Learning curve of multiple surgeons for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the cumulative sum method: a retrospective single-institution study.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of Robotic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1007/s11701-024-02122-2
Takashi Nagai, Toshiki Etani, Nobuhiko Shimizu, Masakazu Gonda, Maria Aoki, Toshiharu Morikawa, Shoichiro Iwatsuki, Kazumi Taguchi, Taku Naiki, Kentaro Mizuno, Ryosuke Ando, Atsushi Okada, Noriyasu Kawai, Keiichi Tozawa, Takahiro Yasui
{"title":"Learning curve of multiple surgeons for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the cumulative sum method: a retrospective single-institution study.","authors":"Takashi Nagai, Toshiki Etani, Nobuhiko Shimizu, Masakazu Gonda, Maria Aoki, Toshiharu Morikawa, Shoichiro Iwatsuki, Kazumi Taguchi, Taku Naiki, Kentaro Mizuno, Ryosuke Ando, Atsushi Okada, Noriyasu Kawai, Keiichi Tozawa, Takahiro Yasui","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02122-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prostate cancer (PC) is common among men and has become a significant societal issue. Localized PC has a good prognosis with appropriate treatment. Prostatectomy, particularly robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), has become a common treatment since the da Vinci prostatectomy was approved by the FDA in 2001. The current study aimed to assess the learning curve for RARP, focusing on anastomosis time, using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method. Data were collected from Nagoya City University Hospital between May 2011 and December 2018 and included 469 surgeries performed by experienced surgeons. Our findings indicated that, on average, 11 patients were required to complete the initial phase and 24 patients were required to complete the consolidation phase of anastomosis. Additionally, for complete resection of pT2c cases, 16 cases were required for the initial phase and 27 cases were required for the consolidation phase. The CUSUM method proved useful for visualizing trends in surgical proficiency, although the study noted potential confounding biases and limitations in evaluating surgical proficiency based solely on surgical time or positive surgical margins.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"389"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02122-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PC) is common among men and has become a significant societal issue. Localized PC has a good prognosis with appropriate treatment. Prostatectomy, particularly robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), has become a common treatment since the da Vinci prostatectomy was approved by the FDA in 2001. The current study aimed to assess the learning curve for RARP, focusing on anastomosis time, using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method. Data were collected from Nagoya City University Hospital between May 2011 and December 2018 and included 469 surgeries performed by experienced surgeons. Our findings indicated that, on average, 11 patients were required to complete the initial phase and 24 patients were required to complete the consolidation phase of anastomosis. Additionally, for complete resection of pT2c cases, 16 cases were required for the initial phase and 27 cases were required for the consolidation phase. The CUSUM method proved useful for visualizing trends in surgical proficiency, although the study noted potential confounding biases and limitations in evaluating surgical proficiency based solely on surgical time or positive surgical margins.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用累积总和法进行机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的多名外科医生的学习曲线:一项单一机构的回顾性研究。
前列腺癌(PC)在男性中很常见,已成为一个重要的社会问题。如果治疗得当,局部 PC 的预后良好。自2001年达芬奇前列腺切除术获得FDA批准以来,前列腺切除术,尤其是机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术(RARP)已成为一种常见的治疗方法。本研究旨在使用累积总和(CUSUM)法评估 RARP 的学习曲线,重点是吻合时间。数据收集自名古屋市立大学医院,时间跨度为 2011 年 5 月至 2018 年 12 月,包括由经验丰富的外科医生实施的 469 例手术。我们的研究结果表明,平均 11 名患者需要完成吻合术的初始阶段,24 名患者需要完成吻合术的巩固阶段。此外,要完全切除 pT2c 病例,初始阶段需要 16 例,巩固阶段需要 27 例。尽管该研究指出,仅根据手术时间或手术切缘阳性来评估手术熟练程度可能存在混杂偏差和局限性,但事实证明 CUSUM 方法有助于直观了解手术熟练程度的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Body mass index influence on short-term perioperative results in robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. KangDuo surgical robot versus da Vinci robotic system in urologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Risk factors for urinary retention after robot-assisted radical cystectomy with orthotopic neobladder diversion: a multicenter study. Single-port robotic versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The crucial role of 5G, 6G, and fiber in robotic telesurgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1