A review of OSHA-permissible exposure limits for occupational carcinogens in relation to quantitative risk assessments based on epidemiological findings.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene Pub Date : 2024-10-31 DOI:10.1080/15459624.2024.2406234
Robert M Park
{"title":"A review of OSHA-permissible exposure limits for occupational carcinogens in relation to quantitative risk assessments based on epidemiological findings.","authors":"Robert M Park","doi":"10.1080/15459624.2024.2406234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A very small proportion of all chemicals in commerce have <i>occupational exposure limits</i> (OELs) based on quantitative risk assessments which require estimates of exposure-response relationships (XRs). For only 18 of the 94 chemicals declared by NIOSH to be carcinogens were human XRs reported in or calculable from published reports. For the 18 carcinogens, 96 such XRs could be derived (corresponding to chemicals with multiple associated cancer end-points and/or multiple source studies). Twenty-four of 96 XR estimates came directly from reported statistical models (on continuous cumulative exposure), 45 were derived from summary study-population attributes, and 27 came from categorical analyses. Using the 96 XRs, OEL conferring one-per-thousand excess lifetime risk were calculated. OSHA's OEL, <i>permissible exposure limits</i> (PEL) were then compared to OEL derived from the 96 XRs. For 88 of the 96 calculated OELs (for which a corresponding PEL exists) all but 10 fell below the current PEL. Thirty-four OEL estimates were 10- to 100-fold below the PEL and 21 were greater than 100-fold below the PEL. This same pattern was observed using the different methods for deriving XRs. These findings can guide priorities in setting standards and the method is not limited to carcinogens.</p>","PeriodicalId":16599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2024.2406234","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A very small proportion of all chemicals in commerce have occupational exposure limits (OELs) based on quantitative risk assessments which require estimates of exposure-response relationships (XRs). For only 18 of the 94 chemicals declared by NIOSH to be carcinogens were human XRs reported in or calculable from published reports. For the 18 carcinogens, 96 such XRs could be derived (corresponding to chemicals with multiple associated cancer end-points and/or multiple source studies). Twenty-four of 96 XR estimates came directly from reported statistical models (on continuous cumulative exposure), 45 were derived from summary study-population attributes, and 27 came from categorical analyses. Using the 96 XRs, OEL conferring one-per-thousand excess lifetime risk were calculated. OSHA's OEL, permissible exposure limits (PEL) were then compared to OEL derived from the 96 XRs. For 88 of the 96 calculated OELs (for which a corresponding PEL exists) all but 10 fell below the current PEL. Thirty-four OEL estimates were 10- to 100-fold below the PEL and 21 were greater than 100-fold below the PEL. This same pattern was observed using the different methods for deriving XRs. These findings can guide priorities in setting standards and the method is not limited to carcinogens.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于流行病学研究结果的定量风险评估与职业安全和健康管理局职业致癌物允许接触限值有关的审查。
在所有商业化学品中,只有极少数化学品的职业接触限值(OELs)是以定量风险评估为基础的,而定量风险评估需要对接触-反应关系(XRs)进行估算。在 NIOSH 宣布为致癌物质的 94 种化学品中,只有 18 种化学品的人体 XR 值在已公布的报告中有所报告或可以计算。在这 18 种致癌物质中,有 96 种可以得出此类 XR(对应于具有多个相关癌症终点和/或多个来源研究的化学品)。在 96 个 XR 估计值中,24 个直接来自报告的统计模型(连续累积暴露量),45 个来自研究人群属性摘要,27 个来自分类分析。利用这 96 个 XR,计算出了千分之一超额终生风险的 OEL。然后将 OSHA 的 OEL、允许接触限值 (PEL) 与 96 个 XR 得出的 OEL 进行比较。在计算出的 96 个 OEL 中,有 88 个 OEL(存在相应的 PEL)低于当前的 PEL,只有 10 个除外。34 个 OEL 估计值比 PEL 低 10 到 100 倍,21 个比 PEL 低 100 倍以上。使用不同的 XRs 推算方法也观察到了同样的模式。这些发现可以指导制定标准的优先次序,而且该方法并不局限于致癌物质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene ( JOEH ) is a joint publication of the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA®) and ACGIH®. The JOEH is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to enhancing the knowledge and practice of occupational and environmental hygiene and safety by widely disseminating research articles and applied studies of the highest quality. The JOEH provides a written medium for the communication of ideas, methods, processes, and research in core and emerging areas of occupational and environmental hygiene. Core domains include, but are not limited to: exposure assessment, control strategies, ergonomics, and risk analysis. Emerging domains include, but are not limited to: sensor technology, emergency preparedness and response, changing workforce, and management and analysis of "big" data.
期刊最新文献
Application of the Tier 3 NIOSH occupational exposure banding process for the graphene family of nanomaterials: A case study. Caution with self-reported occupational noise exposures. Lessons learned in establishing and sustaining elastomeric half mask respirator-based respiratory protection programs: An impact evaluation. Removal efficiency of antineoplastic drug cyclophosphamide by hypochlorous acid. Response to the comments from Mr. Shkembi.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1