Effect of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens supplementation on intramuscular fat accumulation and meat quality in finishing pigs.

IF 2.4 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Animal Bioscience Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.5713/ab.24.0399
Thami Wiseman Ndlandla, Fu Yuan Cheng, Chao Wei Huang, Kuo-Tai Yang
{"title":"Effect of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens supplementation on intramuscular fat accumulation and meat quality in finishing pigs.","authors":"Thami Wiseman Ndlandla, Fu Yuan Cheng, Chao Wei Huang, Kuo-Tai Yang","doi":"10.5713/ab.24.0399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated the potential of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens to improve growth performance and meat quality in finishing pigs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-two female Landrace × Duroc pigs, 21 weeks old with initial body weight 77.45±3.29 kg, were divided into two groups: a control group (basal diet) and a probiotic group (basal diet with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens at 1×109 CFU/kg). Body weight and average daily gain (ADG) were recorded at the start and at fortnight intervals for a 56-d feeding trial. At the end of the experiment, carcass traits, meat quality and intramuscular fat related gene expression of longissimus dorsi muscle were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The probiotic group showed significantly higher final body weight and D0-D56 ADG (p < 0.05). Additionally, the probiotic group had greater carcass weight, back fat thickness and marbling score (p < 0.05), while the lean meat percentage remained unchanged. Meat quality analysis revealed that the probiotic group had a higher b* value (5.47) (p < 0.05), and a lower shear value (p < 0.001), but there was no effect on the a* value and water holding capacity. Moreover, probiotic treatment increased the gene expression of fatty acid uptake and regulator, such as LPL, CD36, and SLC27A1 (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that the supplementation of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens not only enhanced growth performance and carcass weight in finishing pigs, but also improved marbling and tenderness in the longissimus dorsi muscle through the up-regulation of lipogenic-genes related to fat accumulation. This indicates its potential as feed additive to enhance pork quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":7825,"journal":{"name":"Animal Bioscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Bioscience","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.24.0399","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the potential of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens to improve growth performance and meat quality in finishing pigs.

Methods: Thirty-two female Landrace × Duroc pigs, 21 weeks old with initial body weight 77.45±3.29 kg, were divided into two groups: a control group (basal diet) and a probiotic group (basal diet with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens at 1×109 CFU/kg). Body weight and average daily gain (ADG) were recorded at the start and at fortnight intervals for a 56-d feeding trial. At the end of the experiment, carcass traits, meat quality and intramuscular fat related gene expression of longissimus dorsi muscle were analyzed.

Results: The probiotic group showed significantly higher final body weight and D0-D56 ADG (p < 0.05). Additionally, the probiotic group had greater carcass weight, back fat thickness and marbling score (p < 0.05), while the lean meat percentage remained unchanged. Meat quality analysis revealed that the probiotic group had a higher b* value (5.47) (p < 0.05), and a lower shear value (p < 0.001), but there was no effect on the a* value and water holding capacity. Moreover, probiotic treatment increased the gene expression of fatty acid uptake and regulator, such as LPL, CD36, and SLC27A1 (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the supplementation of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens not only enhanced growth performance and carcass weight in finishing pigs, but also improved marbling and tenderness in the longissimus dorsi muscle through the up-regulation of lipogenic-genes related to fat accumulation. This indicates its potential as feed additive to enhance pork quality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
补充淀粉样芽孢杆菌对育成猪肌肉脂肪积累和肉质的影响
目的:本研究评估了淀粉样芽孢杆菌改善育肥猪生长性能和肉质的潜力:本研究评估了淀粉样芽孢杆菌改善育成猪生长性能和肉质的潜力:将 32 头 21 周龄、初始体重为 77.45±3.29 kg 的雌性兰德马克×杜洛克猪分为两组:对照组(基础日粮)和益生菌组(基础日粮中添加 1×109 CFU/kg 的淀粉样芽孢杆菌)。在为期 56 天的饲喂试验中,开始时和每隔两周记录一次体重和平均日增重(ADG)。实验结束时,对胴体性状、肉质和背阔肌肌肉内脂肪相关基因表达进行了分析:结果:益生菌组的最终体重和D0-D56 ADG均显著高于益生菌组(p < 0.05)。此外,益生菌组的胴体重量、背脂厚度和大理石花纹评分更高(p < 0.05),而瘦肉率保持不变。肉质分析表明,益生菌组的 b* 值(5.47)更高(p < 0.05),剪切值更低(p < 0.001),但对 a* 值和持水能力没有影响。此外,益生菌处理增加了脂肪酸摄取和调节基因的表达,如 LPL、CD36 和 SLC27A1(p < 0.05):我们的研究结果表明,添加淀粉样芽孢杆菌不仅能提高育成猪的生长性能和胴体重量,还能通过上调与脂肪积累有关的生脂基因改善背长肌的大理石纹和嫩度。这表明它具有作为饲料添加剂提高猪肉品质的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Bioscience
Animal Bioscience AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
223
审稿时长
3 months
期刊最新文献
Proposing a strategy based on body-thermal status to improve the welfare of heat-stressed and water-deprived goats (Capra hircus). Dietary supplementation of protease and organic acid in poultry by-product meal-based diet in broilers. Effects of acute and chronic heat stress on the rumen microbiome in dairy goats. Investigation of single nucleotide polymorphisms in differentially expressed genes and proteins reveals the genetic basis of skeletal muscle growth differences between Tibetan and Large White pigs. Samae Dam chicken: a variety of the Pradu Hang Dam breed revealed from microsatellite genotyping data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1