Outcome of Solid Organ Transplantation in Patients With Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Literature Review.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Transplant International Pub Date : 2024-10-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/ti.2024.11872
Ingeborg de Rover, Lara Orlandini, Sarwa Darwish Murad, Wojciech G Polak, Jane Hartley, Khalid Sharif, Dimitri Sneiders, Hermien Hartog
{"title":"Outcome of Solid Organ Transplantation in Patients With Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Literature Review.","authors":"Ingeborg de Rover, Lara Orlandini, Sarwa Darwish Murad, Wojciech G Polak, Jane Hartley, Khalid Sharif, Dimitri Sneiders, Hermien Hartog","doi":"10.3389/ti.2024.11872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Access to solid organ transplantation in patients with intellectual disability is associated with health inequities due to concerns about treatment adherence, survival rates, and post-transplant quality of life. This systematic literature review aims to compare outcomes after organ transplantation in patients with intellectual disability compared to patients without intellectual disability. Embase, Medline Ovid, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Trials, and Google Scholar databases were systematically searched for studies concerning pediatric or adult solid organ transplantation in recipients with a diagnosis of intellectual disability prior to transplantation. Primary outcomes were patient and graft survival rates. Secondary outcomes were acute rejection rate, adherence rates, and quality of life. Nine studies were included, describing kidney (n = 6), heart (n = 4) and liver (n = 1) transplantation. Reported graft survival rates were non-inferior or better compared to patients without intellectual disability, while patient survival was reportedly slightly lower in two studies reporting on kidney transplantation. Although current evidence has a potential selection bias based on including patients with a sufficient support network, intellectual disability alone should not be regarded a relative or absolute contra-indication for solid organ transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23343,"journal":{"name":"Transplant International","volume":"37 ","pages":"11872"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11524806/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2024.11872","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Access to solid organ transplantation in patients with intellectual disability is associated with health inequities due to concerns about treatment adherence, survival rates, and post-transplant quality of life. This systematic literature review aims to compare outcomes after organ transplantation in patients with intellectual disability compared to patients without intellectual disability. Embase, Medline Ovid, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Trials, and Google Scholar databases were systematically searched for studies concerning pediatric or adult solid organ transplantation in recipients with a diagnosis of intellectual disability prior to transplantation. Primary outcomes were patient and graft survival rates. Secondary outcomes were acute rejection rate, adherence rates, and quality of life. Nine studies were included, describing kidney (n = 6), heart (n = 4) and liver (n = 1) transplantation. Reported graft survival rates were non-inferior or better compared to patients without intellectual disability, while patient survival was reportedly slightly lower in two studies reporting on kidney transplantation. Although current evidence has a potential selection bias based on including patients with a sufficient support network, intellectual disability alone should not be regarded a relative or absolute contra-indication for solid organ transplantation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智障患者的实体器官移植结果:系统性文献综述
由于对治疗依从性、存活率和移植后生活质量的担忧,智障患者接受实体器官移植与健康不平等有关。本系统性文献综述旨在比较智障患者与非智障患者器官移植后的治疗效果。我们在 Embase、Medline Ovid、PsycINFO、Web of Science、Cochrane Central Register of Trials 和 Google Scholar 数据库中系统检索了有关小儿或成人实体器官移植的研究,这些研究的受者在移植前已被诊断为智障。主要结果为患者和移植物存活率。次要结果为急性排斥率、依从率和生活质量。共纳入九项研究,分别描述了肾移植(6 例)、心脏移植(4 例)和肝移植(1 例)。据报道,与无智力障碍的患者相比,移植物存活率不低于或高于无智力障碍的患者,但据报道,在两项肾移植研究中,患者的存活率略低于无智力障碍的患者。虽然目前的证据可能存在选择偏差,因为其中包括了有足够支持网络的患者,但智力残疾本身不应被视为实体器官移植的相对或绝对禁忌症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transplant International
Transplant International 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.50%
发文量
211
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to serve as a forum for the exchange of scientific information in the form of original and high quality papers in the field of transplantation. Clinical and experimental studies, as well as editorials, letters to the editors, and, occasionally, reviews on the biology, physiology, and immunology of transplantation of tissues and organs, are published. Publishing time for the latter is approximately six months, provided major revisions are not needed. The journal is published in yearly volumes, each volume containing twelve issues. Papers submitted to the journal are subject to peer review.
期刊最新文献
Burnout Among Physicians of Specialties Dedicated to Liver Transplantation. Normothermic Machine Perfusion Reconstitutes Porcine Kidney Tissue Metabolism But Induces an Inflammatory Response, Which Is Reduced by Complement C5 Inhibition. Angiotensin II Type-1 Receptor Antibody in Solid Organ Transplantation - Is It Time to Test? Allorecognition Unveiled: Integrating Recent Breakthroughs Into the Current Paradigm. The impact of the EVLP on the lung microbiome and its inflammatory reaction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1