The association of plasma homocysteine levels with short-term mortality in sepsis patients: A meta-analysis.

0 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Biomolecules & biomedicine Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.17305/bb.2024.11259
Xinxing Lu, Xueyan Yuan, Yali Chao, Xiao Wu, Airan Liu
{"title":"The association of plasma homocysteine levels with short-term mortality in sepsis patients: A meta-analysis.","authors":"Xinxing Lu, Xueyan Yuan, Yali Chao, Xiao Wu, Airan Liu","doi":"10.17305/bb.2024.11259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The association between plasma homocysteine (Hcy) levels and short-term mortality in sepsis patients remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to clarify this potential relationship. Following PRISMA 2020 and Cochrane Handbook guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive literature search in the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases up to June 24, 2024. We included cohort studies that assessed the association between plasma Hcy levels and all-cause mortality in adult sepsis patients. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model to account for potential heterogeneity. Nine cohort studies involving 771 sepsis patients were included. Overall, no significant difference in plasma Hcy levels was observed between survivors and non-survivors (SMD: -0.23, 95% CI: -0.84 to 0.37, P = 0.45), with substantial heterogeneity (I² = 86%). Subgroup analysis revealed lower plasma Hcy levels among survivors in Chinese patients (SMD: -1.56, 95% CI: -1.98 to -1.13, P < 0.001) but not in non-Asian patients. Plasma Hcy levels were not significantly associated with all-cause mortality (OR per 1-unit increment: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.95 to 1.11, P = 0.51), with notable heterogeneity (I² = 72%). However, a significant association was found in Chinese patients (OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.15, P = 0.003), but not in non-Asian patients. In conclusion, plasma Hcy levels were not generally associated with short-term mortality in sepsis patients. However, significant associations were observed in Chinese patients, suggesting potential ethnic differences that warrant further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72398,"journal":{"name":"Biomolecules & biomedicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomolecules & biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17305/bb.2024.11259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The association between plasma homocysteine (Hcy) levels and short-term mortality in sepsis patients remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to clarify this potential relationship. Following PRISMA 2020 and Cochrane Handbook guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive literature search in the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases up to June 24, 2024. We included cohort studies that assessed the association between plasma Hcy levels and all-cause mortality in adult sepsis patients. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model to account for potential heterogeneity. Nine cohort studies involving 771 sepsis patients were included. Overall, no significant difference in plasma Hcy levels was observed between survivors and non-survivors (SMD: -0.23, 95% CI: -0.84 to 0.37, P = 0.45), with substantial heterogeneity (I² = 86%). Subgroup analysis revealed lower plasma Hcy levels among survivors in Chinese patients (SMD: -1.56, 95% CI: -1.98 to -1.13, P < 0.001) but not in non-Asian patients. Plasma Hcy levels were not significantly associated with all-cause mortality (OR per 1-unit increment: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.95 to 1.11, P = 0.51), with notable heterogeneity (I² = 72%). However, a significant association was found in Chinese patients (OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.15, P = 0.003), but not in non-Asian patients. In conclusion, plasma Hcy levels were not generally associated with short-term mortality in sepsis patients. However, significant associations were observed in Chinese patients, suggesting potential ethnic differences that warrant further investigation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血浆同型半胱氨酸水平与败血症患者短期死亡率的关系:荟萃分析
脓毒症患者血浆同型半胱氨酸(Hcy)水平与短期死亡率之间的关系仍不明确。本荟萃分析旨在澄清这一潜在关系。根据 PRISMA 2020 和 Cochrane 手册指南,我们在 PubMed、Embase 和 Web of Science 数据库中对截至 2024 年 6 月 24 日的文献进行了全面检索。我们纳入了评估成人败血症患者血浆 Hcy 水平与全因死亡率之间关系的队列研究。我们使用随机效应模型计算了标准化均值差异(SMD)和带有 95% 置信区间(CI)的几率比(OR),以考虑潜在的异质性。共纳入了九项队列研究,涉及 771 名败血症患者。总体而言,幸存者和非幸存者的血浆 Hcy 水平无明显差异(SMD:-0.23,95% CI:-0.84 至 0.37,P = 0.45),异质性很大(I² = 86%)。亚组分析显示,中国患者存活者的血浆Hcy水平较低(SMD:-1.56,95% CI:-1.98至-1.13,P<0.001),而非亚洲患者的血浆Hcy水平较低。血浆 Hcy 水平与全因死亡率无显著相关性(每增加 1 个单位的 OR:1.03,95% CI:0.95 至 1.11,P = 0.51),异质性明显(I² = 72%)。然而,在中国患者中发现了明显的相关性(OR:1.09,95% CI:1.03 至 1.15,P = 0.003),而在非亚洲患者中则没有发现。总之,血浆 Hcy 水平一般与败血症患者的短期死亡率无关。然而,在中国患者中观察到了明显的相关性,这表明潜在的种族差异值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Therapeutic effects of chlorogenic acid on allergic rhinitis through TLR4/MAPK/NF-κB pathway modulation. Silencing FOXA1 suppresses inflammation caused by LPS and promotes osteogenic differentiation of periodontal ligament stem cells through the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB pathway. Systemic immune-inflammation index and the short-term mortality of patients with sepsis: A meta-analysis. hUC-MSC extracellular vesicles protect against hypoxic-ischemic brain injury by promoting NLRP3 ubiquitination. N6-methyladenosine methylation regulators can serve as potential biomarkers for endometriosis related infertility.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1