An exploratory empirical eye-tracker study of visualization techniques for coverage of combinatorial interaction testing in software product lines

IF 3.7 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Journal of Systems and Software Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2024.112261
Kambiz Nezami Balouchi , Julien Mercier , Roberto E. Lopez-Herrejon
{"title":"An exploratory empirical eye-tracker study of visualization techniques for coverage of combinatorial interaction testing in software product lines","authors":"Kambiz Nezami Balouchi ,&nbsp;Julien Mercier ,&nbsp;Roberto E. Lopez-Herrejon","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2024.112261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Software Product Lines (SPLs) typically provide a large number of configurations to cater to a set of diverse requirements of specific markets. This large number of configurations renders unfeasible to test them all individually. Instead, Combinatorial Interaction Testing (CIT) computes a representative sample according to criteria of the interactions of features in the configurations. We performed an empirical study using eye-tracker technologies to analyze the effectiveness of two basic visualization techniques at conveying test coverage information of ten case studies of varying complexity. Our evaluation considered response accuracy, time-on-task, metacognitive monitoring, and visual attention. The study revealed clear advantages of a visualization technique over the other in three evaluation aspects, with a reverse effect depending on the strength of the coverage and distinct areas of visual attention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Systems and Software","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 112261"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Systems and Software","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121224003054","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Software Product Lines (SPLs) typically provide a large number of configurations to cater to a set of diverse requirements of specific markets. This large number of configurations renders unfeasible to test them all individually. Instead, Combinatorial Interaction Testing (CIT) computes a representative sample according to criteria of the interactions of features in the configurations. We performed an empirical study using eye-tracker technologies to analyze the effectiveness of two basic visualization techniques at conveying test coverage information of ten case studies of varying complexity. Our evaluation considered response accuracy, time-on-task, metacognitive monitoring, and visual attention. The study revealed clear advantages of a visualization technique over the other in three evaluation aspects, with a reverse effect depending on the strength of the coverage and distinct areas of visual attention.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对软件产品生产线组合交互测试覆盖范围的可视化技术的探索性实证眼动仪研究
软件产品系列 (SPL) 通常会提供大量配置,以满足特定市场的各种需求。由于配置数量庞大,对所有配置进行单独测试是不可行的。相反,组合交互测试(Combinatorial Interaction Testing,CIT)可以根据配置中特征的交互标准计算出具有代表性的样本。我们利用眼动仪技术进行了一项实证研究,分析了两种基本可视化技术在传达十个不同复杂程度的案例研究的测试覆盖信息方面的有效性。我们的评估考虑了反应准确性、任务时间、元认知监控和视觉注意力。研究表明,在三个评估方面,一种可视化技术比另一种技术具有明显优势,而根据覆盖范围的强弱和视觉注意力的不同区域,效果则相反。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Systems and Software
Journal of Systems and Software 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
193
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Systems and Software publishes papers covering all aspects of software engineering and related hardware-software-systems issues. All articles should include a validation of the idea presented, e.g. through case studies, experiments, or systematic comparisons with other approaches already in practice. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: •Methods and tools for, and empirical studies on, software requirements, design, architecture, verification and validation, maintenance and evolution •Agile, model-driven, service-oriented, open source and global software development •Approaches for mobile, multiprocessing, real-time, distributed, cloud-based, dependable and virtualized systems •Human factors and management concerns of software development •Data management and big data issues of software systems •Metrics and evaluation, data mining of software development resources •Business and economic aspects of software development processes The journal welcomes state-of-the-art surveys and reports of practical experience for all of these topics.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Towards cost-efficient vulnerability detection with cross-modal adversarial reprogramming Predicting test failures induced by software defects: A lightweight alternative to software defect prediction and its industrial application An Attention-based Wide and Deep Neural Network for Reentrancy Vulnerability Detection in Smart Contracts The AmbiTRUS framework for identifying potential ambiguity in user stories
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1