Cristina A Peláez-Sanchez, Marcos Pajarón-Guerrero, Angelina Rodriguez-Caballero, Juan Carlos Dueñas, Ana B Piriz, Rubén Martín-Láez, Isabel Sampedro, Carlos Velásquez
{"title":"Cost Analysis of Oncological Outpatient Neurosurgery Under General Anesthesia with Hospital-At-Home-Based Postoperative Care.","authors":"Cristina A Peláez-Sanchez, Marcos Pajarón-Guerrero, Angelina Rodriguez-Caballero, Juan Carlos Dueñas, Ana B Piriz, Rubén Martín-Láez, Isabel Sampedro, Carlos Velásquez","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluates the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of an oncological outpatient neurosurgery protocol using enhanced recovery after surgery principles in a European healthcare setting. Additionally, it assesses the impact of incorporating hospital at home (HaH) for perioperative follow-up on program efficiency and costs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed a case cohort of patients who underwent oncological outpatient neurosurgery with HaH-based postoperative follow-up for tumor removal or biopsy at a tertiary care center since 2019. A control cohort treated under standard inpatient care was also examined. Costs associated with surgery and postoperative care were meticulously calculated for both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The case (n = 17) and control (n = 38) cohorts had comparable demographics and clinical profiles. Surgical costs, including operating room, anesthesia, and surgeon fees, were similar across groups. However, postoperative monitoring was significantly shorter for the outpatient cohort, leading to reduced observation costs (P < 0.001). While the duration of follow-up care was similar, outpatient follow-up via HaH was more cost-effective, reducing overall surgery costs by approximately €2958 per patient (P < 0.001) compared to inpatient care. No significant differences were observed in costs related to treatment, radiology, or lab tests between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Outpatient neurosurgery with HaH follow-up offers substantial cost savings without compromising care quality in a public health setting. Inpatient care's higher costs are largely due to bed utilization, while the integration of HaH does not add significant costs, making it a viable alternative for postoperative management.</p>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1002-1007"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.093","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study evaluates the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of an oncological outpatient neurosurgery protocol using enhanced recovery after surgery principles in a European healthcare setting. Additionally, it assesses the impact of incorporating hospital at home (HaH) for perioperative follow-up on program efficiency and costs.
Methods: We analyzed a case cohort of patients who underwent oncological outpatient neurosurgery with HaH-based postoperative follow-up for tumor removal or biopsy at a tertiary care center since 2019. A control cohort treated under standard inpatient care was also examined. Costs associated with surgery and postoperative care were meticulously calculated for both groups.
Results: The case (n = 17) and control (n = 38) cohorts had comparable demographics and clinical profiles. Surgical costs, including operating room, anesthesia, and surgeon fees, were similar across groups. However, postoperative monitoring was significantly shorter for the outpatient cohort, leading to reduced observation costs (P < 0.001). While the duration of follow-up care was similar, outpatient follow-up via HaH was more cost-effective, reducing overall surgery costs by approximately €2958 per patient (P < 0.001) compared to inpatient care. No significant differences were observed in costs related to treatment, radiology, or lab tests between groups.
Conclusions: Outpatient neurosurgery with HaH follow-up offers substantial cost savings without compromising care quality in a public health setting. Inpatient care's higher costs are largely due to bed utilization, while the integration of HaH does not add significant costs, making it a viable alternative for postoperative management.
期刊介绍:
World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The journal''s mission is to:
-To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care.
-To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide.
-To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients.
Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS