Participatory logic model for a precision child and youth mental health start-up: scoping review, case study, and lessons learned.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Frontiers in health services Pub Date : 2024-10-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frhs.2024.1405426
Kathleen Pajer, Christina Honeywell, Heather Howley, Nicole Sheridan, Will Affleck, Ivan Terekhov, Dhenuka Radhakrishnan
{"title":"Participatory logic model for a precision child and youth mental health start-up: scoping review, case study, and lessons learned.","authors":"Kathleen Pajer, Christina Honeywell, Heather Howley, Nicole Sheridan, Will Affleck, Ivan Terekhov, Dhenuka Radhakrishnan","doi":"10.3389/frhs.2024.1405426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The precision child and youth mental health (PCYMH) paradigm has great potential to transform CYMH care and research, but there are numerous concerns about feasibility, sustainablity, and equity. Implementation science and evaluation methodology, particularly participatory logic models created with stakeholders, may help catalyze PCYMH-driven system transformation. This paper aims to: (1) report results of a PCYMH logic model scoping review; (2) present a case study illustrating creation of a participatory logic model for a PCYMH start-up; and (3) share the final model plus lessons learned.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong><i>Phase 1: Preparation for the logic model</i> comprised several steps to develop a preliminary draft: scoping review of PCYMH logic models; two literature reviews (PCYMH and implementation science research); an environmental scan of our organization's PCYMH research; a gap analysis of our technological capability to support PCYMH research; and 57 stakeholder interviews assessing PCYMH perspectives and readiness. <i>Phase 2: Participatory creation of the logic model</i> integrated Phase 1 information into a draft from which the final logic model was completed through iterative stakeholder co-creation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><i>Phase 1</i>: The scoping review identified 0 documents. The PCYMH literature review informed our Problem and Impact Statements. Reviewing implementation and evaluation literature resulted in selection of the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) and Behavior Change Wheel (BCW) frameworks to guide model development. Only 1.2% (5/414) of the organization's research projects involved PCYMH. Three technological infrastructure gaps were identified as barriers to developing PCYMH research. Stakeholder readiness interviews identified three themes that were incorporated into the draft. <i>Phase 2</i>: Eight co-creation cycles with 36 stakeholders representing 13 groups and a consensus decision-making process were used to produce the final participatory logic model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study to report the development of a participatory logic model for a PCYMH program, detailing involvement of stakeholders from initial planning stages to the final consensus-based product. We learned that creating a participatory logic model is time- and labour-intensive and requires a multi-disciplinary team, but the process produced stakeholder-program relationships that enabled us to quickly build and implement the PCYMH start-up. Our processes and final model can inform similar efforts at other sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":73088,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health services","volume":"4 ","pages":"1405426"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11524936/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2024.1405426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The precision child and youth mental health (PCYMH) paradigm has great potential to transform CYMH care and research, but there are numerous concerns about feasibility, sustainablity, and equity. Implementation science and evaluation methodology, particularly participatory logic models created with stakeholders, may help catalyze PCYMH-driven system transformation. This paper aims to: (1) report results of a PCYMH logic model scoping review; (2) present a case study illustrating creation of a participatory logic model for a PCYMH start-up; and (3) share the final model plus lessons learned.

Methods: Phase 1: Preparation for the logic model comprised several steps to develop a preliminary draft: scoping review of PCYMH logic models; two literature reviews (PCYMH and implementation science research); an environmental scan of our organization's PCYMH research; a gap analysis of our technological capability to support PCYMH research; and 57 stakeholder interviews assessing PCYMH perspectives and readiness. Phase 2: Participatory creation of the logic model integrated Phase 1 information into a draft from which the final logic model was completed through iterative stakeholder co-creation.

Results: Phase 1: The scoping review identified 0 documents. The PCYMH literature review informed our Problem and Impact Statements. Reviewing implementation and evaluation literature resulted in selection of the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) and Behavior Change Wheel (BCW) frameworks to guide model development. Only 1.2% (5/414) of the organization's research projects involved PCYMH. Three technological infrastructure gaps were identified as barriers to developing PCYMH research. Stakeholder readiness interviews identified three themes that were incorporated into the draft. Phase 2: Eight co-creation cycles with 36 stakeholders representing 13 groups and a consensus decision-making process were used to produce the final participatory logic model.

Conclusions: This is the first study to report the development of a participatory logic model for a PCYMH program, detailing involvement of stakeholders from initial planning stages to the final consensus-based product. We learned that creating a participatory logic model is time- and labour-intensive and requires a multi-disciplinary team, but the process produced stakeholder-program relationships that enabled us to quickly build and implement the PCYMH start-up. Our processes and final model can inform similar efforts at other sites.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童和青少年心理健康精准启动的参与式逻辑模型:范围审查、案例研究和经验教训。
背景:精准儿童青少年心理健康(PCYMH)模式在改变儿童青少年心理健康护理和研究方面具有巨大潜力,但在可行性、可持续性和公平性方面存在诸多问题。实施科学和评估方法,尤其是与利益相关者共同创建的参与式逻辑模型,可能有助于推动由 PCYMH 驱动的系统转型。本文旨在:(1) 报告 PCYMH 逻辑模型范围审查的结果;(2) 介绍一个案例研究,说明如何为 PCYMH 启动创建参与式逻辑模型;(3) 分享最终模型及经验教训:第 1 阶段:逻辑模型的准备工作包括几个步骤,以编写初稿:对 PCYMH 逻辑模型进行范围审查;两份文献审查(PCYMH 和实施科学研究);对我们组织的 PCYMH 研究进行环境扫描;对我们支持 PCYMH 研究的技术能力进行差距分析;对 57 个利益相关者进行访谈,评估 PCYMH 的观点和准备情况。第 2 阶段:参与式逻辑模型创建将第 1 阶段的信息整合到草案中,在此基础上通过利益相关者的反复共同创建完成最终逻辑模型:第 1 阶段:范围审查确定了 0 份文件。PCYMH 文献审查为我们的 "问题和影响陈述 "提供了信息。通过审查实施和评估文献,我们选择了 "覆盖、效果、采纳、实施、维持"(RE-AIM)和 "行为改变轮"(BCW)框架来指导模型的开发。该组织的研究项目中只有 1.2%(5/414)涉及 PCYMH。三项技术基础设施差距被认为是开展 PCYMH 研究的障碍。利益相关者准备情况访谈确定了三个主题,并将其纳入草案。第 2 阶段:与代表 13 个团体的 36 名利益相关者进行了八次共同创造循环,并采用了协商一致的决策程序,以形成最终的参与式逻辑模型:本研究首次报告了 PCYMH 计划参与式逻辑模型的开发情况,详细介绍了利益相关者从最初规划阶段到最终达成共识的参与情况。我们了解到,创建参与式逻辑模型需要耗费大量的时间和精力,而且需要一个多学科团队,但这一过程产生了利益相关者与项目的关系,使我们能够迅速建立并实施 PCYMH 启动项目。我们的过程和最终模型可以为其他地点的类似工作提供借鉴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementation of a mobile prosthetic and orthotic care program in the VA; a qualitative study of implementation challenges and associated strategies for improvement. Creating demand for unmet needs: Agile Storytelling. Editorial: Digital health applications: acceptance, benefit assessment, and costs from the perspective of patients and medical professionals. Reported roles of care partners in a specialized weaning centre-perspectives of patients, care partners, and health care providers. Longitudinal analysis of culture of patient safety survey results in surgical departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1