Endovascular treatment of aortic coarctation using covered balloon-expandable stents-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2024.1439458
Fei He, Zhongze Cao, Chen Wang, Shyamal Premaratne, Benjamin W Starnes, Chang Shu, Wayne W Zhang
{"title":"Endovascular treatment of aortic coarctation using covered balloon-expandable stents-a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Fei He, Zhongze Cao, Chen Wang, Shyamal Premaratne, Benjamin W Starnes, Chang Shu, Wayne W Zhang","doi":"10.3389/fcvm.2024.1439458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Balloon dilation followed by balloon-expandable stent implantation is an effective treatment for improving hemodynamic status in patients with coarctation of the aorta (CoA). However, limited evidence exists regarding the safety and efficacy of covered balloon-expandable stents (CBSs) in a large cohort. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the overall success rates, hemodynamic and anatomical benefits, complications, and mid-term results of CBSs in treating CoA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systemically searched for studies reporting outcomes of CBSs in treating CoA. Single-group rate meta-analyses were performed to calculate estimated pooled procedural success rates, the incidence of complications, and re-coarctation rates. A meta-analysis using standardized mean differences was conducted to compare pre- and postoperative trans-coarctation pressure gradients (PGs), coarctation diameter, and overall changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP). Subgroup analyses were performed to identify potential sources of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final analysis included 12 studies with a total of 411 patients. The estimated pooled procedural success rate was 100% [95% confidence interval (CI): 98%-100%, <i>I</i>2 = 0, <i>P</i> = 0.78]. Significant decreases in trans-coarctation PGs and SBP were observed. The pooled incidences of stent-related, aortic, and access site complications were 2% (95% CI: 0%-5%, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 30.4%, <i>P</i> = 0.15), 2% (95% CI: 0%-4%, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%, <i>P</i> = 0.76), and 3% (95% CI: 1%-7%, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 52.9%, <i>P</i> = 0.02), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that implantation of BeGraft stents was related to a significantly higher incidence of access site complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Covered balloon-expandable stent implantation in treating CoA is safe and effective with high procedural success rates, an acceptable incidence of complications, and a low incidence of re-coarctation.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, PROSPERO (CRD42023430356).</p>","PeriodicalId":12414,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"11 ","pages":"1439458"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11524840/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1439458","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Balloon dilation followed by balloon-expandable stent implantation is an effective treatment for improving hemodynamic status in patients with coarctation of the aorta (CoA). However, limited evidence exists regarding the safety and efficacy of covered balloon-expandable stents (CBSs) in a large cohort. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the overall success rates, hemodynamic and anatomical benefits, complications, and mid-term results of CBSs in treating CoA.

Methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systemically searched for studies reporting outcomes of CBSs in treating CoA. Single-group rate meta-analyses were performed to calculate estimated pooled procedural success rates, the incidence of complications, and re-coarctation rates. A meta-analysis using standardized mean differences was conducted to compare pre- and postoperative trans-coarctation pressure gradients (PGs), coarctation diameter, and overall changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP). Subgroup analyses were performed to identify potential sources of heterogeneity.

Results: The final analysis included 12 studies with a total of 411 patients. The estimated pooled procedural success rate was 100% [95% confidence interval (CI): 98%-100%, I2 = 0, P = 0.78]. Significant decreases in trans-coarctation PGs and SBP were observed. The pooled incidences of stent-related, aortic, and access site complications were 2% (95% CI: 0%-5%, I 2 = 30.4%, P = 0.15), 2% (95% CI: 0%-4%, I 2 = 0%, P = 0.76), and 3% (95% CI: 1%-7%, I 2 = 52.9%, P = 0.02), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that implantation of BeGraft stents was related to a significantly higher incidence of access site complications.

Conclusion: Covered balloon-expandable stent implantation in treating CoA is safe and effective with high procedural success rates, an acceptable incidence of complications, and a low incidence of re-coarctation.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, PROSPERO (CRD42023430356).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用覆盖式球囊扩张支架对主动脉瓣闭塞进行血管内治疗--系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:球囊扩张后再植入球囊扩张支架是改善主动脉共弯(CoA)患者血液动力学状况的有效治疗方法。然而,在大样本人群中,关于有盖球囊扩张支架(CBS)安全性和有效性的证据有限。在这项荟萃分析中,我们旨在评估 CBS 治疗 CoA 的总体成功率、血液动力学和解剖学优势、并发症和中期效果:我们在 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库中系统检索了报告 CBS 治疗 CoA 结果的研究。进行了单组比率荟萃分析,以计算估计的集合手术成功率、并发症发生率和再梗塞率。使用标准化平均差进行了一项荟萃分析,以比较术前和术后跨直管压力梯度(PGs)、直管直径和收缩压(SBP)的总体变化。进行了分组分析以确定潜在的异质性来源:最终分析包括 12 项研究,共有 411 名患者。估计汇总的手术成功率为 100%[95% 置信区间 (CI):98%-100%,I2 = 0,P = 0.78]。经冠状动脉 PGs 和 SBP 显著下降。支架相关并发症、主动脉并发症和入路部位并发症的汇总发生率分别为 2%(95% CI:0%-5%,I 2 = 30.4%,P = 0.15)、2%(95% CI:0%-4%,I 2 = 0%,P = 0.76)和 3%(95% CI:1%-7%,I 2 = 52.9%,P = 0.02)。亚组分析表明,植入BeGraft支架与入路部位并发症的发生率显著升高有关:有盖球囊扩张支架植入治疗CoA安全有效,手术成功率高,并发症发生率可接受,再梗塞发生率低。系统综述注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/,PROSPERO (CRD42023430356)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
3529
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers? Which frontiers? Where exactly are the frontiers of cardiovascular medicine? And who should be defining these frontiers? At Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine we believe it is worth being curious to foresee and explore beyond the current frontiers. In other words, we would like, through the articles published by our community journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, to anticipate the future of cardiovascular medicine, and thus better prevent cardiovascular disorders and improve therapeutic options and outcomes of our patients.
期刊最新文献
Genetically predicted smoking and body mass index mediate the relationship between insomnia and myocardial infarction. The relationship between dietary vitamin B1 intake and severe abdominal aortic calcification among the general population in the United States. Wearable Patch ECG monitors and transesophageal electrophysiological study for diagnosing palpitations of unknown origin. Case Report: Allelic and biallelic variants in coagulation factor XI cause factor XI deficiency. Effect of low-dose rivaroxaban on bleeding events in low-weight patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1