Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine on Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia Surgery: A Systematic Review of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Clinical therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.09.027
Xian-Xue Wang, Jing Dai, Hui-Wei Deng, Qi Wang, Yun Liu, Hua-Jing Guo
{"title":"Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine on Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia Surgery: A Systematic Review of a Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Xian-Xue Wang, Jing Dai, Hui-Wei Deng, Qi Wang, Yun Liu, Hua-Jing Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.09.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is a common neurologic complication that occurs after surgery, which prolongs the hospital stay of patients to a certain extent, increases the occurrence of complications, and even leads to the patient's death. Intravenous lidocaine can reduce perioperative inflammatory response in patients undergoing surgery, but its effect on postoperative cognitive function has not been systematically evaluated. Notably, prior findings regarding the impact of intravenous lidocaine on postoperative cognitive function have been variable. Therefore, on this basis, this study explored the effects of intravenous lidocaine on postoperative cognitive function of patients undergoing general anesthesia through a systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, Wanfang Medical Database, China Biomedical Literature Database, and China Academic Journals Full-Text Database were searched from inception to February 2024 for relevant studies that investigated effect of intravenous lidocaine on POCD in patients undergoing general anesthesia surgery. Key data obtained from the referenced literature included the prevalence of POCD, scores from the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and perioperative serum concentrations of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and central nervous specific protein (S-100β) protein, serving as biomarkers for central nervous system specificity. Meta-analysis of data was performed using RevMan5.3 software. The software Trial Sequential Analysis (version 0.9) (TSA) was used to analyze high-quality literature focusing on POCD outcome indicators to explore the reliability of the results of meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Twenty-five studies were included for quality evaluation and data analysis. The studies compared the effect of intravenous lidocaine on the incidence of POCD in patients undergoing surgery at different time points. Subgroup analysis was used to investigate the incidence of POCD at different time points. The results showed that intravenous lidocaine significantly reduced the incidence of POCD at 1, 3, 7, 9 days and 1 year after surgery compared with the control group (on the first day postoperatively: odds ratio (OR) = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.32-0.69, P < 0.001; postoperative day 3: OR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.25-0.72, P = 0.002; postoperative day 7: OR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.21-0.55, P < 0.001; postoperative day 9: OR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.17-0.61, P < 0.001; 1 year postoperatively: OR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.28-0.54, P < 0.001). The incidence of POCD in patients undergoing general anesthesia at postoperative day 1 with lidocaine was analyzed sequentially. The results showed that with the increase of the included sample size, the Z-curve still did not exceed the TSA boundary and did not reach the required information size. Fourteen studies compared MMSE scores before, 1, 2, 3, and 7 days after surgery between the 2 groups. The results showed that the MMSE score of lidocaine group was significantly higher than that of control group on the first and third postoperative day, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the serum concentrations of neuron-specific enolase and central nervous specific protein in the lidocaine group significantly decreased postoperatively and on the first and third day postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Perioperative intravenous lidocaine may improve postoperative cognitive function and reduce the incidence of POCD. However, limited to the current situation of low quality and small sample size, TSA analysis suggests the need for larger high-quality sample to confirm the accuracy of our findings.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>This is a systematic review, equivalent to a review, and does not require clinical trial registration. We have registered on PROSPERO.</p><p><strong>Registration number: </strong>CRD42023493992.</p>","PeriodicalId":10699,"journal":{"name":"Clinical therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.09.027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is a common neurologic complication that occurs after surgery, which prolongs the hospital stay of patients to a certain extent, increases the occurrence of complications, and even leads to the patient's death. Intravenous lidocaine can reduce perioperative inflammatory response in patients undergoing surgery, but its effect on postoperative cognitive function has not been systematically evaluated. Notably, prior findings regarding the impact of intravenous lidocaine on postoperative cognitive function have been variable. Therefore, on this basis, this study explored the effects of intravenous lidocaine on postoperative cognitive function of patients undergoing general anesthesia through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, Wanfang Medical Database, China Biomedical Literature Database, and China Academic Journals Full-Text Database were searched from inception to February 2024 for relevant studies that investigated effect of intravenous lidocaine on POCD in patients undergoing general anesthesia surgery. Key data obtained from the referenced literature included the prevalence of POCD, scores from the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and perioperative serum concentrations of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and central nervous specific protein (S-100β) protein, serving as biomarkers for central nervous system specificity. Meta-analysis of data was performed using RevMan5.3 software. The software Trial Sequential Analysis (version 0.9) (TSA) was used to analyze high-quality literature focusing on POCD outcome indicators to explore the reliability of the results of meta-analysis.

Findings: Twenty-five studies were included for quality evaluation and data analysis. The studies compared the effect of intravenous lidocaine on the incidence of POCD in patients undergoing surgery at different time points. Subgroup analysis was used to investigate the incidence of POCD at different time points. The results showed that intravenous lidocaine significantly reduced the incidence of POCD at 1, 3, 7, 9 days and 1 year after surgery compared with the control group (on the first day postoperatively: odds ratio (OR) = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.32-0.69, P < 0.001; postoperative day 3: OR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.25-0.72, P = 0.002; postoperative day 7: OR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.21-0.55, P < 0.001; postoperative day 9: OR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.17-0.61, P < 0.001; 1 year postoperatively: OR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.28-0.54, P < 0.001). The incidence of POCD in patients undergoing general anesthesia at postoperative day 1 with lidocaine was analyzed sequentially. The results showed that with the increase of the included sample size, the Z-curve still did not exceed the TSA boundary and did not reach the required information size. Fourteen studies compared MMSE scores before, 1, 2, 3, and 7 days after surgery between the 2 groups. The results showed that the MMSE score of lidocaine group was significantly higher than that of control group on the first and third postoperative day, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the serum concentrations of neuron-specific enolase and central nervous specific protein in the lidocaine group significantly decreased postoperatively and on the first and third day postoperatively.

