The Optimal Entry Point and Trajectory for Pedicle Screws to Avoid Superior Facet Joint Violation and Pedicle Penetration.

IF 1 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Cureus Pub Date : 2024-10-30 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.72719
Hüseyin Doğu
{"title":"The Optimal Entry Point and Trajectory for Pedicle Screws to Avoid Superior Facet Joint Violation and Pedicle Penetration.","authors":"Hüseyin Doğu","doi":"10.7759/cureus.72719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Accuracy is crucial in surgeries involving pedicle screws. This study aimed to determine the optimal screw entry points and trajectory angles for the pedicle screw technique used in the surgical treatment of lumbar instability. Methods To achieve this goal, a comparison was made between the screw entry points and trajectories determined using the commonly used intersection technique and those created in a three-dimensional (3D) simulation environment. Thirty-two cases of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis, selected from surgeries between 2018 and 2023, were included. Preoperative lumbar computed tomography (CT) images were converted into 3D models, and simulations for pedicle screw placement were conducted. Results Using the intersection technique, upper facet damage was noted in 31.3% of L1, 37.5% of L2, 6.3% of L3, and 31.3% of L5 segments. Adjustments to entry points and angles in the 3D environment were made to determine optimal trajectories. The revised screw angles showed statistically significant improvements at L1, L2, and L5 segments compared to the intersection technique. Conclusions The intersection technique does not appear safe in preserving the superior facet joint. A more lateral and caudal pedicle entry should be preferred in the upper segments, and at L5, a more lateral pedicle entry should be used. Consequently, the screw angles should be adjusted accordingly.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11527514/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.72719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Accuracy is crucial in surgeries involving pedicle screws. This study aimed to determine the optimal screw entry points and trajectory angles for the pedicle screw technique used in the surgical treatment of lumbar instability. Methods To achieve this goal, a comparison was made between the screw entry points and trajectories determined using the commonly used intersection technique and those created in a three-dimensional (3D) simulation environment. Thirty-two cases of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis, selected from surgeries between 2018 and 2023, were included. Preoperative lumbar computed tomography (CT) images were converted into 3D models, and simulations for pedicle screw placement were conducted. Results Using the intersection technique, upper facet damage was noted in 31.3% of L1, 37.5% of L2, 6.3% of L3, and 31.3% of L5 segments. Adjustments to entry points and angles in the 3D environment were made to determine optimal trajectories. The revised screw angles showed statistically significant improvements at L1, L2, and L5 segments compared to the intersection technique. Conclusions The intersection technique does not appear safe in preserving the superior facet joint. A more lateral and caudal pedicle entry should be preferred in the upper segments, and at L5, a more lateral pedicle entry should be used. Consequently, the screw angles should be adjusted accordingly.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
椎弓根螺钉的最佳进入点和轨迹,以避免侵犯上面部关节和穿透椎弓根。
背景 在涉及椎弓根螺钉的手术中,精确性至关重要。本研究旨在确定用于腰椎不稳手术治疗的椎弓根螺钉技术的最佳螺钉进入点和轨迹角度。方法 为了实现这一目标,研究人员对使用常用交叉技术确定的螺钉进入点和轨迹与在三维(3D)模拟环境中创建的螺钉进入点和轨迹进行了比较。32例腰椎退行性滑脱病例选自2018年至2023年间的手术。术前腰椎计算机断层扫描(CT)图像被转换成三维模型,并进行了椎弓根螺钉置入模拟。结果 使用交叉技术,发现31.3%的L1、37.5%的L2、6.3%的L3和31.3%的L5节段存在上部切面损伤。对三维环境中的进入点和角度进行了调整,以确定最佳轨迹。与交叉技术相比,修改后的螺钉角度在 L1、L2 和 L5 节段有显著改善。结论 交叉技术在保留上椎面关节方面似乎并不安全。在上部节段,应选择更外侧和尾部的椎弓根入口,而在 L5 节段,应使用更外侧的椎弓根入口。因此,螺钉角度也应相应调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Current Role of Imaging in the Diagnosis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Detection of Its Complications: A Systematic Review. Assessment of Optimal Treatment Strategies and Their Outcomes in T3N1 Rectal Cancers. Effective Pain Management of Postherpetic Neuralgia Using a Combination of Analgesics and Conservative Measures. Evaluation of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes as Predictors of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Breast Cancer. Exacerbation of Hyperbilirubinemia by Falciparum Malaria in a Patient With Coexisting Gilbert's Syndrome and Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1