Doxycycline as Post-Exposure Prophylaxis: Awareness, Beliefs, and Interest Among Patients with and at Risk for HIV.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AIDS and Behavior Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1007/s10461-024-04538-1
Joshua P Havens, Nathaniel Singh, Elizabeth Lyden, Sara H Bares
{"title":"Doxycycline as Post-Exposure Prophylaxis: Awareness, Beliefs, and Interest Among Patients with and at Risk for HIV.","authors":"Joshua P Havens, Nathaniel Singh, Elizabeth Lyden, Sara H Bares","doi":"10.1007/s10461-024-04538-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent studies have demonstrated the efficacy of doxycycline as post-exposure prophylaxis (doxy-PEP) for sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention, but little is known regarding patient beliefs and interest in doxy-PEP. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of adults (≥ 19 years) receiving care for HIV treatment (PWH) or prevention (pre-exposure prophylaxis, PrEP) between May-October 2023. The 32-question survey was organized into three parts: doxy-PEP awareness/beliefs/interest/concerns, sexual history, and demographics. Fishers Exact and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare responses between groups. Multivariate logistic regression identified predictive factors for doxy-PEP interest and concern(s). 166 participants completed the survey. Mean age was 43 years, 83% were male, 22% Black, and 13% Hispanic. Forty-one participants (25%) were on PrEP. Most respondents (75%) were unaware of doxy-PEP. Factors associated with doxy-PEP interest were respondents prescribed PrEP (aOR 2.67; 95% CI, 1.15-6.21) and belief of high risk for STI (aOR, 4.50; 95% CI, 2.24-9.07). Higher doxy-PEP concerns were associated with age ≤40 years (aOR, 3.10; 95% CI, 1.47-6.52), > high school education (aOR, 3.47; 95% CI, 1.64-7.33), and belief of high risk for STI (aOR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.21-5.50). In this single-site cohort survey study, most respondents were unaware of doxy-PEP but expressed interest and low levels of overall concern. Clinicians should offer doxy-PEP access to all patients at high risk for STIs or requesting the treatment after shared decision-making discussions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7543,"journal":{"name":"AIDS and Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-024-04538-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated the efficacy of doxycycline as post-exposure prophylaxis (doxy-PEP) for sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention, but little is known regarding patient beliefs and interest in doxy-PEP. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of adults (≥ 19 years) receiving care for HIV treatment (PWH) or prevention (pre-exposure prophylaxis, PrEP) between May-October 2023. The 32-question survey was organized into three parts: doxy-PEP awareness/beliefs/interest/concerns, sexual history, and demographics. Fishers Exact and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare responses between groups. Multivariate logistic regression identified predictive factors for doxy-PEP interest and concern(s). 166 participants completed the survey. Mean age was 43 years, 83% were male, 22% Black, and 13% Hispanic. Forty-one participants (25%) were on PrEP. Most respondents (75%) were unaware of doxy-PEP. Factors associated with doxy-PEP interest were respondents prescribed PrEP (aOR 2.67; 95% CI, 1.15-6.21) and belief of high risk for STI (aOR, 4.50; 95% CI, 2.24-9.07). Higher doxy-PEP concerns were associated with age ≤40 years (aOR, 3.10; 95% CI, 1.47-6.52), > high school education (aOR, 3.47; 95% CI, 1.64-7.33), and belief of high risk for STI (aOR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.21-5.50). In this single-site cohort survey study, most respondents were unaware of doxy-PEP but expressed interest and low levels of overall concern. Clinicians should offer doxy-PEP access to all patients at high risk for STIs or requesting the treatment after shared decision-making discussions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多西环素作为暴露后预防措施:艾滋病病毒感染者和高危人群对强力霉素的认识、信念和兴趣。
最近的研究表明,强力霉素作为暴露后预防疗法(doxy-PEP)具有预防性传播感染(STI)的疗效,但关于患者对强力霉素-PEP的看法和兴趣却知之甚少。我们在 2023 年 5 月至 10 月期间对接受艾滋病治疗(PWH)或预防(暴露前预防,PrEP)护理的成年人(≥ 19 岁)进行了横断面调查。这份包含 32 个问题的调查分为三个部分:对强力PEP的认识/信念/兴趣/顾虑、性史和人口统计学。采用 Fishers 精确检验和 Wilcoxon 秩和检验对各组之间的回答进行比较。多变量逻辑回归确定了Doxy-PEP兴趣和担忧的预测因素。166 名参与者完成了调查。平均年龄为 43 岁,83% 为男性,22% 为黑人,13% 为西班牙裔。41 名参与者(25%)正在接受 PrEP 治疗。大多数受访者(75%)不了解强效镇静剂。与对羟基-PEP 的兴趣相关的因素包括受访者处方了 PrEP(aOR 2.67;95% CI,1.15-6.21)以及认为性传播感染风险高(aOR,4.50;95% CI,2.24-9.07)。对强力杀虫剂-PEP 的更高关注度与年龄≤40 岁(aOR,3.10;95% CI,1.47-6.52)、高中以上教育程度(aOR,3.47;95% CI,1.64-7.33)和认为性传播感染风险高(aOR,2.58;95% CI,1.21-5.50)有关。在这项单点队列调查研究中,大多数受访者并不了解强力杀虫剂-PEP,但表示有兴趣且总体关注程度较低。临床医生应向所有性传播感染高风险患者或经共同决策讨论后要求治疗的患者提供 doxy-PEP 治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AIDS and Behavior
AIDS and Behavior Multiple-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
382
期刊介绍: AIDS and Behavior provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews. provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews.5 Year Impact Factor: 2.965 (2008) Section ''SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL'': Rank 5 of 29 Section ''PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH'': Rank 9 of 76
期刊最新文献
Family Social Support Mediates the Relationship Between the COVID-19 Pandemic and Psychosocial well-being in a Cohort of Young South Africans Newly Diagnosed with HIV. Equal Access, Equal Outcomes: Telehealth Utilization Around the COVID-19 Pandemic among People Living with HIV and Opioid Use Disorder in the Deep South. Health Care Service Utilization Among People with HIV, Chronic Pain, and Depression: Utilization and Cost Outcomes from the HIV-PASS Study. Life Course Stressors, Latent Coping Strategies, Alcohol Use, and Latent Coping Strategies Among People with HIV. Persistence With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Pre-exposure Prophylaxis in an Active-Duty Military Population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1