Mothers Falling Asleep During Infant Feeding.

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1542/peds.2024-066072
Fern R Hauck, Rachel Y Moon, Stephen M Kerr, Michael J Corwin, Timothy Heeren, Eve Colson, Margaret G Parker, Ann Kellams
{"title":"Mothers Falling Asleep During Infant Feeding.","authors":"Fern R Hauck, Rachel Y Moon, Stephen M Kerr, Michael J Corwin, Timothy Heeren, Eve Colson, Margaret G Parker, Ann Kellams","doi":"10.1542/peds.2024-066072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p></p><p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Falling asleep while feeding (FAF) infants is common. Our primary objectives were to examine (1) maternally reported prevalence of FAF and if planned; (2) association between FAF and sociodemographic factors, feeding method, and sleep location; and (3) if receipt of education about safe sleep and bedsharing risks was associated with FAF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the Social Media and Risk-reduction Training study, US mothers of newborns were randomized to educational messaging promoting infant safe sleep or breastfeeding. We analyzed data from 1259 mothers who responded to the postpartum survey (mean infant age, 11.2 weeks). We used generalized estimating equation logistic regression models to examine the extent that sociodemographic characteristics, feeding type, usual nighttime feeding location, and intervention group were associated with FAF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 28.2% of mothers reported FAF usually or sometimes in the last 2 weeks, 83.4% of whom reported that FAF was unplanned. There were no differences in the odds of FAF by sociodemographic factors. Compared with mothers whose nighttime feeding location was their bed, mothers who reported feeding in a chair were less likely to FAF (33.6% versus 16.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.56). FAF was reported less frequently by mothers who received safe sleep interventions (15.6%), compared with mothers who received breastfeeding interventions (33.0%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.65).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FAF is reported commonly among US mothers and is predominantly unplanned. Mothers who received safe sleep messaging were less likely to report FAF. New parents need guidance on planning for optimal safety during infant feeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-066072","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Falling asleep while feeding (FAF) infants is common. Our primary objectives were to examine (1) maternally reported prevalence of FAF and if planned; (2) association between FAF and sociodemographic factors, feeding method, and sleep location; and (3) if receipt of education about safe sleep and bedsharing risks was associated with FAF.

Methods: In the Social Media and Risk-reduction Training study, US mothers of newborns were randomized to educational messaging promoting infant safe sleep or breastfeeding. We analyzed data from 1259 mothers who responded to the postpartum survey (mean infant age, 11.2 weeks). We used generalized estimating equation logistic regression models to examine the extent that sociodemographic characteristics, feeding type, usual nighttime feeding location, and intervention group were associated with FAF.

Results: A total of 28.2% of mothers reported FAF usually or sometimes in the last 2 weeks, 83.4% of whom reported that FAF was unplanned. There were no differences in the odds of FAF by sociodemographic factors. Compared with mothers whose nighttime feeding location was their bed, mothers who reported feeding in a chair were less likely to FAF (33.6% versus 16.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.56). FAF was reported less frequently by mothers who received safe sleep interventions (15.6%), compared with mothers who received breastfeeding interventions (33.0%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.65).

Conclusions: FAF is reported commonly among US mothers and is predominantly unplanned. Mothers who received safe sleep messaging were less likely to report FAF. New parents need guidance on planning for optimal safety during infant feeding.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
母亲在喂养婴儿时睡着了。
背景和目的:婴儿喂奶时睡着(FAF)是一种常见现象。我们的主要目的是研究:(1)母亲报告的FAF发生率以及是否计划发生;(2)FAF与社会人口因素、喂养方式和睡眠地点之间的关系;以及(3)接受安全睡眠和分床风险教育是否与FAF有关:在 "社交媒体与降低风险培训 "研究中,美国新生儿母亲被随机分配接受促进婴儿安全睡眠或母乳喂养的教育信息。我们分析了 1259 位回答产后调查的母亲的数据(婴儿平均年龄为 11.2 周)。我们使用了广义估计方程逻辑回归模型来研究社会人口特征、喂养类型、夜间通常喂养地点和干预组与 FAF 的相关程度:共有 28.2% 的母亲表示在过去两周内通常或有时会喂养婴儿,其中 83.4% 的母亲表示喂养婴儿是计划外的。不同的社会人口因素导致发生 FAF 的几率没有差异。与夜间喂奶地点为床上的母亲相比,在椅子上喂奶的母亲发生婴儿流产的几率较低(33.6% 对 16.8%;调整后的几率比为 0.41;95% 置信区间为 0.31-0.56)。与接受母乳喂养干预的母亲(33.0%;调整后的几率比为 0.40;95% 置信区间为 0.25-0.65)相比,接受安全睡眠干预的母亲(15.6%)报告 FAF 的频率较低:结论:据报道,FAF 在美国母亲中很常见,而且主要是计划外的。收到安全睡眠信息的母亲报告 FAF 的可能性较低。新手父母需要在婴儿喂养期间获得最佳安全计划指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatrics
Pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
791
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Pediatrics® journal is the official flagship journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). It is widely cited in the field of pediatric medicine and is recognized as the leading journal in the field. The journal publishes original research and evidence-based articles, which provide authoritative information to help readers stay up-to-date with the latest developments in pediatric medicine. The content is peer-reviewed and undergoes rigorous evaluation to ensure its quality and reliability. Pediatrics also serves as a valuable resource for conducting new research studies and supporting education and training activities in the field of pediatrics. It aims to enhance the quality of pediatric outpatient and inpatient care by disseminating valuable knowledge and insights. As of 2023, Pediatrics has an impressive Journal Impact Factor (IF) Score of 8.0. The IF is a measure of a journal's influence and importance in the scientific community, with higher scores indicating a greater impact. This score reflects the significance and reach of the research published in Pediatrics, further establishing its prominence in the field of pediatric medicine.
期刊最新文献
Autism, Electrical Status Epilepticus in Sleep, and a Likely Pathogenic SEMA6B Variant. Children's Understanding of Commonly Used Medical Terminology. Disparities in Survival Without Major Morbidity Among Very Low Birth Weight Infants in California. Method for Identification and Bacterial Count Quantification in a Case of Ureaplasma Meningitis. Disordered Eating Profiles in Adolescence to Early Adulthood and Future Cardiometabolic Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1