k<sub>eff</sub> at the beginning of the fuel cycle (BOC) to avoid excess reactivity issues. Comprehensive neutronic analyses were conducted on these fuel mixtures, including burn-up, safety parameters, and flux and power distributions. The findings showed significant improvements in the PBMR-400's neutronic performance with the proposed fuel materials. From a safety, and economic standpoint, the optimal configuration was found to be 85% ThO<sub>2</sub> and 15% TRUO<sub>2</sub>, as it provided the longest fuel cycle length with less excess reactivity at BOC and lower PPF.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20617,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 105512"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149197024004621","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Reactor reactivity control materials play a crucial role in managing the stability and efficiency of nuclear reactors by regulating neutron flux and maintaining the desired reactivity levels throughout the reactor's operational cycle. This study explores the feasibility of using transuranic dioxide (TRUO₂) as reactivity control materials in pebble bed modular reactor 400 (PBMR-400) with thorium-based fuel. The TRU elements (Np, Pu, Am, and Cm) were extracted from spent uranium dioxide (UO₂) with a discharge burnup of 45 MWD/kgHM, following 30 years of cooling. The investigation covered four Th233UO2/TRUO2 mixtures, with ThO2 concentrations ranging from 75% to 95% and TRUO2 from 5% to 25%. This aims to determine the optimal composition that maximizes the TRUO2 concentration and minimizes ThO2 while preserving reactor performance in order to achieve the longest fuel cycle length with lower keff at the beginning of the fuel cycle (BOC) to avoid excess reactivity issues. Comprehensive neutronic analyses were conducted on these fuel mixtures, including burn-up, safety parameters, and flux and power distributions. The findings showed significant improvements in the PBMR-400's neutronic performance with the proposed fuel materials. From a safety, and economic standpoint, the optimal configuration was found to be 85% ThO2 and 15% TRUO2, as it provided the longest fuel cycle length with less excess reactivity at BOC and lower PPF.
期刊介绍:
Progress in Nuclear Energy is an international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear science and engineering. In keeping with the maturity of nuclear power, articles on safety, siting and environmental problems are encouraged, as are those associated with economics and fuel management. However, basic physics and engineering will remain an important aspect of the editorial policy. Articles published are either of a review nature or present new material in more depth. They are aimed at researchers and technically-oriented managers working in the nuclear energy field.
Please note the following:
1) PNE seeks high quality research papers which are medium to long in length. Short research papers should be submitted to the journal Annals in Nuclear Energy.
2) PNE reserves the right to reject papers which are based solely on routine application of computer codes used to produce reactor designs or explain existing reactor phenomena. Such papers, although worthy, are best left as laboratory reports whereas Progress in Nuclear Energy seeks papers of originality, which are archival in nature, in the fields of mathematical and experimental nuclear technology, including fission, fusion (blanket physics, radiation damage), safety, materials aspects, economics, etc.
3) Review papers, which may occasionally be invited, are particularly sought by the journal in these fields.