Germline genetic testing for prostate cancer: Ordering trends in the era of expanded hereditary cancer screening recommendations.

Jacob L Roberts, Luke Luchen Wang, Brent Rose, Tyler M Seibert, Lisa Madlensky, Sarah M Nielsen, Amir Salmasi, A Karim Kader, Christopher J Kane, E David Crawford, Juan Javier-Desloges, Rana R McKay, Aditya Bagrodia
{"title":"Germline genetic testing for prostate cancer: Ordering trends in the era of expanded hereditary cancer screening recommendations.","authors":"Jacob L Roberts, Luke Luchen Wang, Brent Rose, Tyler M Seibert, Lisa Madlensky, Sarah M Nielsen, Amir Salmasi, A Karim Kader, Christopher J Kane, E David Crawford, Juan Javier-Desloges, Rana R McKay, Aditya Bagrodia","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.10.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The availability of targeted therapies for advanced prostate cancer led to the expansion of national guidelines recommending germline genetic testing. The aim of this study was to describe recent trends in germline test ordering patterns for patients with prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort analysis of patients with prostate cancer who underwent germline testing through a single commercial laboratory (Invitae Corporation) between 2015-2020 was performed. Ordering trends between provider medical specialties were compared. Our primary hypothesis was that the proportion of tests ordered by urologists would increase over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 17,256 prostate cancer patients underwent germline genetic testing; 14,400 patients had an ordering provider with an associated medical specialty and were included in the final comparison cohort. Total prostate cancer patients undergoing germline testing increased quarterly from 21 in Q2 of 2015 to 1,509 in Q3 of 2020. The proportion of tests ordered by urologists increased from 0% in Q2 2015 to 8.3% in Q3 2020 (P < 0.001). Compared to medical genetics, medical oncology, and other specialties, urology ordered more tests for patients under 70 years old (66% vs 51%-55%, P <0.004) and for patients who reported negative family history (25% vs 12%-20%, P = 0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As awareness and indications for germline testing continue to expand, aggregate ordering volume is increasing, and urologists are becoming more involved in facilitating testing. This highlights the continued importance of educating urologists on the indications for and implications of germline genetic testing, as well as providing tools to support implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.10.010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The availability of targeted therapies for advanced prostate cancer led to the expansion of national guidelines recommending germline genetic testing. The aim of this study was to describe recent trends in germline test ordering patterns for patients with prostate cancer.

Materials and methods: A retrospective cohort analysis of patients with prostate cancer who underwent germline testing through a single commercial laboratory (Invitae Corporation) between 2015-2020 was performed. Ordering trends between provider medical specialties were compared. Our primary hypothesis was that the proportion of tests ordered by urologists would increase over time.

Results: In total, 17,256 prostate cancer patients underwent germline genetic testing; 14,400 patients had an ordering provider with an associated medical specialty and were included in the final comparison cohort. Total prostate cancer patients undergoing germline testing increased quarterly from 21 in Q2 of 2015 to 1,509 in Q3 of 2020. The proportion of tests ordered by urologists increased from 0% in Q2 2015 to 8.3% in Q3 2020 (P < 0.001). Compared to medical genetics, medical oncology, and other specialties, urology ordered more tests for patients under 70 years old (66% vs 51%-55%, P <0.004) and for patients who reported negative family history (25% vs 12%-20%, P = 0.012).

Conclusions: As awareness and indications for germline testing continue to expand, aggregate ordering volume is increasing, and urologists are becoming more involved in facilitating testing. This highlights the continued importance of educating urologists on the indications for and implications of germline genetic testing, as well as providing tools to support implementation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前列腺癌基因检测:遗传性癌症筛查建议扩大后的订购趋势。
目的:随着晚期前列腺癌靶向疗法的出现,建议进行种系基因检测的国家指南也在不断扩大。本研究旨在描述前列腺癌患者基因检测订购模式的最新趋势:本研究对 2015-2020 年间通过一家商业实验室(Invitae 公司)接受种系检测的前列腺癌患者进行了回顾性队列分析。比较了不同医疗机构的订购趋势。我们的主要假设是,随着时间的推移,泌尿科医生订购检测的比例会增加:共有 17,256 名前列腺癌患者接受了种系遗传检测;14,400 名患者的下单医疗服务提供者具有相关医学专业,并被纳入最终比较队列。接受种系检测的前列腺癌患者总数从 2015 年第二季度的 21 人增加到 2020 年第三季度的 1,509 人。由泌尿科医生下达检测指令的比例从 2015 年第二季度的 0% 增加到 2020 年第三季度的 8.3%(P < 0.001)。与医学遗传学、医学肿瘤学和其他专科相比,泌尿科为 70 岁以下的患者订购了更多的检测项目(66% vs 51%-55%,P 结论):随着人们对种系检测的认识和适应症的不断扩大,总订购量也在不断增加,泌尿科医生也越来越多地参与到促进检测的工作中来。这凸显了教育泌尿科医生了解种系基因检测的适应症和意义以及提供支持实施的工具的持续重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Cover 2 - Masthead 2023 Star Reviewers for Urologic Oncology Cover 3 - Information for Authors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1