Retrospective Evaluation of Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Level of Reduced Diameter Implants by Mixed Model Analysis.

Paul Henn, Peter Gehrke, Arndt Happe, Jörg Neugebauer
{"title":"Retrospective Evaluation of Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Level of Reduced Diameter Implants by Mixed Model Analysis.","authors":"Paul Henn, Peter Gehrke, Arndt Happe, Jörg Neugebauer","doi":"10.11607/jomi.10574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The goal of successful implant placement is to maintain a long-term stable marginal peri-implant bone level (MBL). This retrospective study investigated the MBL of reduceddiameter implants (RDI). The implants were analyzed in different indication in the context of various surgical and prosthetic treatment strategies using heterogeneous data from a private practice. Mixed model analysis was used to process the heterogeneous data structure. This method has not been a standard method of data analysis in implantology, and it shows considerable advantages over conventional variance analyses regarding data integration from outpatient practices.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>123 patients were treated with 326 implants. 247 implants were diameter-reduced, the remaining 79 implants were standard implants (SDI) as patient related controls. The mean observation time was 24.4 months, and the maximum observation time 76.0 months. The peri-implant bone level of the implants was evaluated, while considering the diameter, as well as the time of implant placement, time of loading, extent of augmentation and localization of the implants. The data were evaluated after restructuring using mixed model analysis.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>No significant difference was found between the use of RDI or SDI in the analyzed indication. Furthermore, no significant difference was found for the implant placement time, loading time, and the use of two-stage augmentations regarding the stability of the peri-implant bone level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Narrow-diameter implants are a sufficient treatment option in horizontally deficient bone conditions. The use of diameterreduced implants in the posterior region shows promising results; 3.5mm diameter implants may be indicated considering the individual patient situation. The use of mixed model analysis for the evaluation of heterogeneous practice data can lead to a significant increase in the number of retrospective studies and data integration from practices, forming a sound basis for evidence-based dentistry.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.10574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The goal of successful implant placement is to maintain a long-term stable marginal peri-implant bone level (MBL). This retrospective study investigated the MBL of reduceddiameter implants (RDI). The implants were analyzed in different indication in the context of various surgical and prosthetic treatment strategies using heterogeneous data from a private practice. Mixed model analysis was used to process the heterogeneous data structure. This method has not been a standard method of data analysis in implantology, and it shows considerable advantages over conventional variance analyses regarding data integration from outpatient practices.

Method: 123 patients were treated with 326 implants. 247 implants were diameter-reduced, the remaining 79 implants were standard implants (SDI) as patient related controls. The mean observation time was 24.4 months, and the maximum observation time 76.0 months. The peri-implant bone level of the implants was evaluated, while considering the diameter, as well as the time of implant placement, time of loading, extent of augmentation and localization of the implants. The data were evaluated after restructuring using mixed model analysis.

Result: No significant difference was found between the use of RDI or SDI in the analyzed indication. Furthermore, no significant difference was found for the implant placement time, loading time, and the use of two-stage augmentations regarding the stability of the peri-implant bone level.

Conclusion: Narrow-diameter implants are a sufficient treatment option in horizontally deficient bone conditions. The use of diameterreduced implants in the posterior region shows promising results; 3.5mm diameter implants may be indicated considering the individual patient situation. The use of mixed model analysis for the evaluation of heterogeneous practice data can lead to a significant increase in the number of retrospective studies and data integration from practices, forming a sound basis for evidence-based dentistry.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过混合模型分析法回顾性评估小直径种植体的种植体周围边缘骨水平。
目的:成功植入种植体的目标是保持长期稳定的边缘种植体周围骨水平(MBL)。这项回顾性研究调查了小直径种植体(RDI)的骨水平。使用来自一家私人诊所的异质性数据,分析了不同适应症的种植体在不同手术和修复治疗策略下的情况。混合模型分析用于处理异构数据结构。这种方法还不是种植学数据分析的标准方法,与传统的方差分析相比,它在门诊数据整合方面具有相当大的优势:方法:123 名患者接受了 326 个种植体的治疗。方法:123 名患者接受了 326 个种植体的治疗,其中 247 个种植体直径缩小,其余 79 个种植体为标准种植体(SDI),作为与患者相关的对照。平均观察时间为 24.4 个月,最长观察时间为 76.0 个月。在考虑直径、植入时间、加载时间、增量程度和植入位置的同时,还对植入体周围的骨水平进行了评估。使用混合模型分析法对重组后的数据进行评估:结果:在分析的适应症中,使用 RDI 或 SDI 没有发现明显差异。此外,在种植体植入时间、加载时间和使用两阶段增量法方面,种植体周围骨水平的稳定性也没有发现明显差异:结论:窄直径种植体足以满足水平骨缺损的治疗需求。在后部区域使用直径较小的种植体显示出良好的效果;考虑到患者的个体情况,直径为 3.5 毫米的种植体可能适用。使用混合模型分析评估不同的实践数据,可以显著增加回顾性研究和实践数据整合的数量,为循证牙科治疗奠定坚实的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Horizontal Guided Bone Regeneration: L-PRF Bone-Block Vs A Mixture of Autogenous Bone with Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral. A Split-Mouth RCT Study with 25 Months Follow-Up. Influence of Dental Implant Diameters on Prosthesis Complications: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Qualitative Analysis of Implant-Bone Interface After Implant Placement Implementing Condensation Technique In Vitro. Thermal Changes During Digital Guided Implant Surgery Using the Conventional and Single Drill Protocols. Effect of Primary Stability on Short vs. Conventional -Implants with Reverse Concave Neck.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1