Multidimensional Sleep Health in Surrogate Decision-Makers of Critically Ill Patients.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE American Journal of Critical Care Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.4037/ajcc2024174
Grant A Pignatiello, Stephanie Griggs, Seth Alan Hoffer, Ronald L Hickman
{"title":"Multidimensional Sleep Health in Surrogate Decision-Makers of Critically Ill Patients.","authors":"Grant A Pignatiello, Stephanie Griggs, Seth Alan Hoffer, Ronald L Hickman","doi":"10.4037/ajcc2024174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Supporting the sleep health of surrogate decision-makers of patients in the intensive care unit is a research priority. However, few studies have approached sleep health as a multidimensional construct, instead focusing on 1 or 2 dimensions in isolation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To holistically examine the sleep health (satisfaction, timing, efficiency, duration) of surrogate decision-makers of critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This secondary analysis involved surrogate decision-makers of incapacitated intensive care unit patients at a tertiary medical center in northeastern Ohio (n = 19). Sleep-health data were captured by means of a subjective scale (satisfaction) and objectively (timing, efficiency, duration) by means of a wrist-worn accelerometer (Actiwatch Spectrum Plus; Philips Respironics). Upon enrollment, participants completed the satisfaction scale and wore the Actiwatch Spectrum Plus for 3 consecutive days. Descriptive statistics of the study variables were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A minority (15%) of the sample reported poor sleep satisfaction. Sleep timing variables were comparable to those found in other adult studies. Participants averaged approximately 6 hours of sleep per day with an average sleep efficiency of 83.7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite adequate satisfaction scores, intensive care unit surrogate decision-makers' sleep duration is inadequate and sleep efficiency is suboptimal. Sleep-health interventions may be needed in this at-risk population. Future research should consider the impact of surrogate decision-maker sleep health on their capacity to serve in the surrogate decision-maker role.</p>","PeriodicalId":7607,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Critical Care","volume":"33 6","pages":"468-472"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2024174","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Supporting the sleep health of surrogate decision-makers of patients in the intensive care unit is a research priority. However, few studies have approached sleep health as a multidimensional construct, instead focusing on 1 or 2 dimensions in isolation.

Objective: To holistically examine the sleep health (satisfaction, timing, efficiency, duration) of surrogate decision-makers of critically ill patients.

Methods: This secondary analysis involved surrogate decision-makers of incapacitated intensive care unit patients at a tertiary medical center in northeastern Ohio (n = 19). Sleep-health data were captured by means of a subjective scale (satisfaction) and objectively (timing, efficiency, duration) by means of a wrist-worn accelerometer (Actiwatch Spectrum Plus; Philips Respironics). Upon enrollment, participants completed the satisfaction scale and wore the Actiwatch Spectrum Plus for 3 consecutive days. Descriptive statistics of the study variables were evaluated.

Results: A minority (15%) of the sample reported poor sleep satisfaction. Sleep timing variables were comparable to those found in other adult studies. Participants averaged approximately 6 hours of sleep per day with an average sleep efficiency of 83.7%.

Conclusions: Despite adequate satisfaction scores, intensive care unit surrogate decision-makers' sleep duration is inadequate and sleep efficiency is suboptimal. Sleep-health interventions may be needed in this at-risk population. Future research should consider the impact of surrogate decision-maker sleep health on their capacity to serve in the surrogate decision-maker role.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重症患者代理决策者的多维睡眠健康。
背景:为重症监护病房患者的代理决策者提供睡眠健康支持是一项优先研究事项。然而,很少有研究将睡眠健康作为一个多维度的结构来研究,而是孤立地关注1或2个维度:全面考察重症患者代理决策者的睡眠健康状况(满意度、时间、效率、持续时间):这项二次分析涉及俄亥俄州东北部一家三级医疗中心失去行为能力的重症监护室患者的代理决策者(n = 19)。睡眠健康数据通过主观量表(满意度)和腕戴式加速度计(Actiwatch Spectrum Plus; Philips Respironics)客观采集(时间、效率、持续时间)。参与者在注册时填写满意度量表,并连续 3 天佩戴 Actiwatch Spectrum Plus。对研究变量的描述性统计进行了评估:少数样本(15%)报告睡眠满意度较差。睡眠时间变量与其他成人研究中发现的变量相当。参与者平均每天睡眠时间约为 6 小时,平均睡眠效率为 83.7%:尽管满意度得分较高,但重症监护室代理决策者的睡眠时间不足,睡眠效率不理想。可能需要对这一高危人群进行睡眠健康干预。未来的研究应考虑代理决策者的睡眠健康对其担任代理决策者角色能力的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The editors of the American Journal of Critical Care (AJCC) invite authors to submit original manuscripts describing investigations, advances, or observations from all specialties related to the care of critically and acutely ill patients. Papers promoting collaborative practice and research are encouraged. Manuscripts will be considered on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere and have been submitted solely to AJCC.
期刊最新文献
Association of Area Deprivation Index With Mortality in Critically Ill Adults With COVID-19. Chest Discomfort After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Clinical Pearls. Discussion Guide for the Wool Article. Factors Associated With Parent-Perceived Miscommunication in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1