Social, health and lifestyle-related determinants of older adults' preferences for place of death in South Tyrol, Italy - a cross-sectional survey study.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY BMC Geriatrics Pub Date : 2024-10-31 DOI:10.1186/s12877-024-05485-1
Dietmar Ausserhofer, Giuliano Piccoliori, Adolf Engl, Angelika Mahlknecht, Barbara Plagg, Verena Barbieri, Nicoletta Colletti, Stefano Lombardo, Timon Gärtner, Heike Wieser, Waltraud Tappeiner, Christian J Wiedermann
{"title":"Social, health and lifestyle-related determinants of older adults' preferences for place of death in South Tyrol, Italy - a cross-sectional survey study.","authors":"Dietmar Ausserhofer, Giuliano Piccoliori, Adolf Engl, Angelika Mahlknecht, Barbara Plagg, Verena Barbieri, Nicoletta Colletti, Stefano Lombardo, Timon Gärtner, Heike Wieser, Waltraud Tappeiner, Christian J Wiedermann","doi":"10.1186/s12877-024-05485-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As the global aging population expands, understanding older adults' preferences for place of death becomes pivotal in ensuring person-centered end-of-life care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the influence of sociodemographic, health, and lifestyle-related factors on end-of-life care preferences of older adults in South Tyrol, Italy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Employing a cross-sectional design, a population-based survey was conducted with a stratified probabilistic sample of adults aged ≥ 75 years in South Tyrol (Autonomous Province of Bolzano/Bozen, Italy). From a randomly selected sample of 3,600 older adults, participants were invited to respond to a questionnaire that included items on older adults' preferences for place of death and socio-demographic and health- and lifestyle-related factors, including frailty (e.g., PRISMA-7). Descriptive and multinomial logistic regression analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority (55.3%) of the 1,695 older adults (participation rate: 47%) expressed a preference for dying at home and 12.7% indicated a desire for specialized end-of-life care in a healthcare facility. However, 27.9% refrained from disclosing their end-of-life care preferences. The factors influencing these preferences concerning the place of death included age, native language, educational level, living situation, and community. Compared to the preference of dying at own home or home of family or friends, older adults aged ≥ 85 years (OR = 0.57, P = 0.002) and living in an urban area (OR = 0.40, P < 0.001) were less likely to prefer dying at a hospital, palliative care unit, or hospice. Older adults living alone (OR = 1.90, P < 0.001), Italian-speaking (OR = 1.46, P = 0.03), and those with an educational level above high school (OR = 1.69, P = 0.002) were more likely to prefer dying at a hospital, palliative care unit, or hospice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>End-of-life care preferences among older adults in South Tyrol were associated with socio-demographic, yet not health- and lifestyle-related factors. Recognizing and integrating these preferences is essential for developing, implementing, and evaluating interventions to promote advance care planning and provide effective, patient-centered end-of-life care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"24 1","pages":"899"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11526506/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05485-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As the global aging population expands, understanding older adults' preferences for place of death becomes pivotal in ensuring person-centered end-of-life care.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the influence of sociodemographic, health, and lifestyle-related factors on end-of-life care preferences of older adults in South Tyrol, Italy.

Methods: Employing a cross-sectional design, a population-based survey was conducted with a stratified probabilistic sample of adults aged ≥ 75 years in South Tyrol (Autonomous Province of Bolzano/Bozen, Italy). From a randomly selected sample of 3,600 older adults, participants were invited to respond to a questionnaire that included items on older adults' preferences for place of death and socio-demographic and health- and lifestyle-related factors, including frailty (e.g., PRISMA-7). Descriptive and multinomial logistic regression analyses were performed.

Results: The majority (55.3%) of the 1,695 older adults (participation rate: 47%) expressed a preference for dying at home and 12.7% indicated a desire for specialized end-of-life care in a healthcare facility. However, 27.9% refrained from disclosing their end-of-life care preferences. The factors influencing these preferences concerning the place of death included age, native language, educational level, living situation, and community. Compared to the preference of dying at own home or home of family or friends, older adults aged ≥ 85 years (OR = 0.57, P = 0.002) and living in an urban area (OR = 0.40, P < 0.001) were less likely to prefer dying at a hospital, palliative care unit, or hospice. Older adults living alone (OR = 1.90, P < 0.001), Italian-speaking (OR = 1.46, P = 0.03), and those with an educational level above high school (OR = 1.69, P = 0.002) were more likely to prefer dying at a hospital, palliative care unit, or hospice.

Conclusions: End-of-life care preferences among older adults in South Tyrol were associated with socio-demographic, yet not health- and lifestyle-related factors. Recognizing and integrating these preferences is essential for developing, implementing, and evaluating interventions to promote advance care planning and provide effective, patient-centered end-of-life care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意大利南蒂罗尔老年人对死亡地点偏好的社会、健康和生活方式相关决定因素--横断面调查研究。
背景:随着全球老龄化人口的增加,了解老年人对死亡地点的偏好对于确保以人为本的临终关怀至关重要:本研究旨在调查社会人口、健康和生活方式相关因素对意大利南蒂罗尔老年人临终关怀偏好的影响:采用横断面设计,对南蒂罗尔州(意大利博尔扎诺/博岑自治省)年龄≥ 75 岁的成年人进行了分层概率抽样调查。从随机抽取的 3,600 名老年人中,邀请参与者回答一份调查问卷,其中包括老年人对死亡地点的偏好、社会人口学因素以及健康和生活方式相关因素,包括体弱(如 PRISMA-7)。分析结果显示,大多数(55.3%)老年人对死亡地点有偏好:在 1,695 名老年人(参与率:47%)中,大多数(55.3%)表示希望在家中去世,12.7% 表示希望在医疗机构接受专门的临终关怀。然而,27.9%的人没有透露他们的临终关怀偏好。影响这些死亡地点偏好的因素包括年龄、母语、教育水平、居住环境和社区。与在自己家中或亲友家中死亡的偏好相比,年龄≥ 85 岁(OR = 0.57,P = 0.002)和居住在城市地区(OR = 0.40,P 结论)的老年人更倾向于在自己家中或亲友家中死亡:南蒂罗尔老年人的临终关怀偏好与社会人口因素有关,但与健康和生活方式相关因素无关。认识并整合这些偏好对于制定、实施和评估干预措施以促进预先护理规划和提供有效的、以患者为中心的临终关怀至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
期刊最新文献
Impact of dementia on post-hip fracture walking ability: a stratified analysis based on pre-fracture mobility in Swedish cohorts of older adults. Quality of life and associated characteristics in long-term care residents with advanced dementia in Macao: a cross-sectional study. Home physical therapy versus telerehabilitation in improving motor function and quality of life in Parkinson's disease: a randomized controlled trial. Psychotropic use for behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Association of serum creatinine-cystatin C ratio with all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality in US adults: a nationwide cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1