Application of Artificial Intelligence in Prediction of Ki-67 Index in Meningiomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY World neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.089
Bardia Hajikarimloo , Salem M. Tos , Mohammadamin Sabbagh Alvani , Mohammad Ali Rafiei , Diba Akbarzadeh , Mohammad ShahirEftekhar , Mohammadhosein Akhlaghpasand , Mohammad Amin Habibi
{"title":"Application of Artificial Intelligence in Prediction of Ki-67 Index in Meningiomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Bardia Hajikarimloo ,&nbsp;Salem M. Tos ,&nbsp;Mohammadamin Sabbagh Alvani ,&nbsp;Mohammad Ali Rafiei ,&nbsp;Diba Akbarzadeh ,&nbsp;Mohammad ShahirEftekhar ,&nbsp;Mohammadhosein Akhlaghpasand ,&nbsp;Mohammad Amin Habibi","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Ki-67 index is a histopathological marker that has been reported to be a crucial factor in the biological behavior and prognosis of meningiomas. Several studies have developed artificial intelligence (AI) models to predict the Ki-67 based on radiomics. In this study, we aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of AI models that predicted the Ki-67 index in meningioma.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Literature records were retrieved on April 27, 2024, using the relevant key terms without filters in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. Records were screened according to the eligibility criteria, and the data from included studies were extracted. The quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. The meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and meta-regression were conducted using R software.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our study included 6 studies. The mean Ki-67 ranged from 2.7 ± 2.97 to 4.8 ± 40.3. Of 6 studies, 5 utilized a machine learning method. The most used AI method was the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. The area under the curve and accuracy ranged from 0.83 to 0.99 and 0.81 to 0.95, respectively. AI models demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 87.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 75.2%, 94.2%), a specificity of 86.9% (95% CI: 75.8%, 93.4%), and a diagnostic odds ratio of 40.02 (95% CI: 13.5, 156.4). The summary receiver operating characteristic curve indicated an area under the curve of 0.931 for the prediction of Ki-67 index status in intracranial meningiomas.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>AI models have demonstrated promising performance for predicting the Ki-67 index in meningiomas and can optimize the treatment strategy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":"193 ","pages":"Pages 226-235"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878875024017935","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The Ki-67 index is a histopathological marker that has been reported to be a crucial factor in the biological behavior and prognosis of meningiomas. Several studies have developed artificial intelligence (AI) models to predict the Ki-67 based on radiomics. In this study, we aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of AI models that predicted the Ki-67 index in meningioma.

Methods

Literature records were retrieved on April 27, 2024, using the relevant key terms without filters in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. Records were screened according to the eligibility criteria, and the data from included studies were extracted. The quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. The meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and meta-regression were conducted using R software.

Results

Our study included 6 studies. The mean Ki-67 ranged from 2.7 ± 2.97 to 4.8 ± 40.3. Of 6 studies, 5 utilized a machine learning method. The most used AI method was the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. The area under the curve and accuracy ranged from 0.83 to 0.99 and 0.81 to 0.95, respectively. AI models demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 87.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 75.2%, 94.2%), a specificity of 86.9% (95% CI: 75.8%, 93.4%), and a diagnostic odds ratio of 40.02 (95% CI: 13.5, 156.4). The summary receiver operating characteristic curve indicated an area under the curve of 0.931 for the prediction of Ki-67 index status in intracranial meningiomas.

Conclusions

AI models have demonstrated promising performance for predicting the Ki-67 index in meningiomas and can optimize the treatment strategy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能在脑膜瘤 Ki-67 指数预测中的应用:系统回顾与元分析
背景:Ki-67指数是一种组织病理学标志物,据报道是脑膜瘤生物学行为和预后的关键因素。一些研究开发了基于放射组学的人工智能(AI)模型来预测 Ki-67。本研究旨在对预测脑膜瘤Ki-67指数的人工智能模型进行系统回顾和荟萃分析:我们于 2024 年 4 月 27 日在 PubMed、Embase、Scopus 和 Web of Science 中使用相关关键词检索了文献记录。根据资格标准对记录进行筛选,并提取纳入研究的数据。采用 QUADAS-2 工具进行质量评估。使用 R 软件进行荟萃分析、敏感性分析和荟萃回归:我们的研究包括六项研究。平均 Ki-67 在 2.7 ± 2.97 到 4.8 ± 40.3 之间。六项研究中,五项采用了 ML 方法。使用最多的人工智能方法是最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)。AUC 和 ACC 分别为 0.83 至 0.99 和 0.81 至 0.95。AI 模型的集合灵敏度为 87.5%(95% CI:75.2%,94.2%),特异度为 86.9%(95% CI:75.8%,93.4%),诊断几率比(DOR)为 40.02(95% CI:13.5,156.4)。接受者操作特征 SROC 曲线显示,预测颅内脑膜瘤 Ki-67 指数状态的 AUC 为 0.931:结论:人工智能模型在预测脑膜瘤的 Ki-67 指数方面表现良好,可以优化治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World neurosurgery
World neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
1765
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal''s mission is to: -To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care. -To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide. -To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients. Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS
期刊最新文献
Early and Long-Term Changes in Adjacent Vertebral Body Bone Mineral Density Determined by DEXA After Posterolateral Fusion with Transpedicular Screw Fixation in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Study Evaluation of Three Atlas Lateral Mass Screw Trajectories: A Computed Tomography-Based Analysis of Anatomical Parameters Hemilaminectomy as an Approach for Intradural Extramedullary Tumor Removal Comparative Analysis of Repeat Cranial Imaging in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Evaluating Risk Factors, Costs, and Radiation Exposure Between 2017 and 2023 Safety and Feasibility of Intradiscal Autologous Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate at the Time of Lumbar Microdiscectomy: A Prospective Pilot Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1