Implementation of Evidence-Based International Recommendations Reduces Postoperative Delirium Rate in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery or Interventions: A System-Based Quality Improvement Study.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-10-16 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.31083/j.rcm2510369
Simon Milz, Caroline Holaubek, Jan Siebel, Nikolai Hulde, Franziska Wefer, Andreas Fruend, Katharina Tigges-Limmer, Jan Gummert, Vera von Dossow
{"title":"Implementation of Evidence-Based International Recommendations Reduces Postoperative Delirium Rate in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery or Interventions: A System-Based Quality Improvement Study.","authors":"Simon Milz, Caroline Holaubek, Jan Siebel, Nikolai Hulde, Franziska Wefer, Andreas Fruend, Katharina Tigges-Limmer, Jan Gummert, Vera von Dossow","doi":"10.31083/j.rcm2510369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delirium is a frequent and serious complication of cardiac procedures that can lead to serious long-term health restrictions. As primary prevention is more effective in reducing rate of delirium than the therapy itself, this study aimed to investigate the effect of a multidisciplinary delirium prevention bundle on the postoperative delirium rate in patients undergoing cardiac procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this system-based quality improvement study, a four-component delirium prevention bundle was implemented in patients undergoing cardiac procedures at a single high-volume center. The program included preoperative delirium risk stratification, multidisciplinary education of consensus guidelines, written memory aids, and post-anesthetic visits with delirium screening until postoperative day three.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 234 patients were included and analyzed during the 6-month study period. The overall delirium incidence rate was 12.4%. After the first 3-month baseline implementation period, the delirium rate was 17.2%, compared with 7.6% (<i>p</i> = 0.026) after implementation of the delirium prevention bundle. Multivariate analysis revealed independent risk factors such as age [adjusted odds ratio (OR): 1.046; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.002-1.092; <i>p</i> = 0.042], double valve surgery [adjusted OR: 13.1; 95% CI: 3.240-52.974; <i>p</i> < 0.0001], and peripheral artery disease [adjusted OR: 8.131; 95% CI: 2.336-28.306; <i>p</i> < 0.001]. Hospital stay was significantly longer in patients with delirium [median 13 (12-19.5) versus 12 (11-14) days, <i>p</i> = 0.009].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This multidisciplinary system-based quality improvement study demonstrated a beneficial effect on the delirium rate after the implementation of a four-component delirium prevention bundle in patients undergoing cardiac surgery or intervention. Furthermore, multivariate analysis revealed important independent risk factors for delirium development. This might improve early risk stratification and strategies for this high-risk patient collective.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11522768/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2510369","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Delirium is a frequent and serious complication of cardiac procedures that can lead to serious long-term health restrictions. As primary prevention is more effective in reducing rate of delirium than the therapy itself, this study aimed to investigate the effect of a multidisciplinary delirium prevention bundle on the postoperative delirium rate in patients undergoing cardiac procedures.

Methods: In this system-based quality improvement study, a four-component delirium prevention bundle was implemented in patients undergoing cardiac procedures at a single high-volume center. The program included preoperative delirium risk stratification, multidisciplinary education of consensus guidelines, written memory aids, and post-anesthetic visits with delirium screening until postoperative day three.

Results: Overall, 234 patients were included and analyzed during the 6-month study period. The overall delirium incidence rate was 12.4%. After the first 3-month baseline implementation period, the delirium rate was 17.2%, compared with 7.6% (p = 0.026) after implementation of the delirium prevention bundle. Multivariate analysis revealed independent risk factors such as age [adjusted odds ratio (OR): 1.046; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.002-1.092; p = 0.042], double valve surgery [adjusted OR: 13.1; 95% CI: 3.240-52.974; p < 0.0001], and peripheral artery disease [adjusted OR: 8.131; 95% CI: 2.336-28.306; p < 0.001]. Hospital stay was significantly longer in patients with delirium [median 13 (12-19.5) versus 12 (11-14) days, p = 0.009].

Conclusions: This multidisciplinary system-based quality improvement study demonstrated a beneficial effect on the delirium rate after the implementation of a four-component delirium prevention bundle in patients undergoing cardiac surgery or intervention. Furthermore, multivariate analysis revealed important independent risk factors for delirium development. This might improve early risk stratification and strategies for this high-risk patient collective.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实施循证国际建议可降低心脏手术或介入治疗患者的术后谵妄率:基于系统的质量改进研究》。
背景:谵妄是心脏手术中一种常见的严重并发症,可导致严重的长期健康限制。由于一级预防比治疗本身更能有效降低谵妄发生率,本研究旨在探讨多学科谵妄预防捆绑疗法对心脏手术患者术后谵妄发生率的影响:在这项以系统为基础的质量改进研究中,一个高流量中心对接受心脏手术的患者实施了由四部分组成的谵妄预防捆绑计划。该计划包括术前谵妄风险分层、多学科共识指南教育、书面记忆辅助工具以及麻醉后访视和谵妄筛查,直至术后第三天:在为期 6 个月的研究期间,共纳入并分析了 234 名患者。总体谵妄发生率为 12.4%。在最初 3 个月的基线实施期后,谵妄发生率为 17.2%,而在实施谵妄预防捆绑包后,谵妄发生率为 7.6%(p = 0.026)。多变量分析显示了一些独立的风险因素,如年龄[调整后比值比(OR):1.046;95% 置信区间(CI):1.002-1.092;p = 0.042]、双瓣膜手术[调整后比值比(OR):13.1;95% 置信区间(CI):3.240-52.974;p < 0.0001]和外周动脉疾病[调整后比值比(OR):8.131;95% 置信区间(CI):2.336-28.306;p < 0.001]。谵妄患者的住院时间明显更长[中位数为13(12-19.5)天对12(11-14)天,p = 0.009]:这项以多学科系统为基础的质量改进研究表明,对接受心脏手术或介入治疗的患者实施由四部分组成的谵妄预防捆绑包后,对谵妄发生率产生了有益的影响。此外,多变量分析还揭示了谵妄发生的重要独立风险因素。这可能会改善这一高风险患者群体的早期风险分层和策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1