Implications: Perioperative intravenous lidocaine may improve postoperative cognitive function and reduce the incidence of POCD. However, limited to the current situation of low quality and small sample size, TSA analysis suggests the need for larger high-quality sample to confirm the accuracy of our findings.

Clinical trial number: This is a systematic review, equivalent to a review, and does not require clinical trial registration. We have registered on PROSPERO.

Registration number: CRD42023493992.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
静脉注射利多卡因对全身麻醉手术患者术后认知功能障碍的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾
目的:术后认知功能障碍(POCD)是手术后常见的神经系统并发症,在一定程度上延长了患者的住院时间,增加了并发症的发生,甚至导致患者死亡。静脉注射利多卡因可以减轻手术患者围手术期的炎症反应,但其对术后认知功能的影响尚未得到系统评估。值得注意的是,之前关于静脉注射利多卡因对术后认知功能影响的研究结果并不一致。因此,在此基础上,本研究通过系统综述和荟萃分析探讨了静脉注射利多卡因对全身麻醉患者术后认知功能的影响:方法:检索了Pubmed、Cochrane Library、Embase、Medline、万方医学数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库和中国学术期刊全文数据库中从开始到2024年2月有关静脉注射利多卡因对全身麻醉手术患者术后认知功能影响的相关研究。从参考文献中获得的关键数据包括 POCD 的患病率、迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)的评分以及围手术期血清中作为中枢神经系统特异性生物标志物的神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)和中枢神经特异性蛋白(S-100β)的浓度。数据的 Meta 分析使用 RevMan5.3 软件进行。使用软件Trial Sequential Analysis(0.9版)(TSA)分析以POCD结果指标为重点的高质量文献,以探讨荟萃分析结果的可靠性:共纳入 25 项研究进行质量评估和数据分析。这些研究比较了静脉注射利多卡因对不同时间点手术患者 POCD 发生率的影响。采用亚组分析法研究了不同时间点的 POCD 发生率。结果显示,与对照组相比,静脉注射利多卡因可显著降低术后1、3、7、9天和1年的POCD发生率(术后第一天:比值比(OR)= 0.48,95% CI:0.32-0.69,P < 0.001;术后第 3 天:OR = 0.42,95% CI:0.25-0.72,P = 0.002;术后第 7 天:OR = 0.34,95% CI:0.21-0.55,P < 0.001;术后第 9 天:OR = 0.32,95% CI:0.17-0.61,P < 0.001;术后 1 年:OR = 0.39,95% CI:0.28-0.54,P <0.001)。对术后第1天使用利多卡因进行全身麻醉的患者的POCD发生率进行了连续分析。结果显示,随着纳入样本量的增加,Z 曲线仍未超过 TSA 边界,也未达到所需的信息量。14 项研究比较了两组患者术前、术后 1 天、2 天、3 天和 7 天的 MMSE 评分。结果显示,利多卡因组术后第1天和第3天的MMSE评分明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与对照组相比,利多卡因组神经元特异性烯醇化酶和中枢神经特异性蛋白的血清浓度在术后第1天和第3天明显降低:启示:围手术期静脉注射利多卡因可改善术后认知功能,降低 POCD 的发生率。然而,限于目前样本质量低、样本量小的现状,TSA分析表明需要更多高质量的样本来证实我们研究结果的准确性:本研究为系统性综述,等同于综述,无需进行临床试验注册。我们已在 PROSPERO 上注册:CRD42023493992。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical therapeutics
Clinical therapeutics 医学-药学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
154
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Therapeutics provides peer-reviewed, rapid publication of recent developments in drug and other therapies as well as in diagnostics, pharmacoeconomics, health policy, treatment outcomes, and innovations in drug and biologics research. In addition Clinical Therapeutics features updates on specific topics collated by expert Topic Editors. Clinical Therapeutics is read by a large international audience of scientists and clinicians in a variety of research, academic, and clinical practice settings. Articles are indexed by all major biomedical abstracting databases.
期刊最新文献
The Role of Sex and Gender in Precision Emergency Medicine: A Scoping Review and Proposed Hierarchy. Sex Differences in Testing for Pulmonary Embolism Among Emergency Department Patients Aged 18-49 by Chief Complaint. The Efficacy Research of Prophylactic PEG-rhG-CSF in Preventing Neutropenia in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Docetaxel-Based Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Analysis. Correlation Between Vitamin D, Inflammatory Markers, and T Lymphocytes With the Severity of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and its Effect on the Risk of Acute Exacerbation: A Single Cross-sectional Study. Understanding Variation Among Medical Device Reporting Sources: A Study of the MAUDE Database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1