Unsuspected Positive Intra-Operative Cultures in Aseptic Revision Hip Arthroplasty: Prevalence, Management, and Infection-Free Survivorship

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Arthroplasty Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2024.10.102
Justin Leal, Christine J. Wu MD, Thorsten M. Seyler MD, PhD, William A. Jiranek MD, Samuel S. Wellman MD, Michael P. Bolognesi MD, Sean P. Ryan MD
{"title":"Unsuspected Positive Intra-Operative Cultures in Aseptic Revision Hip Arthroplasty: Prevalence, Management, and Infection-Free Survivorship","authors":"Justin Leal,&nbsp;Christine J. Wu MD,&nbsp;Thorsten M. Seyler MD, PhD,&nbsp;William A. Jiranek MD,&nbsp;Samuel S. Wellman MD,&nbsp;Michael P. Bolognesi MD,&nbsp;Sean P. Ryan MD","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.10.102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study aimed to describe the management and outcomes of aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty (arTHA) with unsuspected intraoperative positive cultures (UPCs) compared to those with sterile cultures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A single tertiary center’s institutional database was retrospectively reviewed for arTHA from January 2013 to October 2023. Preoperative Musculoskeletal Infection Society scores were assigned to patients based on available infectious workup, and those who met the criteria for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), received antibiotic spacers, or had less than 1-year follow-up were excluded. Patients were grouped and compared according to intraoperative culture results as follows: sterile cultures, one unexpected positive culture with a new organism, one UPC with the same organism as prior PJI, ≥ two UPCs with different organisms, and ≥ 2 UPCs with the same organism.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was a total of 604 arTHAs included in this study, of which 0.8% [5 of 604] had ≥ two UPCs with different organisms, 1.5% [9 of 604] had ≥ two UPCs with the same organism, 9.8% [59 of 604] had one UPC with a new organism, 0.2% [one of 604] had one UPC with an organism from prior PJI, and 87.7% [530 of 604] of patients had sterile cultures. When comparing 5-year infection-free survival between patients who had one UPC with a new organism and sterile cultures, there was no difference (<em>P</em> = 0.40); however, patients who had ≥ two UPCs with different organisms (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), patients who had ≥ two UPCs with the same organism (<em>P</em> = 0.001), and patients who had one UPC of an organism from prior PJI (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) had statistically worse infection-free survival compared to patients with sterile cultures.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Infection-free survival at five years was similar between patients who had one UPC with a new organism and those who had sterile cultures; however, ≥ two UPCs and a history of PJI are both significant risk factors for rerevision for infection after arTHA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":"40 5","pages":"Pages 1326-1334.e3"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883540324011422","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to describe the management and outcomes of aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty (arTHA) with unsuspected intraoperative positive cultures (UPCs) compared to those with sterile cultures.

Methods

A single tertiary center’s institutional database was retrospectively reviewed for arTHA from January 2013 to October 2023. Preoperative Musculoskeletal Infection Society scores were assigned to patients based on available infectious workup, and those who met the criteria for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), received antibiotic spacers, or had less than 1-year follow-up were excluded. Patients were grouped and compared according to intraoperative culture results as follows: sterile cultures, one unexpected positive culture with a new organism, one UPC with the same organism as prior PJI, ≥ two UPCs with different organisms, and ≥ 2 UPCs with the same organism.

Results

There was a total of 604 arTHAs included in this study, of which 0.8% [5 of 604] had ≥ two UPCs with different organisms, 1.5% [9 of 604] had ≥ two UPCs with the same organism, 9.8% [59 of 604] had one UPC with a new organism, 0.2% [one of 604] had one UPC with an organism from prior PJI, and 87.7% [530 of 604] of patients had sterile cultures. When comparing 5-year infection-free survival between patients who had one UPC with a new organism and sterile cultures, there was no difference (P = 0.40); however, patients who had ≥ two UPCs with different organisms (P < 0.001), patients who had ≥ two UPCs with the same organism (P = 0.001), and patients who had one UPC of an organism from prior PJI (P < 0.001) had statistically worse infection-free survival compared to patients with sterile cultures.

Conclusions

Infection-free survival at five years was similar between patients who had one UPC with a new organism and those who had sterile cultures; however, ≥ two UPCs and a history of PJI are both significant risk factors for rerevision for infection after arTHA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无菌翻修髋关节置换术中未发现的术中培养阳性结果:无菌翻修髋关节置换术中的术中培养阳性:发生率、处理和无感染存活率。
背景:本研究旨在描述无菌翻修全髋关节置换术(arTHA)术中培养阳性(UPCs)与无菌培养阳性患者的管理和预后比较:方法: 对一家三级医疗中心 2013 年 1 月至 2023 年 10 月期间的 arTHA 数据库进行回顾性分析。根据现有的感染检查结果对患者进行术前肌肉骨骼感染协会(MSIS)评分,并排除符合假体周围感染(PJI)标准、接受抗生素垫片治疗或随访不足1年的患者。根据术中培养结果对患者进行分组和比较:无菌培养、一个UPC带有新的病原体、一个UPC带有与之前PJI相同的病原体、≥两个UPC带有不同的病原体、≥两个UPC带有相同的病原体:本研究共纳入了604例 arTHA,其中0.8%[604例中的5例]有≥2例UPC带有不同的病原体,1.5%[604例中的9例]有≥2例UPC带有相同的病原体,9.8%[604例中的59例]有1例UPC带有新的病原体,0.2%[604例中的1例]有1例UPC带有既往PJI的病原体,87.7%[604例中的530例]患者的培养结果为无菌。在比较有一个带有新病原体的 UPC 的患者和无菌培养的患者的 5 年无感染生存率时,两者之间没有差异(P = 0.40);但是,与无菌培养的患者相比,有≥两个带有不同病原体的 UPC 的患者(P < 0.001)、有≥两个带有相同病原体的 UPC 的患者(P = 0.001)和有一个带有既往 PJI 病原体的 UPC 的患者(P < 0.001)的无感染生存率更低:结论:有一次UPC感染新病原体的患者与无菌培养的患者五年后的无感染生存率相似;但是,≥两次UPC和有PJI病史都是arTHA术后再次感染的重要风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arthroplasty
Journal of Arthroplasty 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
734
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.
期刊最新文献
Nontraumatic Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: An International Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline. Quality of Life and Outcomes After Treatment Failure for Recurrent Periprosthetic Joint Infection of Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Retrospective Comparison of Transfemoral Amputation, Arthrodesis, and Permanent Spacer Is Semaglutide a Safer Weight-Management Option Than Bariatric Surgery for Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA)? Systematic Review of Metal Concentrations in Blood, Serum, and Tissue Following Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Surgical Approach Does Not Influence Instability Risk in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With Monobloc Dual Mobility Cup
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1