Bardia Hajikarimloo , Salem M. Tos , Mohammadamin Sabbagh Alvani , Mohammad Ali Rafiei , Diba Akbarzadeh , Mohammad ShahirEftekhar , Mohammadhosein Akhlaghpasand , Mohammad Amin Habibi
{"title":"Application of Artificial Intelligence in Prediction of Ki-67 Index in Meningiomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Bardia Hajikarimloo , Salem M. Tos , Mohammadamin Sabbagh Alvani , Mohammad Ali Rafiei , Diba Akbarzadeh , Mohammad ShahirEftekhar , Mohammadhosein Akhlaghpasand , Mohammad Amin Habibi","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Ki-67 index is a histopathological marker that has been reported to be a crucial factor in the biological behavior and prognosis of meningiomas. Several studies have developed artificial intelligence (AI) models to predict the Ki-67 based on radiomics. In this study, we aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of AI models that predicted the Ki-67 index in meningioma.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Literature records were retrieved on April 27, 2024, using the relevant key terms without filters in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. Records were screened according to the eligibility criteria, and the data from included studies were extracted. The quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. The meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and meta-regression were conducted using R software.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our study included 6 studies. The mean Ki-67 ranged from 2.7 ± 2.97 to 4.8 ± 40.3. Of 6 studies, 5 utilized a machine learning method. The most used AI method was the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. The area under the curve and accuracy ranged from 0.83 to 0.99 and 0.81 to 0.95, respectively. AI models demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 87.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 75.2%, 94.2%), a specificity of 86.9% (95% CI: 75.8%, 93.4%), and a diagnostic odds ratio of 40.02 (95% CI: 13.5, 156.4). The summary receiver operating characteristic curve indicated an area under the curve of 0.931 for the prediction of Ki-67 index status in intracranial meningiomas.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>AI models have demonstrated promising performance for predicting the Ki-67 index in meningiomas and can optimize the treatment strategy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":"193 ","pages":"Pages 226-235"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878875024017935","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The Ki-67 index is a histopathological marker that has been reported to be a crucial factor in the biological behavior and prognosis of meningiomas. Several studies have developed artificial intelligence (AI) models to predict the Ki-67 based on radiomics. In this study, we aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of AI models that predicted the Ki-67 index in meningioma.
Methods
Literature records were retrieved on April 27, 2024, using the relevant key terms without filters in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. Records were screened according to the eligibility criteria, and the data from included studies were extracted. The quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. The meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and meta-regression were conducted using R software.
Results
Our study included 6 studies. The mean Ki-67 ranged from 2.7 ± 2.97 to 4.8 ± 40.3. Of 6 studies, 5 utilized a machine learning method. The most used AI method was the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. The area under the curve and accuracy ranged from 0.83 to 0.99 and 0.81 to 0.95, respectively. AI models demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 87.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 75.2%, 94.2%), a specificity of 86.9% (95% CI: 75.8%, 93.4%), and a diagnostic odds ratio of 40.02 (95% CI: 13.5, 156.4). The summary receiver operating characteristic curve indicated an area under the curve of 0.931 for the prediction of Ki-67 index status in intracranial meningiomas.
Conclusions
AI models have demonstrated promising performance for predicting the Ki-67 index in meningiomas and can optimize the treatment strategy.
期刊介绍:
World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The journal''s mission is to:
-To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care.
-To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide.
-To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients.
Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS