[Digital tools in primary total knee arthroplasty-Prevalence in the German-speaking region].

Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1007/s00132-024-04575-7
Florian Pohlig, Roland Becker, Max Ettinger, Tilman Calliess, Florian Hinterwimmer, Carsten O Tibesku, Christoph Schnurr, Heiko Graichen, Peter Savov, Stefano Pagano, Ralf Bieger, Hans Gollwitzer
{"title":"[Digital tools in primary total knee arthroplasty-Prevalence in the German-speaking region].","authors":"Florian Pohlig, Roland Becker, Max Ettinger, Tilman Calliess, Florian Hinterwimmer, Carsten O Tibesku, Christoph Schnurr, Heiko Graichen, Peter Savov, Stefano Pagano, Ralf Bieger, Hans Gollwitzer","doi":"10.1007/s00132-024-04575-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital tools are being increasingly used worldwide in primary knee arthroplasty. This study aimed to analyze the utilization density of digital tools, the preferred alignment strategies, and the obstacles and benefits of implementing these technologies in German-speaking countries.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An online survey with 57 questions about digital tools in primary knee arthroplasty and their usage was conducted among members of the Arthroplasty Working Group (AE). The survey included questions on navigation, robotics, patient-specific instruments, individualized implants, and augmented reality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey revealed that 18% of hospitals use navigation and 17% use robotic systems in primary total knee arthroplasty surgery. The main reasons for not implementing supportive technologies were high acquisition and ongoing costs, as well as longer surgical duration. Patient-specific instruments and individualized implants currently play a minor role. Patient-specific alignment strategies, such as kinematic (navigation: 35%; robotics: 44%) and functional alignment (navigation: 15%; robotics: 35%), are preferred in this context. With conventional instrumentation predominantly mechanical alignment was applied (79%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results indicate a relatively high utilization density of digital tools, which are mainly used to perform personalized alignment strategies in primary knee arthroplasty in German-speaking countries. This was particularly evident in high-volume hospitals. Economic aspects were the main reasons for not using these technologies. Future developments should aim to simplify the systems and thus achieve improved cost efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":74375,"journal":{"name":"Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"935-944"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-024-04575-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Digital tools are being increasingly used worldwide in primary knee arthroplasty. This study aimed to analyze the utilization density of digital tools, the preferred alignment strategies, and the obstacles and benefits of implementing these technologies in German-speaking countries.

Materials and methods: An online survey with 57 questions about digital tools in primary knee arthroplasty and their usage was conducted among members of the Arthroplasty Working Group (AE). The survey included questions on navigation, robotics, patient-specific instruments, individualized implants, and augmented reality.

Results: The survey revealed that 18% of hospitals use navigation and 17% use robotic systems in primary total knee arthroplasty surgery. The main reasons for not implementing supportive technologies were high acquisition and ongoing costs, as well as longer surgical duration. Patient-specific instruments and individualized implants currently play a minor role. Patient-specific alignment strategies, such as kinematic (navigation: 35%; robotics: 44%) and functional alignment (navigation: 15%; robotics: 35%), are preferred in this context. With conventional instrumentation predominantly mechanical alignment was applied (79%).

Discussion: The results indicate a relatively high utilization density of digital tools, which are mainly used to perform personalized alignment strategies in primary knee arthroplasty in German-speaking countries. This was particularly evident in high-volume hospitals. Economic aspects were the main reasons for not using these technologies. Future developments should aim to simplify the systems and thus achieve improved cost efficiency.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[数字化工具在初级全膝关节置换术中的应用--德语区的普及率]。
背景:在世界范围内,数字化工具正越来越多地应用于初级膝关节置换术中。本研究旨在分析数字工具的使用密度、首选的对位策略以及在德语国家实施这些技术的障碍和益处:在关节成形术工作小组(AE)成员中开展了一项在线调查,就初级膝关节成形术中的数字化工具及其使用情况提出了 57 个问题。调查内容包括导航、机器人、患者专用器械、个性化植入物和增强现实等问题:调查显示,18% 的医院在初级全膝关节置换手术中使用导航技术,17% 的医院使用机器人系统。未采用辅助技术的主要原因是购置和持续成本较高,以及手术时间较长。目前,患者专用器械和个性化植入物的作用不大。针对患者的对位策略,如运动学对位(导航:35%;机器人:44%)和功能性对位(导航:15%;机器人:35%),在这种情况下更受青睐。传统器械主要采用机械对位(79%):讨论:研究结果表明,在德语国家,数字化工具的使用密度相对较高,主要用于在初级膝关节置换术中执行个性化的对位策略。这一点在工作量大的医院尤为明显。经济因素是不使用这些技术的主要原因。未来的发展应致力于简化系统,从而提高成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Endoprosthetic treatment of femoral neck fractures in Germany : Cumulative analysis of EPRD registry data from 2013 to 2020]. [Risk factors and prevention strategies for periprosthetic femoral fractures in hip arthroplasty]. The effects of balance training in patients with total hip arthroplasty : A randomized controlled pilot study. [Digital tools in primary total knee arthroplasty-Prevalence in the German-speaking region]. [Biomechanics of the intervertebral disc : Consequences of degenerative changes].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1