Additively Manufactured Definitive Crown Resins on Premolar and Molar Teeth: 2-Year Results of a Prospective Clinical Study.

Ezgi Sonkaya, Gonca Zeliha Bek Kürklü
{"title":"Additively Manufactured Definitive Crown Resins on Premolar and Molar Teeth: 2-Year Results of a Prospective Clinical Study.","authors":"Ezgi Sonkaya, Gonca Zeliha Bek Kürklü","doi":"10.11607/ijp.9200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the 12- and 24-month clinical results of overlay and one-piece endodontic crown restorations applied with additively manufactured, 3D-printed, permanent ceramic-filled resin (PCR) according to the modified US Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 33 indirect restorations (16 overlay, 17 endocrown; 4 premolar, 29 molar) produced using PCR (Formlabs) were applied in 30 patients by a single dentist. The restorations were evaluated according to the modified USPHS criteria at baseline (1 week), 12 months, and 24 months by two independent evaluators. For comparisons of the dependent criteria scores, related samples Cochran Q test was used, and in post-hoc paired comparisons, Bonferroni test was used. Fisher-Freeman-Halton test was applied in the comparisons of categoric variables according to the restoration type groups (α = .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant difference was determined between the evaluation criteria scores at baseline, 12 months, and 24 months for marginal adaptation (P = .05), retention (P = 1), interproximal contact (P = .368), color match (P = 1), surface texture (P = 1), and patient satisfaction (P = 1). The only score criterion that showed a statistically significant difference between baseline and 24 months (P = .001) was marginal discoloration. This criterion's score change was from 100% A score to 69.7% A score.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the 2-year follow-up of indirect single-tooth restorations produced with 3D-printed PCR, all restorations showed acceptable clinical performance (≥ 99.5% A + B score at 2 years).</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"279-289"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the 12- and 24-month clinical results of overlay and one-piece endodontic crown restorations applied with additively manufactured, 3D-printed, permanent ceramic-filled resin (PCR) according to the modified US Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria.

Materials and methods: A total of 33 indirect restorations (16 overlay, 17 endocrown; 4 premolar, 29 molar) produced using PCR (Formlabs) were applied in 30 patients by a single dentist. The restorations were evaluated according to the modified USPHS criteria at baseline (1 week), 12 months, and 24 months by two independent evaluators. For comparisons of the dependent criteria scores, related samples Cochran Q test was used, and in post-hoc paired comparisons, Bonferroni test was used. Fisher-Freeman-Halton test was applied in the comparisons of categoric variables according to the restoration type groups (α = .05).

Results: No statistically significant difference was determined between the evaluation criteria scores at baseline, 12 months, and 24 months for marginal adaptation (P = .05), retention (P = 1), interproximal contact (P = .368), color match (P = 1), surface texture (P = 1), and patient satisfaction (P = 1). The only score criterion that showed a statistically significant difference between baseline and 24 months (P = .001) was marginal discoloration. This criterion's score change was from 100% A score to 69.7% A score.

Conclusions: In the 2-year follow-up of indirect single-tooth restorations produced with 3D-printed PCR, all restorations showed acceptable clinical performance (≥ 99.5% A + B score at 2 years).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前臼齿和臼齿的三维打印永久树脂牙冠;一项前瞻性临床研究的两年结果。
目的:这项前瞻性临床研究的目的是根据美国公共卫生署(USPHS)的修订标准,评估使用添加剂制造的 3D 打印永久性陶瓷填充树脂(PCR)进行覆盖和一片式牙髓冠修复的 12 个月和 24 个月临床效果:由一名牙医为 30 名患者使用 PCR(Formlabs)制作了 33 个间接修复体(16 个覆盖体,17 个冠内修复体)(4 个前磨牙,29 个臼齿)。修复体在基线(7 天)、12 个月和 24 个月时由两名独立评估员根据修改后的 USPHS 标准进行评估。研究注册号为 NCT05168852。在因果关系标准分数的比较中,使用了相关样本 Cochran Q 检验,在事后配对比较中,使用了 Bonferroni 检验。在根据修复类型分组进行的分类变量比较中,采用了 Fisher-Freeman-Halton 检验(α = 0.05):基线、12 个月和 24 个月时,边缘适应性(P=0.05)、固位(P=1)、近侧接触(P=0.368)、颜色匹配(P=1)、表面质地(P=1)和患者满意度(P=1)的评价标准得分之间没有统计学意义上的差异。在所有其他标准中,唯一在基线和 24 个月之间有显著统计学差异(P=0.001)的评分标准是边缘变色。该标准的得分从 100% A 分变为 69.7% A 分:结论:在对使用 3D 打印 PCR 制作的间接单牙修复体进行 2 年随访时,所有修复体的临床表现均可接受。(结论:在使用三维打印 PCR 制作的间接单牙修复体的 2 年随访中,所有修复体的临床表现均可接受(2 年时 A+B 评分≥99.5%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Functional Improvement of Occlusion for a Patient with Acquired Open Bite Using a Fully Digital Workflow of Computer-Guided Occlusal Adjustment. Monolithic Zirconia Full-Arch Rehabilitation Using a Motion- Integrated Digital Workflow Combining M-4 and All-On-4 Protocols: A Clinical Report. Evaluating the Passivity of Implant-Supported Monolithic Zirconia Three-Unit Fixed Partial Denture Screwed to Multi-Unit Abutments with and without a Titanium-Base. Unraveling Psychological Distress in Temporomandibular Disorders: The Interplay of Somatization, Oral Behaviors, and Personality Traits. Restoration of Trumpet-Playing Ability using a Maxillofacial Prosthesis and External Pressure Support in a Patient with a Maxillary Defect: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1